Hello.
Just for my couriosity: I'm missing llvm-as, llvm-ld and other binutils
from LLVM and was wondering why they are contained in the port's llvm
collection but not in FreeBSD's source contribution.
I build FreeBSD 9 with CLANG. But as a missing llvm-as and llvm-ld (or
llvm-ar) would imply
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> Hello.
> Just for my couriosity: I'm missing llvm-as, llvm-ld and other binutils
> from LLVM and was wondering why they are contained in the port's llvm
> collection but not in FreeBSD's source contribution.
There's no use for thes
On Fri Jun 17 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Jun 16 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> > hi there,
>
> i reverted my kernel back to r222890. everything works fine now and both
> issues
> i mentioned below dissapeared.
the previous issues (xpt_action_default and DIOCSKERNELDUMP) have been fixed.
how
On 6/25/11 12:39 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:09:08PM -0400, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
>> No problem. I just set kern.geom.debugflags=4 in loader.conf and here is
>> new photo (with recent kernel, no patches):
>> http://img803.imageshack.us/img803/4679/25062011006.jpg
>> I s
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 07:27:20AM -0400, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> > I use splitting by half method to find exact date which boots, then see
> > the next commit above that date. Pre-commit kernel goes to multiuser and
> > network is alive. I don't test CDs are working, I'll do that later and
> >
Hi Folks,
you may know that in the Summer of Code programme I'm working on
replacing the old regex code with TRE, which is a BSD-licensed
implementation. It supports wide characters, is POSIX-compliant and has
a good performance compared to most of the open source implementations.
Actually, I
I would like to ask for testing of the following patch.
Since the patch affects panic(9) context, then obviously its testing requires
getting some sort of panic, and preferably some sort of "post-panic" activity
too:
doing something in kdb, dumping a core (via debugger command or in unattended
mo
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim
> wrote:
>> >> Any ideas regarding the virtualbox itself ?
>> >
>> > I am rebuilding world/kernel now. �After that, I'll rebuild
>> >
Does anybody actually use kern.sync_on_panic tunable/sysctl?
If yes, then in what circumstances do you need it?
That is, why any other alternative doesn't work for you?
Like:
1. remounting filesystems R/O before panic if you knowingly provoke it for
testing
2. using netboot for your test system
3
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>
> I would also like to get your input on my two other patches - randomization
> of the synchronization pattern and ad-hoc asynchronous more. Hastd appears
> extremely useful to synchronize large virtual disks over slow links without
> taking
On Saturday 25 June 2011 01:05:26 Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> Jeremy Messenger
Done.
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/223536
--HPS
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe,
On 06/25/11 10:10, Roman Divacky wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Hello.
Just for my couriosity: I'm missing llvm-as, llvm-ld and other binutils
from LLVM and was wondering why they are contained in the port's llvm
collection but not in FreeBSD's source contri
On 25 Jun 2011 15:08, "Gabor Kovesdan" wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> you may know that in the Summer of Code programme I'm working on replacing
the old regex code with TRE, which is a BSD-licensed implementation. It
supports wide characters, is POSIX-compliant and has a good performance
compared to mos
On Jun 24, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> On Saturday 25 June 2011 00:15:17 Warner Losh wrote:
>>> Hey Hans,
>>>
>>> Given that all this stuff is really new and shiny, and we're really close
>>> to the feature freeze,
On Jun 25, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Saturday 25 June 2011 01:05:26 Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> Jeremy Messenger
>
> Done.
>
> http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/223536
Please move it back. It doesn't belong in /etc/defaults. It belongs in
/etc/devd if we're going
On Saturday 25 June 2011 18:45:14 Warner Losh wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > On Saturday 25 June 2011 01:05:26 Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> >> Jeremy Messenger
> >
> > Done.
> >
> > http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/223536
>
> Please move it back. It doesn
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:57:16PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 06:20:03PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote:
> > Got a "panic: Not a vnode object" quite fast:
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/kostik441.txt
>
> Ah, yes, this is an assertion that was added in the
Forgive me if I'm patronizing, but is there any surprise that a POSIX
NFA implementation is slower than grep's DFA?
Oh, of course an NFA implementation will always be slightly slower but
the memory footprint will also be smaller, which is a big advantage for
embedded systems. But in this case,
On Saturday 25 June 2011 20:53:53 Greg Rivers wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > It appears there are some bugs in the USB2 HAL implementation. For
> > example the parent USB device is not always correctly set and there are
> > problems with dynamic attach/detach of USB de
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
It appears there are some bugs in the USB2 HAL implementation. For
example the parent USB device is not always correctly set and there are
problems with dynamic attach/detach of USB devices in hald.
For users of 9-current and 8-stable:
Copy the
on 25/06/2011 21:53 Greg Rivers said the following:
> Jun 25 13:15:45 blue kernel: ugen4.3: at usbus4
> Jun 25 13:15:45 blue kernel: umass0: Device,
> class 0/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 3> on usbus4
> Jun 25 13:15:45 blue kernel: umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x
> Jun 25 13:15:47 blue ke
The GHC (Glasgow Haskell Compiler) was marked broken by pointyhat
sometime back in May, following its update to GHC 7.0.3_1. I'm not sure
if anyone has looked at this, but it doesn't appear anyone has. Sorry
if any of this is repeated.
I tried building the port yesterday, with both GCC and C
Hi Eric,
On 06/26/11 02:13, Eric McCorkle wrote:
> The GHC (Glasgow Haskell Compiler) was marked broken by pointyhat
> sometime back in May, following its update to GHC 7.0.3_1. I'm not
> sure if anyone has looked at this, but it doesn't appear anyone has.
Yes, you are right, sorry, I have not
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Hm, I have to ask, have you tried this without sg driver?
Thanks for the suggestion. Hans Petter suggested the same thing in IRC
earlier today. We're trying that and a few other things.
--
Greg Rivers
__
On Saturday 25 June 2011 19:07:01 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Saturday 25 June 2011 18:45:14 Warner Losh wrote:
> > On Jun 25, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > On Saturday 25 June 2011 01:05:26 Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> > >> Jeremy Messenger
> > >
> > > Done.
> > >
> > > htt
On Jun 25, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Does anybody actually use kern.sync_on_panic tunable/sysctl?
> If yes, then in what circumstances do you need it?
> That is, why any other alternative doesn't work for you?
> Like:
> 1. remounting filesystems R/O before panic if you knowingly prov
On Jun 25, 2011, at 11:38 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Saturday 25 June 2011 19:07:01 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> On Saturday 25 June 2011 18:45:14 Warner Losh wrote:
>>> On Jun 25, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Saturday 25 June 2011 01:05:26 Jeremy Messenger wrote
27 matches
Mail list logo
