On 9 June 2011 10:45, Eir Nym wrote:
> On 8 June 2011 23:12, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote:
>> 08.06.2011 17:54, Eir Nym wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8 June 2011 16:10, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote:
08.06.2011 11:10, Eir Nym wrote:
>
> gpart show is work now, but not when I load zfs into memory
On 09.06.2011 11:31, Eir Nym wrote:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=157723
Can't reproduce.
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=157724
First of read this tread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-May/062744.html
>>> and after reboot try:
>>> zpool creat
2011/6/9 Andrey V. Elsukov :
> On 09.06.2011 11:31, Eir Nym wrote:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=157723
>
> Can't reproduce.
Which revision do you use?
Following link for mail is about this.
>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=157724
>
> First of read this tread:
> htt
On 09.06.2011 13:32, Eir Nym wrote:
> Which revision do you use?
>
> Following link for mail is about this.
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=157724
>>
>> First of read this tread:
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-May/062744.html
I mean that BSD scheme create
2011/6/9 Andrey V. Elsukov :
> On 09.06.2011 13:32, Eir Nym wrote:
>> Which revision do you use?
>>
>> Following link for mail is about this.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=157724
>>>
>>> First of read this tread:
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-May/06274
Hi, yesterday I tried switch event timer on i8254 - it do nothing.
I disabled hyperthreading - now eat from 50% to 100%
All dmesg is lines:
(noperiph:ata3:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued
(noperiph:ata3:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued
(noperiph:ata2:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued
(noperiph:ata3:0
On Thursday, June 09, 2011 2:11:16 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 09/06/2011 01:30 John said the following:
> > Sorry John, here's the verbose dmesg output with your patch applied.
> >
> > This is at the tail of the console:
> >
> > pcib1: allocated memory range (0xf600-0xf6ff) for rid 10 of
On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 11:59:52 pm Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> hi,
> during my tests with netmap with 10Gbit cards (82599, dual port),
> i notice that a motherboard with an AMD 880G chipset
> is performing significantly worse than an intel based one.
> In both cases the NIC is mounted on a 16x PCIe s
On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 4:20:00 pm deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:56 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 11:20:17 am deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:35 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> found-> vendor=0x1002, dev=0x4170, r
Andrey Smagin wrote:
> Hi, yesterday I tried switch event timer on i8254 - it do nothing.
> I disabled hyperthreading - now eat from 50% to 100%
> All dmesg is lines:
> (noperiph:ata3:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued
> (noperiph:ata3:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued
> (noperiph:ata2:0:-1:-1): rescan
Since the notice mentioned in /usr/src/UPDATE (20110608) both gcc-4.5
and 4.6 seems to need to be recompiled. I tried some ports with
"USE_FORTRAN= yes" setand they failed as with gcc-4.6. There was always
an error reporting: undefined reference to __cpumask_t or similar.
Oliver
__
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:22 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> Hmm, I would say 'progress' actually as it's getting better:
>
>
>> map[10]: type Prefetchable Memory, range 32, base 0xe000, size 28,
>> enabled
>> pcib1: attempting to grow prefetch window for
>> (0xe000-0xefff,0x1000)
2011/6/9 Hartmann, O. :
> Since the notice mentioned in /usr/src/UPDATE (20110608) both gcc-4.5 and
> 4.6 seems to need to be recompiled. I tried some ports with "USE_FORTRAN=
> yes" setand they failed as with gcc-4.6. There was always an error
> reporting: undefined reference to __cpumask_t or sim
On Thursday, June 09, 2011 2:07:31 pm deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
> pcib1: attempting to grow prefetch window for
> (0xe000-0xefff,0x1000)
> back candidate range: 0xe000-0xefff
> pcib1: failed to grow prefetch window to 0xd000-0xefff: 6
Hmm, ENXIO is an odd error
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:07:15PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> Since the notice mentioned in /usr/src/UPDATE (20110608) both gcc-4.5
> and 4.6 seems to need to be recompiled. I tried some ports with
> "USE_FORTRAN= yes" setand they failed as with gcc-4.6. There was always
> an error reporting:
On Jun 9, 2011, at 11:07 AM, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ... ]
> PS: u should learn to properly use backward references ("it") in ur sentences.
Hmm.
Let's just say that there are more effective ways to persuade someone like John
who is volunteering their time writing patches to continue to tr
On 06/09/11 14:12, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/6/9 Hartmann, O. :
>> Since the notice mentioned in /usr/src/UPDATE (20110608) both gcc-4.5 and
>> 4.6 seems to need to be recompiled. I tried some ports with "USE_FORTRAN=
>> yes" setand they failed as with gcc-4.6. There was always an error
>> reportin
Hi Community,
First I introduce myself, Mohammed Farrag, ArabBSD Project Manager and
FreeBSD Contributor. We have a project to extend FreeBSD in Arab world. We
aim to work in two direction. First, we will translate FreeBSD
Documentation and learning tutorials to Arabic. Second, we will have s
2011/6/9 Michael Butler :
> On 06/09/11 14:12, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/6/9 Hartmann, O. :
>>> Since the notice mentioned in /usr/src/UPDATE (20110608) both gcc-4.5 and
>>> 4.6 seems to need to be recompiled. I tried some ports with "USE_FORTRAN=
>>> yes" setand they failed as with gcc-4.6. There
Things that change the way the base system behaves w/rt ports need
version bumps.
mcl
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@fre
2011/6/9 Mark Linimon :
> Things that change the way the base system behaves w/rt ports need
> version bumps.
BTW, could someone provide an actual error message?
I assume these errors are caused by cpumask_t going away.
Attilio
--
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
On 9 June 2011 22:15, Mohammed Farrag wrote:
[snip: ArabBSD website]
Nice initiative! Best to get the website in Arabic; IMHO works best to
get members for the local community. Secondly you might want to start
a mailinglist and/or forjum, as I could not find any means of
communications apart fro
On 06/09/11 17:18, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/6/9 Mark Linimon :
>> Things that change the way the base system behaves w/rt ports need
>> version bumps.
>
> BTW, could someone provide an actual error message?
>
> I assume these errors are caused by cpumask_t going away.
For emulators/virtualbox-o
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:56 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, June 09, 2011 2:07:31 pm deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
>> pcib1: attempting to grow prefetch window for
>> (0xe000-0xefff,0x1000)
>> back candidate range: 0xe000-0xefff
>> pcib1: failed to grow prefetch win
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Michael Butler
wrote:
> On 06/09/11 17:18, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/6/9 Mark Linimon :
>>> Things that change the way the base system behaves w/rt ports need
>>> version bumps.
>>
>> BTW, could someone provide an actual error message?
>>
>> I assume these err
Hello,
Thanks for your reply. I will translate the website soon. We have already
our mailing list but it's not active yet. We will activate it during the
summer courses.
Regards,
Mohammed
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Rick van der Zwet
wrote:
> On 9 June 2011 22:15, Mohammed Farrag wrote
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Philip Paeps wrote:
> On 9 Jun 2011, at 22:15, Mohammed Farrag wrote:
> > First I introduce myself, Mohammed Farrag, ArabBSD Project Manager and
> > FreeBSD Contributor. We have a project to extend FreeBSD in Arab world.
>
> Nice
2011/6/9 Michael Butler :
> On 06/09/11 17:18, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/6/9 Mark Linimon :
>>> Things that change the way the base system behaves w/rt ports need
>>> version bumps.
>>
>> BTW, could someone provide an actual error message?
>>
>> I assume these errors are caused by cpumask_t going
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 06:01:04PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> On 06/09/11 17:18, Attilio Rao wrote:
> > 2011/6/9 Mark Linimon :
> >> Things that change the way the base system behaves w/rt ports need
> >> version bumps.
> >
> > BTW, could someone provide an actual error message?
> >
> > I ass
> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:26:56 -0400
> From: Attilio Rao
> Sender: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
>
> 2011/6/9 Michael Butler :
> > On 06/09/11 17:18, Attilio Rao wrote:
> >> 2011/6/9 Mark Linimon :
> >>> Things that change the way the base system behaves w/rt ports need
> >>> version bumps.
"Hartmann, O." writes:
> Since the notice mentioned in /usr/src/UPDATE (20110608) both gcc-4.5
> and 4.6 seems to need to be recompiled. I tried some ports with
> "USE_FORTRAN= yes" setand they failed as with gcc-4.6. There was
> always an error reporting: undefined reference to __cpumask_t or
>
On 09.06.2011 14:22, Eir Nym wrote:
> GEOM will say it only after reboot.
> part of dmesg log:
>
> GEOM_LABEL[1]: MSDOSFS: gzero: no FAT signature found.
> ugen0.1: at usbus0
> uhub0: on usbus0
> ugen1.1: at usbus1
> uhub1: on usbus1
> ugen2.1: at usbus2
> uhub2: on usbus2
> ugen3.1: at usb
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Mohammed Farrag wrote:
> Hi Community,
>
> First I introduce myself, Mohammed Farrag, ArabBSD Project Manager and
> FreeBSD Contributor. We have a project to extend FreeBSD in Arab world. We
> aim to work in two direction. First, we will translate FreeBSD
> Docu
Great thanx ! It working ! :)
Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:40:18 +0300 письмо от Alexander Motin :
> Andrey Smagin wrote:
> > Hi, yesterday I tried switch event timer on i8254 - it do nothing.
> > I disabled hyperthreading - now eat from 50% to 100%
> > All dmesg is lines:
> > (noperiph:ata3:0:-1:-1):
34 matches
Mail list logo
