Quoting David Demelier (from Mon, 21 Mar
2011 07:04:18 +0100):
On 20/03/2011 17:31, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:34:51 +0100 David Demelier
wrote:
Hello,
I was surprised to see there is no ${MK_JAIL} conditional to remove
old files on 8.2-RELEASE so I started to w
Hi Folks,
Just a notice that the 1.5.3 OFED Infiniband stack will be committed as
soon as a fresh buildworld/installworld completes on my test machine.
This brings in new drivers and user code and a very small number of
changes to system sources. OFED will not be built by default and
WITH_OF
Hi,
yesterday I tested the images listed in the subject and have the following
remarks:
- At least the memstick image contains an empty fstab
- Does the usage of a "dangerously dedikated disklabel" give any advantage?
- The usage of an UFS-Label for root mounting should be more flexible
- The f
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 07:04:22 +0100
Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> On Monday 21 March 2011 00:16:01 Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
>> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 05:59:45 +0800
>> > Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 21 March 2011 04:28, Sergey V. Dyatko
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > Last patch f
On Monday, March 21, 2011 10:29:11 Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 07:04:22 +0100
> Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>
> >> On Monday 21 March 2011 00:16:01 Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 05:59:45 +0800
> >> > Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On 21 March 2
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Lars Engels wrote:
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:04:28 +0100
From: Lars Engels
To: Michael Reifenberger
Cc: Nathan Whitehorn ,
FreeBSD-Current
Subject: Re: bsdinstall-amd64-20110313 remarks
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:25:36AM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
Hi,
yester
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:25:36AM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> Hi,
> yesterday I tested the images listed in the subject and have the following
> remarks:
>
> - At least the memstick image contains an empty fstab
> - Does the usage of a "dangerously dedikated disklabel" give any advantag
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:00:49 +0100
Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> On Monday, March 21, 2011 10:29:11 Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 07:04:22 +0100
>> > Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> >
>> > >> On Monday 21 March 2011 00:16:01 Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
>> > >> > On Mon,
TB --- 2011-03-21 09:46:05 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 09:46:05 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-03-21 09:46:05 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 09:46:16 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 09:46:16 - /usr/bin/c
> So can You (or someone else) hint me, how to done this?
>
> switch (what to do) {
> case 'Remake run to support PCI and SoC interface':
> Much work to make driver bus independent;
> case 'Port OpenBSD one':
> driver do not support SoC (SoC device don't have MCU);
> break;
> cas
TB --- 2011-03-21 10:53:22 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 10:53:22 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2011-03-21 10:53:22 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 10:53:32 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 10:53:32 - /usr/bin/c
On 21/03/11 08:12 AM, owner-freebsd-secur...@freebsd.org wrote:
> Your request to the freebsd-security mailing list
>
> Posting of your message titled "[CFR] Multiple remote and local
> vulnerabilities of high-speed USB WLAN
> ethernet devices using high-speed OFDM modulation schemes."
>
> has
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:43:33 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:43:33 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:43:33 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:43:50 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:43:50 - /u
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:50:45 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:50:45 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:50:45 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:50:57 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:50:57 - /usr
on 21/03/2011 13:04 Etienne Robillard said the following:
>
>> So can You (or someone else) hint me, how to done this?
>>
>> switch (what to do) {
>> case 'Remake run to support PCI and SoC interface':
>> Much work to make driver bus independent;
>> case 'Port OpenBSD one':
>> driver do
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:22:09 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:22:09 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:22:09 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:22:23 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 11:22:23 - /usr
Sources actually updated to r219820; change from r219821 was
hand-applied. That got me through the buildworld. :-}
Building kernel modules fails, though:
>>> stage 3.1: making dependencies
...
>>> stage 3.2: building everything
...
===> mlx (all)
...
===> mlx4 (all)
cc -O2 -pipe -DINET6 -fno-st
TB --- 2011-03-21 12:04:28 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 12:04:28 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v
TB --- 2011-03-21 12:04:28 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 12:04:38 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 12:04:38 - /usr/b
On 03/21/11 03:25, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I tested the images listed in the subject and have the
following remarks:
- At least the memstick image contains an empty fstab
The memstick stuff is new and (mostly) untested, so I'll check that out.
- Does the usage of a "danger
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:00:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:00:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:00:17 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:00:17 - /usr/bin/c
On 03/21/11 05:04, Lars Engels wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:25:36AM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I tested the images listed in the subject and have the following
remarks:
- At least the memstick image contains an empty fstab
- Does the usage of a "dangerously dedikated
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:00:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:00:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:00:23 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:00:23 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:56:04 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:56:04 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:56:04 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:56:10 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 13:56:10 - /usr/bin/c
> I am not sure why this thread has deserved your attention - not everyone has
> as
> good mastery of English as you do. And sometimes some people are more prone
> to
> doubts.
>
>
FYI im not very good in English as its not my main language too. However
constructive
comments are usually int
TB --- 2011-03-21 15:19:34 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 15:19:34 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-03-21 15:19:34 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 15:19:40 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 15:19:40 - /usr
TB --- 2011-03-21 16:09:20 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 16:09:20 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v
TB --- 2011-03-21 16:09:20 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 16:09:25 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 16:09:25 - /usr/b
TB --- 2011-03-21 16:08:58 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 16:08:58 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-03-21 16:08:58 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 16:09:04 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 16:09:04 - /usr
Dear all,
I would like to remind you that the next round of status reports
covering the first quarter of 2011 is due on April 15th, 2011. As this
initiative is very popular among our users, I would like to
ask you to submit your status reports soon, so that we can compile the
report on time.
Do
TB --- 2011-03-21 15:46:41 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 15:46:41 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2011-03-21 15:46:41 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 15:46:46 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 15:46:46 - /u
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:26:19AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>
> Quoting David Demelier (from Mon, 21 Mar
> 2011 07:04:18 +0100):
>
> > On 20/03/2011 17:31, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> >> On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:34:51 +0100 David Demelier
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I w
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 08:41:04PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Roman Divacky wrote:
>
> > This patch:
> >
> >
> > http://lev.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/boot2-mregparm.patch
> >
> >
> > makes boot2 to be compiled with -mregparm=3 (which shrinks it
> > some). It changes CFLAGS to include -mreg
Hi,
[added freebsd-j...@freebsd.org to CC: list]
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:04 AM, David Demelier
wrote:
> On 20/03/2011 17:31, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:34:51 +0100 David Demelier
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I was surprised to see there is no ${MK_JAIL} condit
TB --- 2011-03-21 17:50:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 17:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-03-21 17:50:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 17:50:13 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 17:50:13 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-03-21 17:50:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 17:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-03-21 17:50:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 17:50:13 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 17:50:13 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-03-21 18:46:10 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 18:46:10 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-03-21 18:46:10 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 18:46:19 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 18:46:19 - /usr/bin/c
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:03:52PM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2011-03-21 17:50:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on
> freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2011-03-21 17:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
> TB --- 2011-03-21 17:50:00 - cleaning the object tree
> TB --- 2011-03-2
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
...
- Does the usage of a "dangerously dedikated disklabel" give any advantage?
Not that I can think of -- I'm not sure about maximum disk sizes for pure
BSD-label disks. It's a legitimate option, though, for people doing manual
configuration.
T
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:03:53 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:03:53 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:03:53 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:04:02 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:04:02 - /usr
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:59:34 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:59:34 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:59:34 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:59:43 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:59:43 - /usr
TB --- 2011-03-21 21:04:32 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 21:04:32 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v
TB --- 2011-03-21 21:04:32 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 21:04:42 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 21:04:42 - /usr/b
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:36:32 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:36:32 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:36:32 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:36:45 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 20:36:45 - /u
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:17:23AM -0400, Etienne Robillard wrote:
> Google "cognitive dissonance" for more info...
Google "plonk" for more info.
mcl
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
TB --- 2011-03-21 22:40:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 22:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-03-21 22:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 22:40:16 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 22:40:16 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-03-21 22:40:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 22:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-03-21 22:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 22:40:15 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 22:40:15 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-03-21 23:35:57 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-21 23:35:57 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-03-21 23:35:57 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 23:36:04 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-21 23:36:04 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-03-22 00:53:41 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-22 00:53:41 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-03-22 00:53:41 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-22 00:53:50 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-22 00:53:50 - /usr
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:49:28 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:49:28 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:49:28 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:49:41 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:49:41 - /usr/b
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:49:25 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:49:25 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:49:25 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:49:38 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:49:38 - /usr
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:26:54 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:26:54 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:26:54 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:27:07 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-22 01:27:07 - /u
> >>
> >> I urge you to have a closer look at ral(4) and it's way of handling
> >> RT2500 and RT2600 specific differences. In it's simplest form you can
> >> copy the OpenBSD code 1:1 without any functional changes, heck, it's
> >> the source of this driver anyway.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bernhard
TB --- 2011-03-22 04:26:08 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-03-22 04:26:08 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-03-22 04:26:08 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-03-22 04:26:17 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-03-22 04:26:17 - /usr/bin/c
51 matches
Mail list logo
