FS errors during unmount after dump'ing

Hi! Once in a week I backup my PC using amanda (which uses dump(8)). Subsequently unmounting a filesystem (or during shutdown) I get errors like these: handle_workitem_freeblocks: inode 3579904 block count 384 handle_workitem_freeblocks: inode 3579962 block count 384 /spare: unmount pending erro

Re: FS errors during unmount after dump'ing

[Added fs, please remove current on reply]. On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 08:51:38AM +0100, Christian Gusenbauer wrote: > Hi! > > Once in a week I backup my PC using amanda (which uses dump(8)). Subsequently > unmounting a filesystem (or during shutdown) I get errors like these: > > handle_workitem_fr

Re: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD

Absolutely! Let me know if I've broken anything! Adrian On 5 March 2011 00:45, Urankar Mikael wrote: > On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really > > appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD

Re: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD

On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi all, > > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really > appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test. > > I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few bugs > in the TX path. I

Re: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 19:31, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi all, > > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really > appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test. > > I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few bugs > in the TX path. It's quite pos

Re: tag=. gets me nothing

> I think you are not alone; depending on whether the west (cvsup4) or > east (cvsup5) is closer to you, I'd try a different mirror (as > indicated, .freebsd.org and see). If it's a problem with the mirror > I'd post to http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hubs . i used cvsup.us.free

Re: tag=. gets me nothing

> I am confused by the use of the old cvsup instead of the base system > csup. ancient recipe > 'csup -L2 cvs-supfile 2>&1 | tee cvsup.log' should do the same > thing. even better > I'm a bit confused by the repeated 'default tag=. lines it is a cvs-supfile i use on many systems. the second t

Re: FS errors during unmount after dump'ing

On Saturday 05 March 2011 10:36:40 Kostik Belousov wrote: > [Added fs, please remove current on reply]. > > On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 08:51:38AM +0100, Christian Gusenbauer wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Once in a week I backup my PC using amanda (which uses dump(8)). > > Subsequently unmounting a filesyst

Re: FS errors during unmount after dump'ing

OK, the attachment got lost, so here's the dmesg output: Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD

Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!

28.02.2011 15:24, lhmwzy wrote: Tks for PJD's work for zfs. Would V28 is the last version of zfs because oracle don't open the zfs code after V28? 1. Oracle opens the code, but only after some time. AFAIR they do open the code after the major releases. 2. All head developers have quit Oracle.

Re: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD

On Sat 05 March 2011 at 03:27:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Absolutely! Let me know if I've broken anything! > > Adrian > > On 5 March 2011 00:45, Urankar Mikael wrote: > > > On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > For those of you who are test

Re: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD

What was the previous performance? And which chipsets? Adrian On 6 March 2011 00:30, Urankar Mikael wrote: > On Sat 05 March 2011 at 03:27:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Absolutely! Let me know if I've broken anything! > > > > Adrian > > > > On 5 March 2011 00:45, Urankar Mikael >wrote:

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:10 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:10 - /usr/bin/csu

[PANIC] ffs_alloccg: map corrupted (w/SU+J)

Feb 24 19:43:16 : FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #662 r218815:218845M: Tue Feb 22 00:13:31 PST 2011 Feb 24 19:43:16 : /sys/i386/compile/DRAGON i386 [..] Mar 5 14:41:38 : start = 0, len = 1659, fs = /storage Mar 5 14:41:38 : panic: ffs_alloccg: map corrupted Mar 5 14:41:38 : cpuid = 0 Mar 5 14:41:38 : KDB

Introduce myself and question about getting CURRENT

Hi guys, I'd like to contribute to the FreeBSD community by testing and programming a little in the coming months/years. I'm a mathematician from Berkeley (B.S.), I have been using FreeBSD for about 5 years (on a router and on 2 servers) and I come from a strong programming background (12+ years).

Re: Introduce myself and question about getting CURRENT

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Nerius Landys wrote: > Hi guys, I'd like to contribute to the FreeBSD community by testing > and programming a little in the coming months/years.  I'm a > mathematician from Berkeley (B.S.), I have been using FreeBSD for > about 5 years (on a router and on 2 servers

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:24 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:24 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:28 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:28 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2011-03-06 00:26:09 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-06 00:26:09 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2011-03-06 00:26:09 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-06 00:26:23 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-06 00:26:23 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:28 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-05 23:50:28 - /usr/bin/c

Re: Introduce myself and question about getting CURRENT

Welcome Nerius, hope you enjoy your ride =) You can start with download a snapshot of current from: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ caontains monthly iso, I use FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT-201101-i386-dvd1.iso. br, On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Nerius Landys wrote: > Hi guys, I'd like t

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2011-03-06 01:14:22 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-06 01:14:22 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2011-03-06 01:14:22 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-06 01:14:30 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-06 01:14:30 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2011-03-06 01:15:30 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-06 01:15:30 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2011-03-06 01:15:30 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-06 01:15:48 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-06 01:15:48 - /u

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2011-03-06 01:20:02 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-06 01:20:02 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2011-03-06 01:20:02 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-06 01:20:16 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-06 01:20:16 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2011-03-06 01:14:26 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-06 01:14:26 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2011-03-06 01:14:26 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-06 01:14:36 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-06 01:14:36 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

TB --- 2011-03-06 01:52:41 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-06 01:52:41 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2011-03-06 01:52:41 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-06 01:52:50 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-06 01:52:50 - /usr/b

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:07 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:07 - /usr/bin/csu

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:08 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:08 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:08 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:08 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:08 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-06 02:30:08 - /usr/bin/c

Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Pawel, On 02/27/11 15:29, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > Hi. > > I just committed ZFSv28 to HEAD. > > New major features: > > - Data deduplication. > - Triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3). > - zfs diff. > - zpool split. > - Snapshot holds. > - zpool impo