On 2011-01-07 22:54, Ade Lovett wrote:
Most likely it's low priority given all the other exp-runs that affect
7.x/8.x, tweaking things for an 6.x-EOL-tagged tree, and a bunch of
other infrastructure stuff. Not to mention the impending 7- and 8-
RELEASEs.
I understand, and there will probably a
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Daniel Eischen wrote:
When sending multicast packets to a socket that is _not_
bound to the multicast address, this generates bad UDP
checksums.
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Eischen wrote:
When sending multicast packets to a socket that is _not_
bound to the multicast address, this generates bad UDP
checksums. This use to work and was broke sometime between
the middle of October and late December as far as I can
tell.
My very best guess
On 2011-01-08 01:54, Anonymous wrote:
Looks like lang/sbcl doesn't like new ld(1), here on amd64.
Same error when building using devel/binutils. Can you reproduce?
...
//doing warm init - compilation phase
This is SBCL 1.0.43, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
More information abo
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Eischen wrote:
When sending multicast packets to a socket that is _not_
bound to the multicast address, this generates bad UDP
checksums. This use to work and was broke sometime between
the middle of October and late Decembe
Well done Nathan, very cool! :)
any chance you could post the dmesg output to the list
Sevan / Venture37
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-cur
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Also, are there any restrictions with jail? If we're
in a jail and can't find an address, do we really want
to allow _any_ address set with an MC option? I've
never used jails, but was just wondering if the
application could somehow use an interface ad
Hello Pav,
Den 08/01/2011 kl. 20.34 skrev Pav Lucistnik:
> Package cluster is quite clever, akshully, and since this is OT here,
> just terse comments
Sorry, replied to a bad message... redirecting to current@
>>> 1. adding SSD disks
>
> irrelevant because of bullet 2.
>
>>> 2. source and des
On Jan 8, 2011, at 3:10 PM, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Hello Pav,
>
> Den 08/01/2011 kl. 20.34 skrev Pav Lucistnik:
>
>> Package cluster is quite clever, akshully, and since this is OT here,
>> just terse comments
>
> Sorry, replied to a bad message... redirecting to current@
>
1. adding S
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:30:43PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 20:36:53 +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> > > *But*, it should grok that for err(3) and exit(3). Now there are some
> > > possible remedies:
> Hi,
>
> 1. I have a NFSv4-enabled server with /etc/exports like:
> V4: / -sec=sys
> /home/stud -sec=sys
>
> /etc/rc.conf:
>
> nfs_server_enable=YES
> nfsv4_server_enable=YES
> nfsuserd_enable=YES
>
> Is it possible to run ONLY NFSv4 server (without NFSv3 compatibility)
> ?
You can limit the
11 matches
Mail list logo