Re: [patch and review please] 64 CPU Support

2010-07-26 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2010-Jul-25 15:13:22 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: >On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 13:57 -0700, Kostik Belousov wrote: >> Very low-priority comment (I looked at the patch at the time it was >> posted to stable@). Nice thing about the patch is that it presumably >> identifies all the places that depend on the

amd64 panic snd_hda - hdac_get_capabilities: Invalid corb size (0)

2010-07-26 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On amd64 r210496 I get this panic when booting a kernel with snd_hda(4). I haven't used this driver before, so can't say if this is a regression. (copied by hand) hdac0: irq 16 at device 20.2 on pci0 hdac0: HDA Driver Revision: 20100226_0142 hdac0: [ITHREAD] hdac0: hdac_get_capabilities: Invali

making dependencies breaks between r210462 and r210495?

2010-07-26 Thread David Wolfskill
This is for GENERIC i386 kernel, running on head at r210462, sources updated to r210495: >>> World build started on Mon Jul 26 05:12:42 PDT 2010 >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the o

Re: making dependencies breaks between r210462 and r210495?

2010-07-26 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/26/10 09:55, David Wolfskill wrote: > This is for GENERIC i386 kernel, running on head at r210462, sources > updated to r210495: [ .. ] > ===> usr.bin/kdump (depend) > sh /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/mkioctls /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include > ioctl

Re: [patch and review please] 64 CPU Support

2010-07-26 Thread John Baldwin
On Sunday, July 25, 2010 4:48:53 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > Reposting from -stable. > > Kind of a large patch, but in order to make an omlette, you need to > break a few servers. > > This is a diff against -CURRENT, not stable-8 as I didn't get a chance > to test it. It is directly based off of ch

gnome 2.30 slow startup (Could not ask session manager if shut down is available)

2010-07-26 Thread 裴国兴
Recently, I update my FreeBSD to 8.1, and Found that gnome 2.30 startup very slow. It take one nimus or more to finish startup. When startup, the gnome-panel will display after nautilus about 30 seconds. >From the console, I see that 1、gnome-session[1935]: WARNING: Application 'metacity.desktop'

Re: gnome 2.30 slow startup (Could not ask session manager if shut down is available)

2010-07-26 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On 7/26/10 10:46 AM, 裴国兴 wrote: > Recently, I update my FreeBSD to 8.1, and Found that gnome 2.30 startup very > slow. It take one nimus or more to finish startup. > When startup, the gnome-panel will display after nautilus about 30 seconds. > >>From the console, I see that > > 1、gnome-session[1

Re: amd64 panic snd_hda - hdac_get_capabilities: Invalid corb size (0)

2010-07-26 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 02:24:52PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On amd64 r210496 I get this panic when booting a kernel > with snd_hda(4). I haven't used this driver before, so > can't say if this is a regression. > > (copied by hand) > > hdac0: irq 16 at device 20.2 on > pci0 > hdac0: HD

Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next->prev != elm

2010-07-26 Thread Ståle Kristoffersen
On 2010-07-21 at 20:40, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote: > On 21.07.2010 18:33, Ståle Kristoffersen wrote: > > I -might- have solved my problem. It has now ran for 24h without timeouts, > > and with a bit of load on it. I think I might have ran into the seagate + > > NCQ-problem, even tho

Re: making dependencies breaks between r210462 and r210495?

2010-07-26 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:47:58AM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: > On 07/26/10 09:55, David Wolfskill wrote: > > This is for GENERIC i386 kernel, running on head at r210462, sources > > updated to r210495: > [ .. ] > > > ===> usr.bin/kdump (depend) > > sh /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/mkioctls /usr/obj/u

Re: making dependencies breaks between r210462 and r210495?

2010-07-26 Thread Doug Barton
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, David Wolfskill wrote: I don't know if this is likely to bite enough folks htat updating UPDATING is warranted. The window was small, so probably not. Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://Sup

Re: BSD grep fixes

2010-07-26 Thread b. f.
Other important differences between bsdgrep and GNU grep: The --include option in bsdgrep does not have the same effect as the corresponding option in GNU grep -- in GNU grep, that option causes _only_ those files matching the file inclusion pattern to be searched. To obtain the same behavior in