Re: Why is intr taking up so much cpu?

2010-07-21 Thread Andriy Gapon
Doug, could you please show your timer configuration, part of devinfo -u that describes interrupts and top of the output of top -SPH (including the header) when high interrupt load strikes? P.S. I saw output of top -SH, but I have a reason to be curious about top -SPH. -- Andriy Gapon ___

Re: [panic] Race in IEEE802.11 layer towards device drivers

2010-07-21 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message > From: Hans Petter Selasky > To: PseudoCylon > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sam Leffler ; >freebsd-...@freebsd.org > Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 4:46:34 AM > Subject: Re: [panic] Race in IEEE802.11 layer towards device drivers > > On Tuesday 20 July 2010 12:03:22 P

Re: firefox is stuck in getbuf()

2010-07-21 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 16:29 +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:58:00AM +0800, David Xu wrote: > > With newest -HEAD code, firefox is stuck in getbuf(). > > > > top > > > > last pid: 1814; load averages: 0.00, 0.05, 0.07 > > > >

Re: [panic] Race in IEEE802.11 layer towards device drivers

2010-07-21 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi, Please confirm that this patch is working for you: http://p4web.freebsd.org/@@181261?ac=10 --HPS ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-curren

Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next->prev != elm

2010-07-21 Thread Ståle Kristoffersen
On 2010-07-20 at 14:16, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote: > Sorry for the late response here, but what you're describing matches > fairly well what I saw with RELENG_8 (just after 8.0 was released), but > luckily I didn't have any disks on my MPT, just my tape autoloader. > > Random timeouts,

HPC on FreeBSD - proposal to EPSRC

2010-07-21 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
This post is primarily directed at people in the UK. EPSRC UK (Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council) issued HPC Software Development Call for 2010/11. From their site: "This call invites proposals for High Performance Computing (HPC) software development to

Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next->prev != elm

2010-07-21 Thread Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
On 21.07.2010 18:33, Ståle Kristoffersen wrote: > On 2010-07-20 at 14:16, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote: >> Sorry for the late response here, but what you're describing matches >> fairly well what I saw with RELENG_8 (just after 8.0 was released), but >> luckily I didn't have any disks on m

Re: Why is intr taking up so much cpu?

2010-07-21 Thread Doug Barton
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: Doug, could you please show your timer configuration, Nothing special in /boot/loader.conf, /etc/sysctl.conf, or my kernel. It's basically just GENERIC minus devices I don't have, plus the following: options DDB_CTF options VESA o

Re: Why is intr taking up so much cpu?

2010-07-21 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 21/07/2010 21:50 Doug Barton said the following: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> >> >> Doug, >> >> could you please show your timer configuration, > > Nothing special in /boot/loader.conf, /etc/sysctl.conf, or my kernel. > It's basically just GENERIC minus devices I don't have,

panic with clangbsd kernel in kern/vfs_bio.c

2010-07-21 Thread René Ladan
Hi, on my Acer 7738G laptop running FreeBSD 9.0-amd64 r209980 (with latest clangbsd kernel), I encountered this panic (recovered from /var/log/messages), while doing some moderately light load (portmaster, openoffice, firefox, thunderbird in an xfce4 session): Jul 21 22:29:47 acer kernel: panic:

Re: Why is intr taking up so much cpu?

2010-07-21 Thread Doug Barton
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: I didn't mean your manual tuning, I meant how the system is configured :-) E.g. the relevant sysctl tree. Duh. :) Sorry. sysctl -a | grep timer kern.eventtimer.choice: LAPIC(500) HPET(450) HPET1(440) HPET2(440) i8254(100) RTC(0) kern.eventtimer.et.