Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hi Fabian, On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote: The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool. I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unless problems are discovered. I'm interested in all fee

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Fabian Keil
Lawrence Stewart wrote: > On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote: > > Lawrence Stewart wrote: > > > >> On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > > > >>> The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool. > >>> I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unless problems are >

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2010-06-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-06-20 11:25:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-06-20 11:25:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2010-06-20 11:25:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-06-20 11:25:06 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-06-20 11:25:06 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote: The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool. I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unles

Re: [OpenRD Ultimate] e1000phy(88E1149/88E1121) has a initialize issue

2010-06-20 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
Hi Kristof. On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:13:31 +0200 Kristof Provost wrote: > > I have a OpenRD Ultimate, which has two GbE ports - if_mge(4). But > > I couldn't use mge1 like following. So I tried to investigate. > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Re: [OpenRD Ultimate] e1000phy(88E1149/88E1121) has a initialize issue

2010-06-20 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
Hi yongari. On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:09:23 -0700 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > - - - - - - - > > Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: watchdog timeout > > Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: Timeout on link-up > ^^^

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Fabian Keil
Lawrence Stewart wrote: > On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote: > > Lawrence Stewart wrote: > > > >> On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote: > >>> Lawrence Stewart wrote: > >>> > On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > >>> > > The time has come to solicit some external testing for

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewartwrote: On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote: The time has come to solicit some external testing

Re: [OpenRD Ultimate] e1000phy(88E1149/88E1121) has a initialize issue

2010-06-20 Thread Kristof Provost
On 2010-06-20 21:03:51 (+0900), Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:13:31 +0200 > Kristof Provost wrote: > > > I have a OpenRD Ultimate, which has two GbE ports - if_mge(4). But > > > I couldn't use mge1 like following. So I tried to investigate. > > > - - - - - - - - - - -

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Fabian Keil
Lawrence Stewart wrote: > On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote: > > Lawrence Stewart wrote: > > > >> On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote: > >>> Lawrence Stewart wrote: > >>> > On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote: > > Lawrence Stewartwrote: > > > >> On 06/13/10 18:12, Law

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/20/10 23:15, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewartwrote: On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Fabian Keil
Fabian Keil wrote: > Lawrence Stewart wrote: > > > On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote: > > > Taking pf (and altq) out of the picture doesn't seem to make > > > a difference. > > > > Wouldn't have expected it to. Will be very curious to know if the panic > > is triggered in GENERIC. > > It

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2010-06-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-06-20 13:55:40 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-06-20 13:55:40 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2010-06-20 13:55:40 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-06-20 13:55:45 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-06-20 13:55:45 - /usr

Re: RFC: New event timers infrastructure

2010-06-20 Thread Brandon Gooch
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: > Brandon Gooch wrote: >> I've been testing these patches since the first iteration >> (et.20100606), and I haven't discovered any related issues. > > Thank you! > >> I am unclear about the number of interrupts I should expect from the >> hpe

Re: [OpenRD Ultimate] e1000phy(88E1149/88E1121) has a initialize issue

2010-06-20 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
Hi Kristof. On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:01:00 +0200 Kristof Provost wrote: > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > - - - - - - - > > /* Tell the MAC where to find the PHY so autoneg works */ > > - miisc = LIST_FIRST(&sc->mii->mii_phys); > > -

Re: RFC: New event timers infrastructure

2010-06-20 Thread Alexander Motin
Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: > In by /boot/loader.conf, I now have: > > # Power Saving > kern.hz="100" > #hint.apic.0.clock="0" > #hint.atrtc.0.clock="0" > hint.p4tcc.0.disabled="1" > hint.p4tcc.1.disabled="1" > hint.acpi_throttle.0.disabled="1" >

Re: Dell Perc 5/i Performance issues

2010-06-20 Thread oizs
Could you tell me exactly how did you configure your raid? I mean wb/read-ahead/blocksize/stripe etc. Much appreciated. -zsozso On 2010.06.19. 14:26, Svein Skogen (Listmail Account) wrote: On 19.06.2010 11:58, oizs wrote: I tried almost everything raid 0 1 5 10 with all kind of stripes 32

Re: Dell Perc 5/i Performance issues

2010-06-20 Thread oizs
I've tried almost everything now. The battery is probably fine: mfiutil show battery mfi0: Battery State: Manufacture Date: 7/25/2009 Serial Number: 3716 Manufacturer: SMP-PA1.9 Model: DLFR463 Chemistry: LION Design Capacity: 1800 mAh Design Voltage: 3700 mV C

Re: Dell Perc 5/i Performance issues

2010-06-20 Thread Steven Hartland
Does anyone know of a nice how to guide for achieving this? - Original Message - From: "Scott Long" 2. Partition alignment. If you're using classic MBR slices, everything gets misaligned by 63 sectors, making it impossible for the controller to optimize both reads and writes. If the

page fault with the following non-sleepable locks held: exclusive sleep mutex ATA state lock

2010-06-20 Thread James R. Van Artsdalen
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #1 r209275: Fri Jun 18 08:15:15 CDT 2010 r...@clank.housenet.jrv:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 June 17 -CURRENT This panic was seen under VirtualBox on a Windows host. The VM has 2 cores (the host is a Core i7). I this infrequently under a VM. I have yet to see it o

Re: Dell Perc 5/i Performance issues

2010-06-20 Thread Scott Long
I just set up a machine with the following GPT scheme: =>34 5853511613 mfid0 GPT (2.7T) 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64K) 162 862 - free - (431K) 1024 2097152 2 freebsd-ufs (1.0G) 2098176 4194304 3 freebsd-s

Re: Dell Perc 5/i Performance issues

2010-06-20 Thread Artem Belevich
/dev/random and /dev/urandom are relatively slow and are not suitable as the source of data for testing modern hard drives' sequential throughput. On my 3GHz dual-core amd63 box both /dev/random and /dev/urandom max out at ~80MB/s while consuming 100% CPU time on one of the processor cores. That w

Re: Dell Perc 5/i Performance issues

2010-06-20 Thread Scott Long
Yeah, there's no value in using the /dev/random devices for testing disk i/o. Use /dev/zero instead. I've known of hardware RAID engines in the past that can recognize certain repeating i/o benchmark patterns and optimize for them, but I have no idea if LSI controllers do this, tho based on yo

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Fabian Keil
Fabian Keil wrote: > Fabian Keil wrote: > > My custom kernel normally doesn't have INVARIANTS and WITNESS > > enabled, so I'll try to enable them next. > > The culprit seem to be non-default KTR settings in the kernel > while loading alq as a module. Actually whether or not alq is loaded as a

Bug in debug.ncores sysctl code

2010-06-20 Thread Bruce Cran
I noticed on my i386 router running 9-CURRENT that the "debug.ncores" sysctl appears to get its value from some kernel memory that gets updated frequently: debug.ncores: -936629388 On line 2967 of sys/kern/kern_sig.c should the value of num_cores instead of ncores be getting returned? -- Bruc

Re: RFC: New event timers infrastructure

2010-06-20 Thread Doug Barton
On 06/20/10 08:47, Alexander Motin wrote: While this can be done in sysctl.conf, it would be better to do it in loader.conf to make it applied from the beginning, without on-the-fly timers change. You're probably right that for something this fundamental it's better to do it in loader.conf, ho

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Rui Paulo
On 20 Jun 2010, at 20:36, Fabian Keil wrote: > Fabian Keil wrote: > >> Fabian Keil wrote: > >>> My custom kernel normally doesn't have INVARIANTS and WITNESS >>> enabled, so I'll try to enable them next. >> >> The culprit seem to be non-default KTR settings in the kernel >> while loading alq

Re: Bug in debug.ncores sysctl code

2010-06-20 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 08:38:37PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: > I noticed on my i386 router running 9-CURRENT that the "debug.ncores" sysctl > appears to get its value from some kernel memory that gets updated frequently: > > debug.ncores: -936629388 > > On line 2967 of sys/kern/kern_sig.c should

Re: Dell Perc 5/i Performance issues

2010-06-20 Thread Antony Mawer
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Scott Long wrote: > I just set up a machine with the following GPT scheme: > > =>        34  5853511613  mfid0  GPT  (2.7T) >          34         128      1  freebsd-boot  (64K) >         162         862         - free -  (431K) >        1024     2097152      2  fr

[RFC] Changes in stat structures

2010-06-20 Thread Gabor PALI
Hello, I would like to integrate my Google Summer of Code project from the last year [1]. In brief, it was about converting netstat(1) into a library and providing a relatively clean API to access various networking statistics available in the kernel. The project is far from being complete, and

Re: RFC: New event timers infrastructure

2010-06-20 Thread Brandon Gooch
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 06/20/10 08:47, Alexander Motin wrote: >> >> While this can be done in sysctl.conf, it would be better to do it in >> loader.conf to make it applied from the beginning, without on-the-fly >> timers change. > > You're probably right that for

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/21/10 00:12, Fabian Keil wrote: Fabian Keil wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote: Taking pf (and altq) out of the picture doesn't seem to make a difference. Wouldn't have expected it to. Will be very curious to know if the panic is triggered in GENE

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2010-06-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-06-21 01:50:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-06-21 01:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2010-06-21 01:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-06-21 01:50:07 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-06-21 01:50:07 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: [CFT] SIFTR - Statistical Information For TCP Research: Uncle Lawrence needs YOU!

2010-06-20 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/21/10 05:44, Rui Paulo wrote: On 20 Jun 2010, at 20:36, Fabian Keil wrote: Fabian Keil wrote: Fabian Keil wrote: My custom kernel normally doesn't have INVARIANTS and WITNESS enabled, so I'll try to enable them next. The culprit seem to be non-default KTR settings in the kernel

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2010-06-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-06-21 04:21:31 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-06-21 04:21:31 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2010-06-21 04:21:31 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-06-21 04:21:37 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-06-21 04:21:37 - /usr

Re: RFC: New event timers infrastructure

2010-06-20 Thread Alexander Motin
Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 06/20/10 08:47, Alexander Motin wrote: >>> While this can be done in sysctl.conf, it would be better to do it in >>> loader.conf to make it applied from the beginning, without on-the-fly >>> timers change. >> You're p