On 16 Apr 2010, at 10:29, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 16/04/2010 04:19 Arseny Nasokin said the following:
On 16 Apr 2010, at 03:03, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 16/04/2010 01:27 Arseny Nasokin said the following:
I get error in same point when I try compile amd64 current
GENERIC on
i386 machine
on 16/04/2010 10:38 Arseny Nasokin said the following:
>
> kernel-toolchain target must be called on cross-compilling, even you
> making cross-world (where toolchain is called)
Still not sure what is the problem.
Before cross-compiling a kernel you have to cross-build either the corresponding
wor
Quoting Navdeep Parhar (from Wed, 14 Apr 2010
11:35:40 -0700):
Have you or anyone else ever used buildkernel successfully with
"makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes" in the conf file? Something as simple as
this does not work for me:
Copy&paste patch, tabs probbly mangled:
---snip---
Index: Makefile.i
Hi,
ClangBSD is a branch of FreeBSD that aims at integrating clang (clang.llvm.org)
into FreeBSD, replacing GCC as a system compiler.
Recently, we've achieved the state when clang can compile all of FreeBSD world
on i386/amd64 platforms (including all the C++ apps we have and itself)
and a bootab
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Roman Divacky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ClangBSD is a branch of FreeBSD that aims at integrating clang
> (clang.llvm.org)
> into FreeBSD, replacing GCC as a system compiler.
>
> Recently, we've achieved the state when clang can compile all of FreeBSD world
> on i386/amd64
> Recently, we've achieved the state when clang can compile all of FreeBSD world
> on i386/amd64 platforms (including all the C++ apps we have and itself)
> and a bootable kernel. Thus we feel that the time has come to ask the FreeBSD
> community for wider testing on i386/amd64 (you sure can help w
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Juanito Cassemiro wrote:
Hi.
I want to know if the IBM, HP or Supermicro Servers are compatible
with FreeBSD OS. Could you send me a hardware compatibility list with
compatible servers?
It depends on server model, not on manufacturer in general.
I have some IBM, HP,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ClangBSD is a branch of FreeBSD that aims at integrating clang (
> clang.llvm.org)
> into FreeBSD, replacing GCC as a system compiler.
>
> Recently, we've achieved the state when clang can compile all of FreeBSD
> world
> on i386/amd
Hi--
On Apr 16, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
> can someone explain the benefit other then not relying on gcc now ?
> performance ?
http://clang.llvm.org/comparison.html
http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/
Regards,
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-curren
Roman Divacky wrote:
We kindly ask you to setup ClangBSD chroot and/or use clang compiled kernel and
use it as you would normally use FreeBSD. Please report back
I have a buildworld error here:
clang -isystem /usr/obj/mt/clangbsd/tmp/usr/include/clang/1.5 -isystem
/usr/obj/mt/clangbsd/tmp/u
Ivan Voras wrote:
Roman Divacky wrote:
We kindly ask you to setup ClangBSD chroot and/or use clang compiled
kernel and use it as you would normally use FreeBSD. Please report back
I have a buildworld error here:
clang -isystem /usr/obj/mt/clangbsd/tmp/usr/include/clang/1.5 -isystem
/usr/ob
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:21:29AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > /mt/clangbsd/lib/libc/sys/stack_protector.c:88:19: error: format string
> > is not a string literal (potentially insecure) [-Wformat-security]
> > syslog(LOG_CRIT, msg);
> > ^~~
> > 1 diagnostic genera
Rink Springer wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:21:29AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
/mt/clangbsd/lib/libc/sys/stack_protector.c:88:19: error: format string
is not a string literal (potentially insecure) [-Wformat-security]
syslog(LOG_CRIT, msg);
^~~
1 diagnostic ge
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Rink Springer wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:21:29AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
/mt/clangbsd/lib/libc/sys/stack_protector.c:88:19: error: format string
is not a string literal (potentially insecure) [-Wformat-security]
Hi,
It is apparently not possible to make use of -use-the-force-luke=4gms
on FreeBSD when appending new session after 4GB. Mounted disk
afterwards show nothing.
Should we allow it like linux does?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
On 4/16/2010 3:27 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> first off all it would have been easier to figure a few things out, if
> the several different things had been individual commits
I considered that but given that the changes had to happen at the sam
Can I get a review for this?
summary:
If doing compressed cores and there is an error, we leak
resources unless this is fixed.
Index: imgact_elf.c
===
--- imgact_elf.c(revision 206498)
+++ imgact_elf.c(working copy
17 matches
Mail list logo
