BIND from system and from ports

2010-04-07 Thread Eir Nym
All is good in BIND in system, except it depends on ports tree with various options. I have to do followed algorithm, to enable these options: 1) make and install base system 2) install needed dependencies from ports tree 3) rebuild and reinstall world This is more complex than: 1) make and instal

Re: BIND from system and from ports

2010-04-07 Thread Arseny Nasokin
On 7 Apr 2010, at 13:47, Eir Nym wrote: All is good in BIND in system, except it depends on ports tree with various options. WITH_BIND_XML and WITH_BIND_IDN I have to do followed algorithm, to enable these options: 1) make and install base system 2) install needed dependencies from ports

Re: When will we can use ZFS v24?

2010-04-07 Thread krad
On 7 April 2010 05:38, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:35 PM, lhmwzy wrote: > > > What's your mean?? > > > > See the archives for the freebsd-fs mailing list. There are two separate > groups working on getting ZFSv22 added to FreeBSD 9-CURRENT. And there's > work ongoing to get

[RFC] Rewriting sade(8)

2010-04-07 Thread Andrey V . Elsukov
Hi, All. Some days ago i begun rewriting sade(8) to libgeom(3). Just for fun :-) Today i have progress and you can see some screenshoots here: http://butcher.heavennet.ru/sade/ What is done: 1. It's fully rewritten, but yes, i reuse some code from old sade. 2. I wrote small framework "customdlg"

Re: When will we can use ZFS v24?

2010-04-07 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Apr 07), krad said: > On 7 April 2010 05:38, Freddie Cash wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:35 PM, lhmwzy wrote: > > > What's your mean?? > > > > See the archives for the freebsd-fs mailing list. There are two > > separate groups working on getting ZFSv22 added to FreeBSD

Re: [RFC] Rewriting sade(8)

2010-04-07 Thread Randi Harper
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > Hi, All. > > Some days ago i begun rewriting sade(8) to libgeom(3). Just for fun :-) > Today i have progress and you can see some screenshoots here: > http://butcher.heavennet.ru/sade/ > > What is done: > 1. It's fully rewritten, but yes,

Re: [RFC] Rewriting sade(8)

2010-04-07 Thread Alex Kozlov
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 10:49:35AM -0700, Randi Harper wrote: > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > > Hi, All. > > > > Some days ago i begun rewriting sade(8) to libgeom(3). Just for fun :-) > > Today i have progress and you can see some screenshoots here: > > http://butcher

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2010-04-07 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:26 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:26 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2010-04-07 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:30 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:30 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2010-04-07 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:33 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:33 - /usr/bin

Re: HEADS UP: COMPAT_IA32 renamed COMPAT_FREEBSD32

2010-04-07 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 11:24:21 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > pluknet wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the interesting part for me is how to properly assert now a value of e.g. > > KINFO_PROC_SIZE varying on err.. different COMPAT_FREEBSD32 arches > > (say, FreeBSD would have _kern_proc FreeBSD32 compat lay

Re: [RFC] Rewriting sade(8)

2010-04-07 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 07.04.2010 21:49, Randi Harper wrote: Wow. This is awesome. patches? :D :) I'm not ready yet to publish code. I planned to announce this RFC a bit later, when code will be finished. But Konstantin (kib@) suggested do it before finishing. I've been working on moving sysinstall from libdisk

Re: [RFC] Rewriting sade(8)

2010-04-07 Thread Bruce Cran
On Thursday 08 April 2010 06:25:47 Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > I'm not ready yet to publish code. I planned to announce this RFC > a bit later, when code will be finished. But Konstantin (kib@) suggested > do it before finishing. That's a shame. As long as the source isn't available it's of little

Re: [RFC] Rewriting sade(8)

2010-04-07 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 08.04.2010 10:27, Bruce Cran wrote: That's a shame. As long as the source isn't available it's of little interest to me. For anyone who wants to see the bits of code I've got so far, I've created a Google Code project at http://code.google.com/p/gcpart/ . I'm currently trying to figure out ho