Re: panic: mutex vm object not owned at ../../../vm/vm_page.c:762

2003-10-08 Thread Alan Cox
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 02:30:30AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I got this upon attempting to burn a CD with cdrecord on my > freshly-updated current machine: > > panic: mutex vm object not owned at ../../../vm/vm_page.c:762 > This should now be fixed. Alan > syncing disks, buffers remaining.

Re: ATAng doesn't boot on my notebook - panic

2003-10-08 Thread Vladimir B. Grebenschikov
В вт, 07.10.2003, в 23:26, Soren Schmidt пишет: > It seems Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > > > Any solution or workaround ? > > Try this patch please: > > diff -u -r1.191 ata-all.c Does not help, another panic in ad_attach: ... GEOM: create disk ad1 dp=0xc2358a70 ad1: ATA-0 disk at ata1-mas

Re: panic: mutex vm object not owned at ../../../vm/vm_page.c:762

2003-10-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:16:52AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 02:30:30AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > I got this upon attempting to burn a CD with cdrecord on my > > freshly-updated current machine: > > > > panic: mutex vm object not owned at ../../../vm/vm_page.c:762 > >

Re: ATAng doesn't boot on my notebook - panic

2003-10-08 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > Does not help, another panic in ad_attach: ARGH, try this instead: diff -u -r1.191 ata-all.c --- ata-all.c 7 Oct 2003 13:44:15 - 1.191 +++ ata-all.c 8 Oct 2003 08:03:09 - @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include

no partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread ecsd
Here are the contents of my /dev. As you can see, there are no entries for the partitions of ad3. My 5.0 system has no "bsdlabel" command. Can anyone tell me how I can coax the ad3s1* entries into existence? ./ ad2s1c dspW0.1 pci stdin@ ttypg ..

Re: no partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread Harti Brandt
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, ecsd wrote: e>Here are the contents of my /dev. As you can see, there are no entries e>for the e>partitions of ad3. My 5.0 system has no "bsdlabel" command. Can anyone e>tell me how I can coax the ad3s1* entries into existence? You probably need to fdisk(8) your disk first. Th

Re: no partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread ecsd
I had already been able to go so far as to "disklabel -w -r ad3 auto". After doing this on a 4.X system I would then "disklabel -e /dev/ad3s1c", but /dev/ad3s1c does not exist, so I am stuck. Maybe there is a "rescan devices" command? fdisk thinks it has no work to do: *** Working on device

Re: no partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread Harti Brandt
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, ecsd wrote: e>I had already been able to go so far as to "disklabel -w -r ad3 auto". e>After doing this e>on a 4.X system I would then "disklabel -e /dev/ad3s1c", but /dev/ad3s1c e>does e>not exist, so I am stuck. Maybe there is a "rescan devices" command? e> e>fdisk thinks it

Re: savecore: first and last dump headers disagree on /dev/ad0b

2003-10-08 Thread YONETANI Tomokazu
On 2003/10/07 18:11:30, Doug White wrote: > On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, YONETANI Tomokazu wrote: > > > The hardware is IBM NetFinity 6000R, and it has ServerWorks ROSB4 UDMA33 > > controller, to which the IDE disk is attached. The size of the IDE hard > > disk is 4Gbytes, and the size of the kernel dump a

Re: Proliant 1600R Install Failure (ida + SMPng to blame?)

2003-10-08 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Edward Aronyk wrote: > Booting off the 5.1 boot floppies gives a page fault about 15 seconds > after the mfsroot floppy finishes loading. Boot off of a -CURRENT snapshot; 5.1 shipped with a broken IDA driver. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/

Re: no partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread ecsd
Harti Brandt wrote: On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, ecsd wrote: e>I had already been able to go so far as to "disklabel -w -r ad3 auto". e>After doing this on a 4.X system I would then "disklabel -e /dev/ad3s1c" e>but /dev/ad3s1c does not exist, so I am stuck. e>Maybe there is a "rescan devices" command? e>

Re: no partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread Harti Brandt
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, ecsd wrote: e>Harti Brandt wrote: e>On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, ecsd wrote: e>e>I had already been able to go so far as to "disklabel -w -r ad3 auto". e>e>After doing this on a 4.X system I would then "disklabel -e /dev/ad3s1c" e>e>but /dev/ad3s1c does not exist, so I am stuck. e>e>May

[current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2003-10-08 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-10-08 09:25:40 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2003-10-08 09:25:40 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-10-08 09:29:09 - building world TB --- cd /home

Re: cannot create partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread ecsd
Given that FreeBSD 5.1 is on the shelf in a box at CompUSA for sale to the general public, I think the proper thing to do is address the matter of documenting the revised operation of the devices in 5.X, rather than tell people to downgrade if they don't understand the behavior of their system, bes

Re: cannot create partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread Harti Brandt
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, ecsd wrote: e>Given that FreeBSD 5.1 is on the shelf in a box at CompUSA for sale to the e>general public, I think the proper thing to do is address the matter of e>documenting the revised operation of the devices in 5.X, rather than tell e>people to downgrade if they don't und

Re: cannot create partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread Derek Ragona
If you read the early adopters doc at: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.1R/early-adopter.html You will se it clearly says: "MAKEDEV is no longer available, nor is it required. FreeBSD 5.X uses a device filesystem, which automatically creates device nodes on demand. For more information, please

Re: cannot create partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread ecsd
Derek Ragona wrote: If you read the early adopters doc at: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.1R/early-adopter.html You will se it clearly says: "MAKEDEV is no longer available, nor is it required. FreeBSD 5.X uses a device filesystem, which automatically creates device nodes on demand. For mor

Why is em nic generating interrupts?

2003-10-08 Thread Michael O. Boev
Hello, everyone! I've got a [uniprocessor 5.1-RELEASE] router machine with fxp and em nics. I've built my kernel with the following included: options DEVICE_POLLING options HZ=2500 and enabled polling in /etc/sysctl.conf. Having looked through a vmstat -i output I see that the e

Re: no driver attached messsage

2003-10-08 Thread Bob
That is because there is no driver for that specific hardware. If FreeBSD supports them, you need to recompile kernel with appropriate drivers or dynamically load them. As for the unsupported devices, (like winmodems), you can't help it. -- Babak Farrokhi Dikshie wrote: why my dmesg always sh

Re: cannot create partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread jon
Hiya > I read that too. That appears to be just about all the information about > the new devfs that there is, > short of reading the source code. If you look in /usr/share/doc (or someplace like that) there's a document describing the rationale behind devfs and its implementation - it's geared

Re: Atmel AT76C503 USB 802.11b device driver

2003-10-08 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:59:40AM +0100, Stuart Walsh wrote: > Aww crap, my apologies for the duplicate email.. sendmail appears to be > on steroids or something. The messages are sumited twice by your mailclient - it's not the MTAs fault. See that there are several minutes between them and that

Re: Atmel AT76C503 USB 802.11b device driver

2003-10-08 Thread Stuart Walsh
On Wed Oct 08, 05:27P +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:59:40AM +0100, Stuart Walsh wrote: > > Aww crap, my apologies for the duplicate email.. sendmail appears to be > > on steroids or something. > > The messages are sumited twice by your mailclient - it's not the MTAs > fau

Re: cannot create partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
>> I read that too. That appears to be just about all the information about >> the new devfs that there is, >> short of reading the source code. You shouldn't need to do that. You can, more or less entirely forget about DEVFS unless you are a device driver writer. If you needed to run mknod(8)

Nvidia driver

2003-10-08 Thread Justin Smith
> Ahh! > Here is a fragment of my loader.conf.. > nvidia_load="YES" > machdep.disable_mtrrs="1" > hw.nvidia.registry.ReqAGPRate="1" > > > Although this fix alloes me to start up the nvidia driver, the machine still reboots when I run certain apps (openuniverse, for instance) and at random times

i865 Video Memory

2003-10-08 Thread David Malone
It seems some recent Dell machines have the amount of video memory available set to 1MB by default. The desktop machines allow you to set this in the BIOS, but the laptops don't seem to allow you to adjust this. Christian Zietz has a hack for Linux that convinces the BIOS to let you use more memory

[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-10-08 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-10-08 16:00:01 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-10-08 16:00:01 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-10-08 16:01:52 - building world TB --- cd /

Upgrading 5.1 to latest -> page fault in kernel (crash) upon starting X

2003-10-08 Thread Ewald Jenisch
Hi, Seems like I'm running into a serious problem upgrading my 5.1 machine to the latest level: The symptoms: I did an upgrade (cvsup) then went through the usual build/install cycle (see below). When I boot the new kernel everything runs straight up to the moment when I start X-Windows. When

Re: no partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, ecsd wrote: > The chronology is that I booted the system, did the disklabel -w -r ad3 > auto, turned around to disklabel -e /dev/ad3s1c (as I would normally > do), and was told that /dev/ad3s1c did not exist. Then I wrote in here > asking for help. ad3s1c does not exist. Since

Re: no partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:20:16AM -0700, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, ecsd wrote: > > > The chronology is that I booted the system, did the disklabel -w -r ad3 > > auto, turned around to disklabel -e /dev/ad3s1c (as I would normally > > do), and was told that /dev/ad3s1c

RE: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT, IBM T30)

2003-10-08 Thread Robert Ferguson
I see this problem as well. I'm running on a T40, with a DVD/CDRW in the ultrabay, and -CURRENT as of this morning. At boot, it hangs immediately after ad0: 35174MB [71465/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 ata1: resetting devices .. done Backing out the most recent checkin to sys/dev/ata/ata-queu

Re: Atmel AT76C503 USB 802.11b device driver

2003-10-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 16:49:34 +0100 Stuart Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > They were, yes. But once when the sendmail daemon wasn't running. I > checked the mail queue before i sent it again and it wasn't there. > Perhaps sendmail stores failed mail somewhere I'm not familiar with. > EUSERERROR

UDMA33 on older acer aladdin chips

2003-10-08 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Hi, I recently decided to update my alpha UP1000 to today's current from a mid-July build. However, UDMA33 did not work on a hard disk attached to the built-in Acer Aladdin controller (verbose dmesg appended). I think I have narrowed the problem down to this line of code: atadev->chann

Re: Atmel AT76C503 USB 802.11b device driver

2003-10-08 Thread Stuart Walsh
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 16:49:34 +0100 > Stuart Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > They were, yes. But once when the sendmail daemon wasn't running. I > > checked the mail queue before i sent it again and it wasn't there. > > Perhaps sendmail stores failed mail somewhere I'm not familiar with. >

Re: no partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, ecsd wrote: > > e>I had already been able to go so far as to "disklabel -w -r ad3 auto". This is in error and should have been: fdisk -i -u /dev/ad3 [add a partition 1] disklabel -r -w ad3s1 auto he has a disklabel directly on the

Re: no partition entries for /dev/ad3

2003-10-08 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, ecsd wrote: > Harti Brandt wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, ecsd wrote: > e>I had already been able to go so far as to "disklabel -w -r ad3 auto". > e>After doing this on a 4.X system I would then "disklabel -e /dev/ad3s1c" > e>but /dev/ad3s1c does not exist, so I am stuck. > e>M

Re: Nvidia driver

2003-10-08 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Justin Smith wrote: > > > Ahh! > > Here is a fragment of my loader.conf.. > > nvidia_load="YES" > > machdep.disable_mtrrs="1" > > hw.nvidia.registry.ReqAGPRate="1" > > Although this fix alloes me to start up the nvidia driver, the machine > still reboots when I run certain app

if_em panic

2003-10-08 Thread Daniel Eischen
One of my buddies is having panics with if_em after the last set of changes a couple of weeks ago. He runs dhclient on the interface to get a lease from a cable modem. The panic is a recurse on a non-recursive mutex. I haven't gotten a traceback from him yet, but a little perusing through the so

Re: if_em panic

2003-10-08 Thread Sam Leffler
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 05:27 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote: > One of my buddies is having panics with if_em after the last > set of changes a couple of weeks ago. He runs dhclient > on the interface to get a lease from a cable modem. The > panic is a recurse on a non-recursive mutex. I haven't

Re: Nvidia driver

2003-10-08 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thursday 09 October 2003 01:41, Justin Smith wrote: > > Ahh! > > Here is a fragment of my loader.conf.. > > nvidia_load="YES" > > machdep.disable_mtrrs="1" > > hw.nvidia.registry.ReqAGPRate="1" > > Although this fix alloes me to start up the nvidia driver, the machine > still reboots when I run

Re: savecore: first and last dump headers disagree on /dev/ad0b

2003-10-08 Thread Doug White
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 06:11:30PM -0700, Doug White wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, YONETANI Tomokazu wrote: > > > > > The hardware is IBM NetFinity 6000R, and it has ServerWorks ROSB4 UDMA33 > > > controller, to which the IDE disk is attached. The size o

Re: savecore: first and last dump headers disagree on /dev/ad0b

2003-10-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:05:49PM -0700, Doug White wrote: > > > The ROSB4 is known to have data-corruption problems with running in UDMA > > > mode. The dump is probably tripping over this, which is why Tor's patch > > > works since it demotes the device back to PIO. > > > > I also had problems

Re: UDMA33 on older acer aladdin chips

2003-10-08 Thread Daniel Rock
Andrew Gallatin wrote: Hi, I recently decided to update my alpha UP1000 to today's current from a mid-July build. However, UDMA33 did not work on a hard disk attached to the built-in Acer Aladdin controller (verbose dmesg appended). I think I have narrowed the problem down to this line of code:

ath0 point-to-ponit (turbo mode)

2003-10-08 Thread Marcos Biscaysaqu
Hi There. I have 2 PCI wireless card with the Atheros chipset some one know how can i setup a point-to-point with 2 of this wireless card on Freebsd, I could made work Access Point client, but i couln't adhoc turbo mode 11a thanks -- Marcos Biscaysaqu Systems Administrator ThePacific.Net L

Re: ath0 point-to-ponit (turbo mode)

2003-10-08 Thread Sam Leffler
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 08:45 pm, Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote: > Hi There. > I have 2 PCI wireless card with the Atheros chipset some one know > how can i setup a point-to-point with 2 of this wireless card on > Freebsd, I could made work Access Point client, but i couln't adhoc > turbo mode 1

Sched_Ule

2003-10-08 Thread Scott Sipe
Hi, I see some posts from late Sept about people having issues with SCHED_ULE. I just wanted to add in that I am having the exact same problems. In short: Anything that seems disk intensive: bzip2 (unbzip2ing one big file makes this happen), making world, building ports, etc makes my X environm

ipnat memory leak?

2003-10-08 Thread Vector
I was using ipfw and natd but I wanted to move nat into the kernel so I recompiled with ipfilter and ipnat. Now, after terminating natd, and setting up ipnat rules in /etc/ipnat.rules, I see memory increase at a rate of just under 1MB per minutes. Has anyone else seen a memory leak in ipnat or ip

Can not remove directory

2003-10-08 Thread Boris Kovalenko
Hello! Can not remove directory /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 rm: /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1: Directory not empty bash-2.05b# pwd; ls -la /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Oct 9 08:54 . drwxr-xr-x 13 root wheel 512 Oct 9 08:54 .. bas

Re: Can not remove directory

2003-10-08 Thread Proc
man rm Note -r and -f. Boris Kovalenko wrote: Hello! Can not remove directory /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 rm: /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1: Directory not empty bash-2.05b# pwd; ls -la /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Oct 9 08:54 . drwx

Re: Can not remove directory

2003-10-08 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Oct 09), Boris Kovalenko said: > Can not remove directory /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 > rm: /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1: Directory not empty > > bash-2.05b# pwd; ls -la > /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 > total 4 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Oct 9 08:

Mar 2003 - Sep 2003 FreeBSD Status Report

2003-10-08 Thread Scott Long
Navigation Bar March-September 2003 Status Report Introduction: The FreeBSD Bi-monthly status reports are back! In this edition, we catch up on seven highly productive months and look forward to the end of 2003. As always, the FreeBSD development

Re: Can not remove directory

2003-10-08 Thread Boris Kovalenko
Hello! I know about -r and -f options. They don't help. Proc wrote: man rm Note -r and -f. Boris Kovalenko wrote: Hello! Can not remove directory /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 rm: /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1: Directory not empty bash-2.05b# pwd; ls -la /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/

Re: Can not remove directory

2003-10-08 Thread Boris Kovalenko
Hello! Seems You are right: BAD INODE NUMBER FOR '.' I=353381 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Oct 9 08:54 2003 DIR=/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no Will reboot and run fsck manually. Thanks for advance! Yours truly, Boris Kovalenko Dan Nels

Re: ipnat memory leak?

2003-10-08 Thread Vector
Several reasons: Having it in the kernel improves performance natd chokes on the latest windoze worms and I have implemented some DoS prevention/worm protection in ipnat but I'm seeing this memory leak without my improvements there at all. If it's in the kernel, ipnat is kept under control when

Re: ipnat memory leak?

2003-10-08 Thread Vector
Several reasons: Having it in the kernel improves performance natd chokes on the latest windoze worms and I have implemented some DoS prevention/worm protection in ipnat but I'm seeing this memory leak without my improvements there at all. If it's in the kernel, ipnat is kept under control when