On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 12:24:27AM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
> >
> > Yes, it's normal. The commit log clearly states that the new
> > watermarks do nothing for now. I have a patch that changes that but I
> > haven't committed it yet because I left for vacation last Sunday and I
> >
I thought nwfs used it?
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Tim Robbins wrote:
> Is there a compelling reason why I shouldn't remove netns? That is, does
> it serve a purpose now that it could not serve if it was moved to the
> Attic?
>
>
> Tim
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsub
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Tim Robbins wrote:
> Is there a compelling reason why I shouldn't remove netns? That is, does
> it serve a purpose now that it could not serve if it was moved to the
> Attic?
netns could be safely moved to Attic. I'm receive enough IPX
related questions, and never got
John Wilson wrote:
Good day,
After spending quite some time trying to get
5.0-RELEASE installed on a Dell PowerEdge machine, it
seems that all is now working quite well. Being that
these machines are somewhat common, I'll share what
was halting my installation.
What model? There are quite a few
--- Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Dell PowerEdge]
> What model? There are quite a few PowerEdges out
It's a 600SC - P4 1.8 - Perc3/SC
Since new, I've added a Plextor CD-RW (IDE), Lite-On
DVD-ROM (IDE), and an ATI All-In-Wonder VE (7500,
PCI).
> > These machines come with integrated vid
Good day,
After spending quite some time trying to get
5.0-RELEASE installed on a Dell PowerEdge machine, it
seems that all is now working quite well. Being that
these machines are somewhat common, I'll share what
was halting my installation.
These machines come with integrated video, an ATI
Rag
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
