hi,
I have installed FreeBSD 4.7R on a compaq proliant
dl360 G3 to find out that the nics are not being
recognized.. has this been dealt with in current ?
--
Does artificial plants need artificial water ?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the bo
On Saturday 22 February 2003 08:55 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> Just in case anyone tries to build today's current and sees
> it fail because of boot2, you can always set BOOT2_UFS=UFS1_ONLY
> or BOOT2_UFS=UFS2_ONLY in your make.conf and rebuild.
I added BOOT2_UFS=UFS2_ONLY to my make.conf, and
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> I'v cvsup'ed from 5.0-RELEASE to RELENG_5_0_0 last night and ACPI doesn't
> work now.
> When booting I'v got a message: "ACPI autoload failed - no such file or
> directory".
>
> How to fix?
That's saying the acpi.ko module was not built and installed.
When you install
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:18:42PM -0800, Terry Lambert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought this was the default in 5.x GENERIC; has someone turned
> these options off in the default config?!?
>
> I certainly haven't seen changes to locore.s, pmap.c, and machdep.c
> that would fix the problem
Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:18:42PM -0800, Terry Lambert
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I thought this was the default in 5.x GENERIC; has someone turned
> > these options off in the default config?!?
> >
> > I certainly haven't seen changes to locore.s, pmap.c, and machdep
>
> > I thought this was the default in 5.x GENERIC; has someone turned
> > these options off in the default config?!?
> >
> > I certainly haven't seen changes to locore.s, pmap.c, and machdep.c
> > that would fix the problem by working around the CPU bug.
>
> Can't say anything for Paul's case,
Hello Soeren,
I am sorry, but the last demsg output I have sent was not complete. I
had captured that from /var/log/messages which does not seem to contain
everything...
Enclosed is a new one done with a serial console. Here I think the
culprit can be seen as lines like:
(probe2:ata2:0:0:0):
It seems Michael Class wrote:
> Hello Soeren,
>
> I am sorry, but the last demsg output I have sent was not complete. I
> had captured that from /var/log/messages which does not seem to contain
> everything...
>
> Enclosed is a new one done with a serial console. Here I think the
> culprit can
Hi!
Here on my system it does not help :-(, I've never had atapicam configured.
Christian.
On Sunday, 23. February 2003 11:17, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Michael Class wrote:
> > Hello Soeren,
> >
> > I am sorry, but the last demsg output I have sent was not complete. I
> > had captured th
Thank you for your info., Giorgos.
BOOT2_UFS=UFS1_ONLY in /etc/make.conf made my buildworld OK.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Michael Class wrote:
> > Hello Soeren,
> >
> > I am sorry, but the last demsg output I have sent was not complete. I
> > had captured that from /var/log/messages which does not seem to contain
> > everything...
> >
> > Enclosed is a new one don
use the latest RELENG_4
L. Jankok ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have installed FreeBSD 4.7R on a compaq proliant
> dl360 G3 to find out that the nics are not being
> recognized.. has this been dealt with in current ?
>
> --
> Does artificial plants need artificial water ?
>
> To Unsubs
> That's saying the acpi.ko module was not built and installed.
>
> When you install your new kernel, use the Makefile target, instead
> of using "cp", or it won't install the modules it builds.
>
> If you did this, then check your make.conf to see if you are
> specifically telling it to not build
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Yamada Ken Takeshi wrote:
> I have the following error with make buildworld since
> Feb. 21th, 0900GMT with my P3x2 box.
>
> boot2 seems exceeding the size limit, any fix?
Same here, with the sources of today (upped en builded twice, but both
time's the same error)
Regar
Can somebody please use "cvs update -D " to do a binary search and
identify which exact commit caused the problem ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice
Hi
I've had a resurgence of these starting a few days ago. Basically
whenever there is fairly heavy IO (I mean as heavy as IO can get on
a COM port) the console starts spewing these messages.
[brane-dead] ~ # uptime
5:05PM up 1 day, 8:39, 1 user, load averages: 2.02, 2.10, 2.09
[brane-dead] ~
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
Sun Feb 23 03:38:01 EST 2003
cvs [update aborted]: /work/repo/CVSROOT: No such file or directory
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sunday, 23. February 2003 14:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can somebody please use "cvs update -D " to do a binary search and
> identify which exact commit caused the problem ?
The kernel of '2/20/2003 19:55 GMT' boots fine, but the kernel of '2/20/2003
20:03 GMT' doesn't. The commits in betw
At Sat, 22 Feb 2003 08:08:59 +0100,
Christian Gusenbauer wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I've just cvsupped current and rebuilt world and now I'm getting this error
> when I boot with the new kernel. I had a look at the archives and found out
> that such a problem existed in January, too and I verified, tha
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
Sun Feb 23 11:38:00 EST 2003
cvs [update aborted]: /work/repo/CVSROOT: No such file or directory
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
It seems that I managed to break the tagged queueing support somehow,
so please disable tags while I look hunt for the problem..
I'll commit a disable tags patch to -current in a few...
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the m
I have corrected a number of problems on Serverworks & ALI chipsets
and it has been committed to -current.
There is an outstanding problem with having tags enabled on ATA disks,
and I have temporarily disabled tags support until I nail that nasty
problem.
So please update your sources and let me
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, David Syphers wrote:
David,
> I added BOOT2_UFS=UFS2_ONLY to my make.conf, and my buildworld still dies in
> boot2. I'm trying to upgrade from a Feb. 19 -current (because it's crashing
> all the time, and I need to enable debugging stuff). Is there a fix, or would
> other inf
On 2003-02-22 22:49, Andre Guibert de Bruet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find myself waiting up to two seconds for data to flush to the terminal
> on a 28 line 'ls -l'. net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack doesn't appear to cause
> this behavior on 4.7-stable. Did we inadvertently break the 100ms clause
> w
e things
> work without delays you should (temporarily) enable
> net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0.
This bug is already fixed:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3988161+0+archive/2003/cvs-all/20030223.cvs-all
--
Maxim Konovalov, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can somebody please use "cvs update -D " to do a binary search and
identify which exact commit caused the problem ?
Hello,
I am getting the following result:
A Kernel check out with the following command works:
cvs -d /space/CVSROOT co -D "2003-02-20 00:00"-P src
the one
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I had to add two lines to my make.conf to get boot2 to compile:
UFS2_BOOT=UFS1_ONLY
UFS1_ONLY=yes
If you are using UFS2 you need to edit appropriately, of course.
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://j
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 03:54:30PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> > That's saying the acpi.ko module was not built and installed.
> >
> > When you install your new kernel, use the Makefile target, instead
> > of using "cp", or it won't install the modules it builds.
> >
> > If you did this, then
This problem started about Feb 19 and continues thru today's updates.
Everything seems to work great until I shut down the X server
at which time I get a fatal 'page fault while in kernel mode.'
I have two -CURRENT machines at the moment and only the one
with the nVidia driver (and kernel module)
> MODULES_WITH_WORLD causes modules to be installed during installworld.
> But when you later do installkernel, it renames /boot/kernel to
> /boot/kernel.old, so all your modules end up there. Don't use
> MODULES_WITH_WORLD, or use ``make reinstallkernel'' which is safe
> for MODULES_WITH_WORLD en
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 03:54:30PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> > > That's saying the acpi.ko module was not built and installed.
> > >
> > > When you install your new kernel, use the Makefile target, instead
> > > of using "cp", or it won't install the modules it build
walt wrote:
> This problem started about Feb 19 and continues thru today's updates.
>
> Everything seems to work great until I shut down the X server
> at which time I get a fatal 'page fault while in kernel mode.'
>
> I have two -CURRENT machines at the moment and only the one
> with the nVidia
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> > MODULES_WITH_WORLD causes modules to be installed during installworld.
> > But when you later do installkernel, it renames /boot/kernel to
> > /boot/kernel.old, so all your modules end up there. Don't use
> > MODULES_WITH_WORLD, or use ``make reinstallkernel'' which is
On Sunday 23 February 2003 11:10 am, Richard Arends wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, David Syphers wrote:
> > I added BOOT2_UFS=UFS2_ONLY to my make.conf, and my buildworld still dies
> > in boot2. I'm trying to upgrade from a Feb. 19 -current (because it's
> > crashing all the time, and I need to ena
Terry Lambert wrote:
walt wrote:
This problem started about Feb 19 and continues thru today's updates.
Everything seems to work great until I shut down the X server
at which time I get a fatal 'page fault while in kernel mode.'
I have two -CURRENT machines at the moment and only the one
with the
about four days ago,
> apparently.
>
> Anyone else seeing this?
Yes.
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1225336+0+archive/2003/cvs-all/20030223.cvs-all
--
Maxim Konovalov, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Hi,
does anybody know wether FreeBSD supports PCMCIA cards for wireless lan based
on 802.11g (54MBit/s) standard?
Sincerley
Gerald Mixa
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:24:48 -0700 (MST)
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "James E. Flemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : There are some non-if_* modules in there now that seem to
> : be only documented in /usr/src, exca is a good exam
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 06:51:19PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 04:53:07PM -0800, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> > I have tried running my test machine out of filesystem space
> > (repeatedly) and have not been able to get this panic. I will
> > keep running that test in the hopes
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 01:37:24PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Hmm. The machines that have panicked are likely to have been under
> > extreme disk load at the time they ran out of space (e.g. extracting
> > several dozen large tarballs simultaneously) [1]. I'll have to see if
> > I can trigg
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tom Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:24:48 -0700 (MST)
: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:
: > In message:
: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > "James E. Flemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : There are some n
Hello,
I've just noticed that recent -CURRENT kernels (from at least 2 days
to now, but I suspect it might be a little longer) do not find my
ATAPI CDROM drive. The kernel config file is the same as before,
kernel CFLAGS are also the same (and I've even tried building the
kernel without
auth 60ff6b89 unsubscribe freebsd-current [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 02:49:52PM -0600, David Syphers wrote:
> fails. (Am I correct in assuming a 5.0-R install defaults to UFS2?)
You are not correct. 5.0-R, and infact 5-CURRENT still default to ufs1.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the bo
David Syphers wrote:
> Okay, I've verified that the problem is due to rev. 1.39 of
> /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h. Peter Wemm pointed out that the problem is not the
> commit, but gcc's bad handling of 64-bit operations. Nonetheless, this commit
> does break world for a lot of people... is there some
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 07:27, Gerald Mixa wrote:
> does anybody know wether FreeBSD supports PCMCIA cards for wireless lan based
> on 802.11g (54MBit/s) standard?
Nope..
802.11g isn't a final standard yet either (note no WiFi logo on 11g
stuff)
Personally I'd wait a bit until the standard is fin
On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 10:22, Orion Hodson wrote:
> The VIA8233/8235 audio driver has undergone another revision in an attempt to
> provide support for the VIA8235. The code is in -CURRENT as of 5 minutes ago.
> Several people have reported quiet/inaudible sound on P4 boards with this
> southbr
Hello gang. Nothing big, but important...
Can someone tell me if the machdep.guessed_bootdev sysctl is helpful at
all? I think it's a waste, and it's pretty limited and only available
on the i386.
It currently guesses 'wd' instead of 'ad' for the dev. nodes, .e.g:
hiten:~/> sysctl mach
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> David Syphers wrote:
> > Okay, I've verified that the problem is due to rev. 1.39 of
> > /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h. Peter Wemm pointed out that the problem is not the
> > commit, but gcc's bad handling of 64-bit operations. Nonetheless, this commit
> > d
From: David Syphers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kirk McKusick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: BOOT2_UFS=UFS1_ONLY works for today's current
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:49:52 -0600
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 23 February 2003 11:10 am, Richard Arends w
Fred Souza wrote:
> I've just noticed that recent -CURRENT kernels (from at least 2 days
> to now, but I suspect it might be a little longer) do not find my
> ATAPI CDROM drive.
This happened to me today, but it turned out that the drive wasn't
recognized after a reboot if there was an audio CD
Hiten Pandya wrote:
> Hello gang. Nothing big, but important...
>
> Can someone tell me if the machdep.guessed_bootdev sysctl is helpful at
> all? I think it's a waste, and it's pretty limited and only available
> on the i386.
>
> It currently guesses 'wd' instead of 'ad' for the dev. nodes, .e
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> Can someone tell me if the machdep.guessed_bootdev sysctl is helpful at
> all? I think it's a waste, and it's pretty limited and only available
> on the i386.
It is not helpful. Someone removed the initialization of the kernel
variable bootdev for i386
Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Personally, I think the changes should be #ifdef'ed the current
> > version of GCC; when GCC rev's, hopefully its 64 bit operations
> > handling will have improved.
>
> This would wrong, since ufs2 depends on the changes to actually work
> for file systems larger than about
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hiten Pandya writes:
>
>--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>Hello gang. Nothing big, but important...
>
>Can someone tell me if the machdep.guessed_bootdev sysctl is helpful at
>all? I think it's a waste, a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:10:59AM +0100) wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hiten Pandya writes:
> >
> >--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> >Hello gang. Nothing big, but important...
> >
> >Can someone tell me
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> > > Personally, I think the changes should be #ifdef'ed the current
> > > version of GCC; when GCC rev's, hopefully its 64 bit operations
> > > handling will have improved.
> >
> > This would wrong, since ufs2 depends on the changes
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, I wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Hiten Pandya wrote:
>
> > Can someone tell me if the machdep.guessed_bootdev sysctl is helpful at
> > all? I think it's a waste, and it's pretty limited and only available
> > on the i386.
>
> It is not helpful. Someone removed the initializat
Before blaming me, i know it is not supported for 5.x or -current, but i
think some of us have that stuff already running on -current.
I've been in hospital for many weeks and now i updated my system (late
November) to the currents current. After adding the missing include, i
successfully compiled
60 matches
Mail list logo
