Hi,
just got the following panic with today's -current sources and
an oldish config file (one not having "options SOFTUPDATES"):
panic: softdep_slowdown called
Debugger("panic")
Stopped at Debugger+0x45: xchgl %ebx,0xc05fa740
db> trace
Debugger(c026141c) at Debugger+0x
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Luigi Rizzo writes:
>Hi,
>just got the following panic with today's -current sources and
>an oldish config file (one not having "options SOFTUPDATES"):
>panic(c026ecc1,c66e1b94,c01ff565,c1cda000,0) at panic+0x7c
>softdep_slowdown(c1cda000,0,0,,2) at
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 00:45, karl agee wrote:
> ok...its crashing here, now.I've deleted the /usr/src/gnu directory
> and re-cvsuped it, but it still_crashes:
>
>
Re-cvsup and try it again. I got that Thursday, but Friday it worked.
Well, the system locked at loading the fxp driver, but it
Andrew Kolchoogin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David,
>
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 12:39:55AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> > The rest of the GCC using world can use -O2 on their code. We are the
> > only ones that have so much trouble with it. It is probably due to our
> > bugs, not GCC's.
By the time 5.0 is released do you aim to complete all the planned
features at www.freebsd.org/smp? (like full kernel preemption) I know it's
a tentative list but still if there's a consensus about that let me know.
Will 5.0 stable be created after KSE milestone 4 commit?
I just wanted to know mo
On 2002-08-03 12:14 +, Alp ATICI wrote:
[snip]
>
> And what's the latest about the Nvidia drivers? It's mentioned that
> Nvidia has plans to produce the drivers for FreeBSD. I'd be happy to know
> what's going on in that issue too.
>
We know about as much as you do. Waiting for NVIDIA, on
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Alp ATICI wrote:
> And what's the latest about the Nvidia drivers? It's mentioned that
> Nvidia has plans to produce the drivers for FreeBSD. I'd be happy to
> know what's going on in that issue too.
"Any day now."
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | F
Hi Gordon,
This patch seems to make bootparamd work on my machine.
John
--
John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- /usr/src/etc/rc.d/bootparamsFri Jun 14 00:14:36 2002
+++ bootparams Sat Aug 3 10:24:44 2002
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@
. /etc/rc.subr
name="bootparamd"
-rcvar=$
"FreeBSD,BeOS,Linux"|"Cisco Network Academy"
BSD User = 050834 | Linux User = 280168
The Power to the Serve
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PRO
I got around the lack of IRQ on pcic1 by means of a trick involving
hw sets in loader.conf (thanks to the mobile contributors); now it
won't mount root.
I know what the problem is but not why; the loader brings the kernel in
fine, and probes work fine; I'd presume if the partition were too h
Le Saturday 03 August 2002 22:09, Matthew N. Dodd a écrit :
> On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Alp ATICI wrote:
> > And what's the latest about the Nvidia drivers? It's mentioned that
> > Nvidia has plans to produce the drivers for FreeBSD. I'd be happy to
> > know what's going on in that issue too.
>
> "Any d
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
> Le Saturday 03 August 2002 22:09, Matthew N. Dodd a écrit :
> > On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Alp ATICI wrote:
> > > And what's the latest about the Nvidia drivers? It's mentioned that
> > > Nvidia has plans to produce the drivers for FreeBSD. I'd be happy to
>
Hello.
I've encountered this panic with kernel from source as of 2002.07.30.00.00.00 .
I've seen this panic message in Julian's message in July
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
but he said in another mail that it was a pilot error. I've searched the list
archive and PR, but found none similar to this.
Th
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 05:28:07PM -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
>
> Sorry, this has been the status for months now.
>
ugh, sounds like the lip-service I was getting. "I'll look into that" :/
I'm starting to ponder the legality and challenge involved in reverse
engineering the card and build
Pete Carah wrote:
> I got around the lack of IRQ on pcic1 by means of a trick involving
> hw sets in loader.conf (thanks to the mobile contributors); now it
> won't mount root.
>
> I know what the problem is but not why; the loader brings the kernel in
> fine, and probes work fine; I'd presum
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Erik Greenwald wrote:
> ugh, sounds like the lip-service I was getting. "I'll look into that" :/
No, they're working on it, and actually have GL running in the lab.
> I'm starting to ponder the legality and challenge involved in reverse
> engineering the card and building a d
QUIT
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
17 matches
Mail list logo
