On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> >
> > An easy way to induce a panic w/a post KSE -current is to ^C gdb as it
> > starts on an SMP machine:
>
> A possibly related breakage is:
>
> type ^Z while doing "make buiildworld" (or something simil
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> Maybe just remove the foot-shooting that releases it?
>
> % Index: kern_sig.c
> % ===
> % RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/kern_sig.c,v
> % retrieving revision 1.170
> % retrieving revision 1
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:01:14PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> (csh built with GCC2, -O3)
> test3:/home/dillon> time ./x.csh
> 0.832u 0.848s 0:01.68 99.4% 881+645k 0+0io 0pf+0w
> test3:/home/dillon> time ./x.csh
> 0.926u 0.755s 0:01.68 99.4% 889+654k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>
hunter# ipfw add 50 divert natd all from any to any via fxp0
ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument
hunter# ipfw list
00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0
00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8
00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any
65000 allow ip from a
At 3:18 AM -0400 7/3/02, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>At 4:57 PM +0200 6/26/02, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>>c) ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server:
>>
>>Add the attached patch-gcc31, taken from Motoyuki Konno's post to
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the following Message-ID:
>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTE
At 4:00 AM -0400 7/3/02, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>I started up XDM, and that also worked. Not only that, but my
>machine didn't instantly reboot when XDM started, which had been
>happening to me for the last few days...
Bah humbug. I went to log into XDM, and the machine sat there
for awhile,
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Maybe just remove the foot-shooting that releases it?
Yes I'm rationalising it at the moment..
turns out that just holding it for all of tdsignal works well.
Also removing it from setrunnable() is ok as al
On 03-Jul-2002 Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>>
>> Erm, I thought I changd signotify() to require sched_lock and made the
>> second half of psignal() (the whole case statement) lock sched_lock.
>> Did you change that? (To Julian)
>
> psignal as a who
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mario Goebbels writes:
>Hi!
>
>I have some questions about it.
>
>The first one is, when I compiled GEOM into the kernel, will physical
>disks be controlled by it already? Or does it apply to md mounted
>devices yet?
all disks should be GEOM'ized.
>And the secon
"Georg-W. Koltermann" wrote:
>
> hunter# ipfw add 50 divert natd all from any to any via fxp0
> ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument
Add "option IPFIREWALL_FORWARD" into your kernel config.
-Maxim
> hunter# ipfw list
> 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0
Julian Elischer wrote:
> Should ALL threads be awakened, or is it enough if ONE thread awakens to
> deliver the thread.
>
> For right now it's mostly important that single threaded processs act
> as they used to. We can always change how multithreaded processes
> work.
POSIX makes no guarantees
aren't you suppost to be honeymooning from yesterday?
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 03-Jul-2002 Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Erm, I thought I changd signotify() to require sched_lock and made the
> >> second half of psignal() (the whole case statement) lock sched_loc
Operator error, sorry for the false alarm.
I had removed all of my IPFIREWALL options from my config in an attempt
to find the cause of instability. I'm surprised that ipfw(8) did
anything useful at all with that kernel.
--
Thanks a lot,
Georg.
Am Mi, 2002-07-03 um 10.48 schrieb Maxim Sobolev:
Expanding on my own mail:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> >
> > Well then it must be full of races then that were fixed since DP1.
> > *sigh* I wonder how many other things were lost and need to be
> > reimplemented.
> >
Almost anyth
On 03-Jul-2002 Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Expanding on my own mail:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Well then it must be full of races then that were fixed since DP1.
>> > *sigh* I wonder how many other things were los
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jul
ian Elischer writes:
>aren't you suppost to be honeymooning from yesterday?
I am, I'm not working, only doing things I do for fun :-)
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 10:59, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jul
> ian Elischer writes:
>
> >aren't you suppost to be honeymooning from yesterday?
>
> I am, I'm not working, only doing things I do for fun :-)
Isn't it a bit worrying when the two overlap? :)
--
Simon
Thus spake Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Personally, I prefer knowing my code should work before giving
> it to the compiler, rather than using the compiler to think
> about things I'm too lazy/incapable of thinking of on my own.
> Given that, I would always favor a trade for faster run tim
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 11:01 PM -0700 7/2/02, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > I get just about the same performance for GCC2 as I
> > do for GCC3 in the tests I've run so far. It makes
> > me wonder what the hell GCC3 is burning all that
> > cpu *on*.
>
> One
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mario Goebbels writes:
> >And the second is, when will it be officially activated? Seems to work
> >fine yet (toying around with it).
>
> Some bits are missing yet, for instance the ioctls to change
> disklabels etc.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mario Goebbels writes:
>> >And the second is, when will it be officially activated? Seems to work
>> >fine yet (toying around with it).
>>
>> Some bits are missing
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:55:18AM -0700, Shizuka Kudo wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I wonder if anyone experienced the same issue as mime. I have an ASUS CUSL2 running
>-current and
> starting about three days ago, it panic when acpi is autoloaded. If I unset
>acpi_load at the boot
> prompt, the mach
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> Some bits are missing yet, for instance the ioctls to change
> >> disklabels etc. when they're done and it works also with sysinstall
> >> it'll
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>> >On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> >> Some bits are missing yet, for instance the ioctls to change
>> >> disklabels etc. when
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade installed XFree86-4-Server package, but found that
a new gcc can't compile it. Following is relevant error output:
rm -f texutil.o
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../../../exports/lib cc -c -pipe -O -mpreferred-stack-boundar
y=2 -march=pentium-mmx -ansi -pedantic -Dasm=__asm -Wall
Andrzej Kwiatkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've upgrade my FreeBSD 5.0 two days ago.
> Yesterday when i have compile XMMS from ports,
Threads were broken. Update and try again.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECT
On a 27-June-2002 23:02:00 UTC system (just before ipfw2 went in,
pre-KSE3), dump will not complete dumping more than 5GB. At that point
it stops responding properly to ^T, which should give "DUMP: 47.52% done,
finished in 1:19". At the 5GB mark, ^T gives:
load: 0.00 cmd: dump 3981 [physst
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 05:26:50PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to upgrade installed XFree86-4-Server package, but found that
> a new gcc can't compile it. Following is relevant error output:
...
> In file included from translate.c:779:
> ../../../../extras/Mesa/src/trans_tm
At 5:26 PM +0300 7/3/02, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am trying to upgrade installed XFree86-4-Server package,
>but found that a new gcc can't compile it. Following is
>relevant error output:
[...skipped...]
>Please investigate & fix.
Some information is in the email-thread under the subje
After building today's -CURRENT successfully (CVSup started at 0347 hrs.
Pacific (7 hrs. west of GMT/UTC at this time of year) from cvsup14, with
the addition of Ruslan's updates to the src/share/mk/bsd.*.mk files),
I thought it might be of use to just let this SMP (2x866 PIII) box sit
in a "make
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
zhang jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> When I using netperf to test Intel Pro/1000 performance,
> I got strange netstat output:
>
> #./netperf -H 10.0.0.2
> TCP STREAM TEST to 10.0.0.2
>
> on 10.0.0.2, I start netstat -w 1 , but got strange output:
>
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:45:19AM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> which has been seeing sporadic messages over the past week
> or two. Sheldon has a few informative messages which include
> some patches to test. (although I don't think the patches
> are a complete fix for the problems we're s
Sick sick sick :-)
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jul
> ian Elischer writes:
>
> >aren't you suppost to be honeymooning from yesterday?
>
> I am, I'm not working, only doing things I do for fun :-)
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> The argument could be made that you shouldn't be checking in stuff
> until you know how it works, etc., or that you could commit in smaller
> pieces (say, get multiple threads per process for kernel processes
> working in the scheduler and just ignor
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 07:11:16PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On Friday 21 June 2002 06:02 pm, David O'Brien wrote:
> = On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 05:46:17PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>
> = > Why can't we have some way to explicitly list what is and what is not
> = > needed?
> =
> = Feel fr
On 03-Jul-2002 Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>>
>> The argument could be made that you shouldn't be checking in stuff
>> until you know how it works, etc., or that you could commit in smaller
>> pieces (say, get multiple threads per process for kernel
congratulations.. I think that you win the Matt Dillon "got both
processors to enter the ddb at the same time" award..
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, David Wolfskill wrote:
> login: panic: vm_page_free: invalid wire count (360), pindex: 0x1
> cpuid = 0; lapic.id =
> Debugger("panic")
> uernteilm e
David O'Brien wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 05:26:50PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to upgrade installed XFree86-4-Server package, but found that
> > a new gcc can't compile it. Following is relevant error output:
> ...
> > In file included from translate.c:779:
>
On 03-Jul-2002 Julian Elischer wrote:
> congratulations.. I think that you win the Matt Dillon "got both
> processors to enter the ddb at the same time" award..
>
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, David Wolfskill wrote:
>
>> login: panic: vm_page_free: invalid wire count (360), pindex: 0x1
>> cpuid = 0; la
At 9:27 AM -0700 7/3/02, David O'Brien wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 03, 2002, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > Sheldon has a few informative messages which include
> > some patches to test. (although I don't think the patches
>> are a complete fix for the problems we're seeing -- see my
>> replies to that
Julian Elischer wrote:
> TAILQ_FOREACH_REMOVABLE or TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE
> (I prefer the first) are my suggestions for the name.)
TAILQ_FOREACH_MODIFY ?
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
At 10:38 AM -0700 7/3/02, Terry Lambert wrote:
>Julian Elischer wrote:
>> TAILQ_FOREACH_REMOVABLE or TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE
>> (I prefer the first) are my suggestions for the name.)
>
>TAILQ_FOREACH_MODIFY ?
I sense great material for a bikeshed... :-)
For mine, how about: TAILQ_FOREACH_VOLATI
On (2002/07/03 13:29), Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> With his patches I was able to compile and install imake. I was
> able to compile XFree86-4-libraries, but the 'make install' of it
> fails for me after getting most of the way through. I suspect
> this is a build problem, not a cc problem.
Yes
At 8:07 PM +0200 7/3/02, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>Yes, remember that you're building the MATROX stuff, which I'm not.
Yes, I should have mentioned that. Is Maxim compiling the matrox
drivers? Perhaps I should retry without those.
>Also, remember that my patches were for the base system's toolchai
Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mario Goebbels writes:
> > >And the second is, when will it be officially activated? Seems to work
> > >fine yet (toying around with it).
> >
> > Some bits are missing yet, for instance the ioctls
I cvsup'd and built world+kernel a few hours ago and was happy to see
KDE working again, but I got a spontaneous reboot while trying to track
down a segfault in a mozilla build component. I "boot -v"'ed and as
soon as the login prompt came up I hit a panic. I'm guessing the
backgorund fsck h
:I cvsup'd and built world+kernel a few hours ago and was happy to see
:KDE working again, but I got a spontaneous reboot while trying to track
:down a segfault in a mozilla build component. I "boot -v"'ed and as
:soon as the login prompt came up I hit a panic. I'm guessing the
:backgorund f
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:15:13PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> Fwiw, I am also using the system toolchain (as cvsup'ed late last
> night), and not the port.
I can build x11/XFree86-4 with the following patches, which I harvested
from various email's since the gcc 3.1 import. Which one
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can rlogin to a -CURRENT box as root. However `rsh box id' comes back
> with:
>
> Jul 3 00:11:33 box rshd[4916]: root@dragon as rootk: permission denied
> (authentication error). cmd='id'
man pam_rhosts should explain that.
--
cheers, J
I'm also suddenly having a panics - every 5 minutes actually, since my
latest cvsup a few hours ago. They seem to be related to some ufs
and ffs calls..
I'm not able to read my core dumps for some reason (gdb says "kernel
symbol 'cpuhead' not found.") and I don't have the time to scratch a
backt
Unfortunatly thre is a codepath in the KSE system that has not
been tested, due to a bug in the UVM system. Jeff fixed the UVM
problem for me ysesterday but that means that the following
stack trace (representing the code path in question) is now
used and teh resulting panic happens...
Is ther
>
> You were possibly on the right track but we got the answer already :-)
> there was a debug statement left in queue.h
>
> that was breaking some of the queues in libc_r
>
> possibly where the thread was taken off the run queue.
> Now the very important thing is that you keep looking
> and ha
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 08:56:02PM +0200, Jeremy Lea wrote:
> I can build x11/XFree86-4 with the following patches, which I harvested
> from various email's since the gcc 3.1 import. Which ones are really
> needed, and why the X11 libraries are built four times during the build
> of the meta port
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Erik Greenwald wrote:
>
> Looks like I'm out of this one, I got up this morning, cvsup'd and built
> world just to make sure it was fresh, then I quit getting the crashes. I
> d'no if the issue was fixed by something someone else did or what...
>
It was solved, but thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 01:10:08PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> Some one needs to do thru these and really deal with them.
I didn't say they were right, just that they worked ;-)
> * The patch to use -O0 (or remove -O) is wrong, and a test case should be
> submitted to the GCC people.
I
Jeremy Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. What the patches actually do...
> 2. If we can use one shared ${WRKSRC}, since the ports build multiple
>copies of all of the libraries, and they use the wrong (unpatched)
>versions of the config files in some cases.
While you're at it:
Index:
Here's a me too.. running on an ASUS A7V266-E
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> fault virtual address = 0x16
> fault code = supervisor read, page not present
> instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc04f9aca
> stack pointer = 0x10:0xc054ea14
> frame pointer
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:59:47AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jul
> ian Elischer writes:
>
> >aren't you suppost to be honeymooning from yesterday?
>
> I am, I'm not working, only doing things I do for fun :-)
Like reading Linux source code?
8-)
--
|
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Neal Fachan wrote:
> We've got local changes (which I've attached) where the name is
> *_FOREACH_REMOVE. We didn't add reverse removable iterators. Also, the
> temp variable is the second argument. I can't think of a way of doing it
> without having the externally declare th
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 08:08:28PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > In file included from translate.c:779:
> > > ../../../../extras/Mesa/src/trans_tmp.h: In function `trans_1_GLdouble_1ub_elt':
> > >
> > > ../../../../extras/Mesa/src/trans_tmp.h:124: could not find a spill register
> > > (insn 96
On Wednesday, July 3, 2002, at 04:13 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Erik Greenwald wrote:
>
>>
>> Looks like I'm out of this one, I got up this morning, cvsup'd and
>> built
>> world just to make sure it was fresh, then I quit getting the
>> crashes. I
>> d'no if the issu
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Erik Greenwald wrote:
> >
>
> > Looks like I'm out of this one, I got up this morning, cvsup'd and built
>
I agree that it's unfortunately named. The idea was that it's safe to
remove from within the iterator, not that the iterator is doing the
removing...
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:04:53PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Neal Fachan wrote:
>
> > We've got local changes (whi
We've got local changes (which I've attached) where the name is
*_FOREACH_REMOVE. We didn't add reverse removable iterators. Also, the
temp variable is the second argument. I can't think of a way of doing it
without having the externally declare the temporary variable.
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 04:
hey don't give up yet..
there's still a couple of crashing bugs hiding in there
you could have your chance yet..
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, W Gerald Hicks wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, July 3, 2002, at 04:13 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Erik Greenwald wrote:
> >
> >>
>
Julian,
You may have fixed over the last few, but I haven't
had a chance to cvsup new sources.
--
Steve
http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/
panic: vm_page_free: freeing wired page
panic: from debugger
Uptime: 39m56s
Dumping 128 MB
16 32 48 64 80 96 112
---
#0 0xc019c5cb in doadump (
while we are getting rid of Giant, current race condition between softclock()
and callout_stop() is unacceptable. the race causes two many places in source
code would be modified to fit this new behaviour, besides this, everywhere
callout_stop() is used need to hold sched_lock and do a mi_switc
to keep the sparc 64 pmap up with the others..
I had a look at a couple of thread related points.
Here's a possible diff (1 bug found I think)
any sparc64 people care to comment?
(cat-n-pasted patch)
The last addition is I think needed to not leak KV space.
The first changes are because the co
Hi,
I know everyone says "they all work" but i'd like some recommendations on
MP machines for -CURRENT work. I'll be ordering one this week.
Thanks,
George
--
George V. Neville-Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Neville-Neil Consulting
* George V. Neville-Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020703 19:43] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know everyone says "they all work" but i'd like some recommendations on
> MP machines for -CURRENT work. I'll be ordering one this week.
I got a dual AMD 1900 from monarchcomputer.com, it was pretty decently
pr
Not fixed yet, just a intermediate report...
> > acpi0: on motherboard
> >
> >
> > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> > fault virtual address = 0x16
> > fault code = supervisor read, page not present
> > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc04f9aca
> > stack pointer
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 07:43:22PM -0700, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
> I know everyone says "they all work" but i'd like some recommendations on
> MP machines for -CURRENT work. I'll be ordering one this week.
There is but _1_ dual system to get -- Tyan Thunder K7 (code name Guinness).
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 07:43:22PM -0700, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
> > I know everyone says "they all work" but i'd like some recommendations on
> > MP machines for -CURRENT work. I'll be ordering one this week.
>
> There is but _1_ dual system
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:50:00PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> (2) a
> fixed onboard usb port. The K7 had a broken on-board usb (the AMD
> chipset had a PCI contention bug for the usb port, so the tin back panel
> of the board blocked out the usb, and the K7 came with a PCI usb card,
> which ate
Sources checked out today, 3AM EST.
makeinfo --no-validate -I
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/doc/../../../../contrib/binutils/gas/doc
-I /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/doc/../../../../contrib/binutils/ld -I
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/doc/../../../../contrib/binutils/bfd/doc
-I
/usr/src/gnu/usr.b
Well it's all fun and games her at KSE central..
We have a set of cascading hidden bugs..
bug 1 hides bug 2 hides bug 3
the current state of play:
the system works well for a while however there is a leak in
the system that gradually runs the system out memory.
the wired memory count grows wit
Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 07:43:22PM -0700, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
> > > I know everyone says "they all work" but i'd like some recommendations
on
> > > MP machines for -CURRENT work. I'll be ordering one this week.
78 matches
Mail list logo
