Re: The -current state of mozilla affairs

2002-06-20 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 02:21, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > I supped a -CURRENT system 3 days ago and am still having the problem > > > described here, but the gcc that's in the base system is 3.1 at this > > > point. I'm installing gcc32 now and will try building this again > > > using a newer ver

Re: new zero copy sockets snapshot

2002-06-20 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Bosko Milekic writes: > > Years ago, I used Wollman's MCLBYTES > PAGE_SIZE support (introduced > > in rev 1.20 of uipc_mbuf.c) and it seemed to work OK then. But having > > 16K clusters is a huge waste of space. ;). > > Since then, the mbuf allocator in -CURRENT has totally changed. It

Re: konqueror 3.0.1 eats all CPU

2002-06-20 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Michael Nottebrock: > At least on -CURRENT, this stems from QT being compiled with the > system-gcc3, which breaks the gif-loader of QT. Here is a patch for the I've seen that mentionned a few times but what did we changed in gcc31 in the system that makes it generate bad code ? --

Re: konqueror 3.0.1 eats all CPU

2002-06-20 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Michael Nottebrock: > >>At least on -CURRENT, this stems from QT being compiled with the >>system-gcc3, which breaks the gif-loader of QT. Here is a patch for the > > > I've seen that mentionned a few times but what did we changed in gcc31 in the > system

Re: error in ncurses in 'make buildworld'

2002-06-20 Thread David O'Brien
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:] On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 01:26:49PM +0400, Igor Roboul wrote: > > And continues to 'lib_gen.c:824: `a0' undeclared'. > rm -f /usr/bin/awk > ln /usr/bin/gawk /usr/bin/awk > > Then rebuild. > > I have posted info about a

Re: The -current state of mozilla affairs

2002-06-20 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 11:21:35PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote: > -#if defined(__FreeBSD_cc_version) && \ > + #if defined(__FreeBSD_cc_version) && (__FreeBSD_cc_version < 53) && \ > (__FreeBSD_cc_version < 42 || __FreeBSD_cc_version > 43) > #define CFRONT_STYLE_THIS_ADJUST Plea

Re: vm related kernel panics

2002-06-20 Thread Jeff Roberson
> I got 2 panics from -current sources of today. > The back traces are: > > panic 1: > vm_page_insert > vm_page_alloc > vm_page_grab > pmap_new_proc > vm_forkproc > fork1 > fork > syscall > syscal > > panic 2: > panic > mtx_init > fork1 > fork > syscal > syscall > >

Re: new zero copy sockets snapshot

2002-06-20 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 12:25:58PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: [...] > > > Do you think it would be feasable to glue in a new jumbo (10K?) > > > allocator on top of the existing mbuf and mcl allocators using the > > > existing mechanisms and the existing MCLBYTES > PAGE_SIZE support > > > (

Re: new zero copy sockets snapshot

2002-06-20 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Bosko Milekic writes: > > > > I'm a bit worried about other devices.. Tradidtionally, mbufs have > > never crossed page boundaries so most drivers never bother to check > > for a transmit mbuf crossing a page boundary. Using physically > > discontigous mbufs could lead to a lot of subtle d

Re: The -current state of mozilla affairs

2002-06-20 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 13:25, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 11:21:35PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > -#if defined(__FreeBSD_cc_version) && \ > > + #if defined(__FreeBSD_cc_version) && (__FreeBSD_cc_version < 53) && \ > > (__FreeBSD_cc_version < 42 || __FreeBSD_cc_v

[OT] ACPI based support for suspend to disk?

2002-06-20 Thread Fischer, Oliver
Hello, is there a upcomming feature similar to W2K's ability to suspend the current state of the machine to a disk and to restore it from there? Thanks, Oliver To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

FireWire for DV anyone?

2002-06-20 Thread Seth Hettich
I see that this may work for linux, but are any -current people using this "for real" (not just toy applications)? I was just given a Sony DV camera, and I thought I should at least make an attempt to hook it up to the computer. -Seth To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubsc

Re: [OT] ACPI based support for suspend to disk?

2002-06-20 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 08:37:35PM +0200, Fischer, Oliver wrote: > Hello, > > is there a upcomming feature similar to W2K's ability to > suspend the current state of the machine to a disk and to > restore it from there? I believe it already exists, it just depends on your bios as to whether you

Re: [OT] ACPI based support for suspend to disk?

2002-06-20 Thread Fischer, Oliver
You are right. My PC supports this via BIOS too. The disadvantage is, that the bios handle it. I like W2K's feature to do it ACPI based (?). This gives my the freedom to suspend my W2K to disk and to reboot with FBSD. Later I reboot again and choose W2K and it restores it previous state. If the bi

Re: [OT] ACPI based support for suspend to disk?

2002-06-20 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Fischer, Oliver wrote: > You are right. My PC supports this via BIOS too. The > disadvantage is, that the bios handle it. I like W2K's > feature to do it ACPI based (?). This gives my the freedom > to suspend my W2K to disk and to reboot with FBSD. Later I > reboot again and choose W2K and it rest

RE: [OT] ACPI based support for suspend to disk?

2002-06-20 Thread Grover, Andrew
> From: Michael Nottebrock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > You are right. My PC supports this via BIOS too. The > > disadvantage is, that the bios handle it. I like W2K's > > feature to do it ACPI based (?). This gives my the freedom > > to suspend my W2K to disk and to reboot with FBSD. Later I >

Re: [OT] ACPI based support for suspend to disk?

2002-06-20 Thread Takanori Watanabe
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Nottebrock wrote: >Fischer, Oliver wrote: >> You are right. My PC supports this via BIOS too. The >> disadvantage is, that the bios handle it. I like W2K's >> feature to do it ACPI based (?). This gives my the freedom >> to suspend my W2K to disk and to rebo

-CURRENT on Alpha

2002-06-20 Thread Wilkinson,Alex
Howdy Crew, I'm been having issues building -CURRENT on my Alpha pws 500au lately, in particular installworld. Anyway, I blew everything away (bec my world and kernel weren't in sync) and installed a SNAPSHOT from: ftp.jp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/alpha/5.0-20020330-SNAP/. This was the l

Re: new zero copy sockets snapshot

2002-06-20 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:45:11 -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:24:05AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Bosko Milekic writes: > > > > By the way, my other two comments have been deleted, but reading the > > > page that Ken maintains I noticed that Alfred already po

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: -CURRENT on Alpha

2002-06-20 Thread Makoto Matsushita
Alex.Wilkinson> Is it because no one has got a working world/kernel Alex.Wilkinson> for -CURRENT since March 2002 that a newer SNAPSHOT Alex.Wilkinson> has not been made ? I don't know it works or not (sorry), latest 5-current FreeBSD/alpha is available at ftp://snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org/pub/F

libpcap vs. up-to-date Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-20 Thread Bill Fenner
Ok, so I broke world. What I don't get is how -- why doesn't the build use the up to date includes? Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: libpcap vs. up-to-date Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-20 Thread Bill Fenner
And the answer is... it only uses the includes if you commit them to the FreeBSD repository instead of your local repository. Pointy hat to: fenner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

updated zero copy sockets snapshot available

2002-06-20 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
I've released a new zero copy sockets snapshot, based on -current from June 20th, 2002. http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ken/zero_copy This fixes the following issues: - Use SLIST_FIRST() macros to access the first entry in a SLIST in uipc_jumbo.c. I didn't fix all of these when Alfred pointed

Re: The -current state of mozilla affairs

2002-06-20 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 02:21, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > I supped a -CURRENT system 3 days ago and am still having the problem > > > described here, but the gcc that's in the base system is 3.1 at this > > > point. I'm installing gcc32 now and will try building this again > > > using a newer ver

Re: High interrupt usage in system (ohci and/or pcm?)

2002-06-20 Thread Anthony Jenkins
Compiled the USB out of the kernel and have *much* better responsiveness. I have a 4-port PCI USB OHCI controller card installed. With both the USB and pcm modules unloaded the irq10 handler seems to fall to 0% usage, but if I load snd_emu10k1.ko it pops right back up to 60% in top(1), regar

Re: error in ncurses in 'make buildworld'

2002-06-20 Thread Igor Roboul
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 10:16:11AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > I have posted info about awk (which is nawk) incorrectly printing > > numbers between 10 and 15. It adds ascii '0' to value. > > This is *NOT* a fix. nawk builds world just fine on my systems. > Of course this leads one to wond