Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you want final commit approval/objections, you really need to either
> include or go to developers@ instead since they're the ones dealing with
> actual commit process.
s/developers/arch/
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If you want final commit approval/objections, you really need to either
> > include or go to developers@ instead since they're the ones dealing with
> > actual commit process.
>
> s/developers/arch/
I wasn't clear with this
Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But he said he was asking for "permission" to commit it ("Seeking OK to
> commit KSE MIII-again"), so he should be talking with other committers.
I guess I just don't see why he needs our permission, as long as he's
given us a chance to comment on the tech
Bosko Milekic wrote:
> Then *you* can set *your* timer to hang to infinity. *I* have
> provided *the* ability to do *that*:
>
> tesla# sysctl -A | grep mbuf_wait
> kern.ipc.mbuf_wait: 32
> tesla# sysctl -w kern.ipc.mbuf_wait=0
>
> (Now the mbuf code will behave in such a way that it
Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Revision 1.51 of su.c fixes the bug.
> No it doesn't.
You're right, it doesn't work and I don't have time to go groveling
through the kernel to figure out why. Please back out 1.51 and commit
your own patch instead.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav -
A GENERIC kernel on current fails to compile missing softintr.
#
beast:/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC # make -DNO_MODULES -DNO_WERROR
cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winlin
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:14:33PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:20:57AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > ok, but does anyone other than john (who has commented) have any comments
> > about the logic and work in the change?
> >
> > I'm working on his comments but commen
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 02:02:27AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
[...]
> Bottom line?
>
> I'd like to see one set of uniform semantics.
>
> It really disturbs me that the behaviour of a common flag changes
> for some code, because of a sysctl, but doesn't change for all code
> using the flag.
>
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I'm running windows XP and vmware 3.1.1 with a guest os of FreeBSD
4.5 which I'm going to upgrade to -current. I couldn't find too much
info on this thread. Does anyone know if vmware3 is affected by this
problem when using a windows host os?
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Rain
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 10:54:54AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> I'm running windows XP and vmware 3.1.1 with a guest os of FreeBSD
> 4.5 which I'm going to upgrade to -current. I couldn't find too much
> info on this thread. Does anyone know if vmware3 is affected by this
> problem w
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:30:43AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> alfred 2002/05/30 00:30:43 PDT
>
> Modified files:
> sys/dev/ct ct_machdep.h
> sys/dev/ncv ncr53c500var.h
> sys/dev/stg tmc18c30var.h
> Log:
> Check for defined(__i386__) inst
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:34:10AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020531 09:09] wrote:
> > >
> > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC.
> > > #
> > >
> > > John
> >
> > Alfred,
> >
> > Your changes above broke building t
* Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020531 09:09] wrote:
> >
> > Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC.
> > #
> >
> > John
>
> Alfred,
>
> Your changes above broke building the GENERIC kernel. __i386__ is always
> defined (whether -ansi or not), and this now
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:14:33PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
>
> There are problems with the patchset:
fixed
This is code that translates the new states to old states for single
threaded processes so that 'ps' and friends can continue
to report a s
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Alfred,
> >
> > Your changes above broke building the GENERIC kernel. __i386__ is always
> > defined (whether -ansi or not), and this now causes SOFT_INTR_REQUIRED()
> > macro to use non-existing softintr(). (Well,
Apparently, On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 06:56:30PM -0700,
Julian Elischer said words to the effect of;
> > > + /* Note: use of M_WAITOK means it won't fail. */
> > > + newkse->ke_pcb =
> > > + &(((struct md_store *)(newkse->ke_mdstorage))->mds_pcb);
> > > + newkse->ke_frame =
> > > +
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 02:10:32AM +0900, Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Alfred,
> > >
> > > Your changes above broke building the GENERIC kernel. __i386__ is always
> > > defined (whether -ansi or not), and thi
You need to apply the patch that was posted sometime ago to -Current
to run it successfully as a Guest OS under VMWare 3.x...
Glenn G.
On Fri, 31 May 2002 10:54:54 -0500, "David W. Chapman Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm running windows XP and vmware 3.1.1 with a guest os of FreeBSD
>
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But he said he was asking for "permission" to commit it ("Seeking OK to
> > commit KSE MIII-again"), so he should be talking with other committers.
>
> I guess I just don't see why he needs our permission, as long as he's
> g
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:09:29PM +, Glenn Gombert wrote:
> You need to apply the patch that was posted sometime ago to -Current
> to run it successfully as a Guest OS under VMWare 3.x...
I tried searching the archives and couldn't find anything with VMware
and a patch, just some th
Hello!
Do you sell on Ebay? If so, you could be making up to $100,000
per month? This is no hype and no scam. Recieving over 1.5 billion
page views per month, Ebay is the ULTIMATE venue for selling
virtually anything and making huge profits with almost no effort.
But you have to know what to
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
[aweful stuff]
(always did dislike sparc)
jake..
can you show me the sequecne of operations performed on the stack
in a syscall before and after the jump to kernel space?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-c
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 02:10:32AM +0900, Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
> > These drivers are shared with NetBSD/pc98. Please don't make many
> > FreeBSD local changes. I will ask the original author about how to
> > resolve this problem. Please wait a few days.
> >
> It would
Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
>
> [aweful stuff]
> (always did dislike sparc)
>
> jake..
> can you show me the sequecne of operations performed on the stack
> in a syscall before and after the jump to kernel space?
It's not that awful. Read the paper "SP
Bosko Milekic wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:09:29PM +, Glenn Gombert wrote:
> > You need to apply the patch that was posted sometime ago to -Current
> > to run it successfully as a Guest OS under VMWare 3.x...
>
> I tried searching the archives and couldn't find anything with VMwa
Here is the patch from a previous posting that fixes the problem of
running FreeBSD -Current as a Guest OS under VMWare Workstation 3.0:
Someone mentioned on a list somewhere that vmware takes forever to
emulate the cmp
HAH! This patch was posted by iedowse in response to one of MY POSTS and
it does EXACTLY what I described in my previous Email, point (2).
PLZ DO NOT BRING MY HOPES UP BY STATING THAT THERE IS ANOTHER PATCH
WHICH DOES SOMETHING DIFFERENT WHEN IT FACT IT DOES WHAT I ALREADY KNOW
I SHOULD DO K PLZ
Morning all ...
After getting nowhere with the Surecom EP-428X that I picked up, I
went out today and grabbed one of the Linksys EC2T, figuring it's on the
list of supported devices I found, and I think I'm s close ...
First, I'm running a VAIO PCG-Z505S ... I've upgraded to
I have a fix for this, btw.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alfred Perlstein writes:
: I'm really fine with either. Let's wait till tomorrow for anyone to
: speak up, if no one does please feel free to commit whichever one you
: feel more comfortable with.
Aarrgh. I just committed my workaround, which basically adds && 0 t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ruslan Ermilov writes:
: It would be a good idea to move them under sys/contrib/ then.
I'm not so sure about that. I think they are fine where they are.
There are many drivers in the tree that are synced between platforms.
Also, right now other than acpi, the only
* Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020531 16:39] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alfred Perlstein writes:
> : I'm really fine with either. Let's wait till tomorrow for anyone to
> : speak up, if no one does please feel free to commit whichever one you
> : feel more comfortable with.
>
>
From: Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 17:39:55 -0600
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alfred Perlstein writes:
> : I'm really fine with either. Let's wait till tomorrow for anyone to
> : speak up, if no one does please feel free to commit whichever one you
> : feel more com
Apparently, On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:45:50PM -0700,
Julian Elischer said words to the effect of;
>
>
> On Fri, 31 May 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
>
> [aweful stuff]
> (always did dislike sparc)
Whatever. It's the most fun architecture I've found to program for.
>
> jake..
> can
interesting but not exactly brief.. :-)
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
>
> The system call stubs in libc are leaf functions; basically just a
> trap instruction followed by a return. They do not touch the stack
> at all, or change the stack pointer. One of the first few instruct
Apparently, On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 05:49:59PM -0700,
Julian Elischer said words to the effect of;
> interesting but not exactly brief.. :-)
>
>
> On Fri, 31 May 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
>
> >
> > The system call stubs in libc are leaf functions; basically just a
> > trap instruct
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> Apparently, On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 05:49:59PM -0700,
> Julian Elischer said words to the effect of;
>
> > interesting but not exactly brief.. :-)
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 31 May 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > The system call stu
Here is a patch to enable sysinstall to set 'sendmail_enable' value to
'YES', 'NO', and 'NONE'. Current sysinstall can't set this value to
'NONE'; users who do *not* want to use sendmail can't stop sendmail
via sysinstall.
Following patch creates submenu to change the sendmail_enable value.
How
If memory serves me right, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
> Following patch creates submenu to change the sendmail_enable value.
> However, I don't know who want to set this variable to 'NO'. If
> selecting 'YES' and 'NONE' is enough, I'll try to make another patch.
>
> Any comments? I want to push
bmah> Comments on the text only (i.e. I haven't tested the new menus)...
Thank you.
I've (of course) tested; making floppies and do a test that sysinstall
saves sendmail_enable line to /etc/rc.conf.
-- -
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita
Index: menus.c
==
cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wno-format -ansi
-nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/
src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/dev -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica
-I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
43 matches
Mail list logo
