On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:09:10PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 07:20:46AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> : > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:06:54PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> : > >
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Nope, what David was _actually_ trying to say is to hold off with WARNS
> fixes until GCC 3.1 becomes our compiler, because otherwise this is an
> almost 100% duplicate of efforts, as GCC 3.1 is so WARNS-different from
> GCC 2.95.3. And of course David should add NO_WERROR
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
...
> > Its the loader after showing:
> > ...
> > loader Revision...
> > (root@nihil, ...)
> > ...
> > And then a few rotating -\|/ (serching or loading loader.conf, kernel, ?)
> > Then silence.
>
> Hmm. Is your loader completely up to date? Does it have a
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
...
> > ...
> > loader Revision...
> > (root@nihil, ...)
> > ...
> > And then a few rotating -\|/ (serching or loading loader.conf, kernel, ?)
> > Then silence.
>
> Hmm. Is your loader completely up to date? Does it have a BIOS CD device cd0
> in the outpu
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00C4_03E14D8D.A0707E67"
> > I checked and compiled the recent -CURRENT tree,
> > buildworld and buildkernel goes all fine.
> >
> > When booting it seems to crash on initialization
> of my
> > Promise controller and get "bad ivar request (4)".
> I
> > stripped all possible drivers out of the
> kernelconfig,
> > except fo
Serwoas!
%s wrote on %.3s, %lld Sep 1993
> > Could it be due to the DDB, INVARIANTS & WITNESS options in the
> > kernel? If it is that's fine with me, I'm just wondering where
> > that magnitude of a slowdown would be coming from.
> WITNESS can really hurt. Quite possibly I should turn it off
John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Let me hijack this a little. How many of you WARNS= adding people
> consider different compile/code paths than the one your machine
> exercise? For instance the one "make release" will exercise? The
> WARNS=1 in libexec/Makefile.inc breaks "make release" beca
> John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Let me hijack this a little. How many of you WARNS= adding people
> > consider different compile/code paths than the one your machine
> > exercise? For instance the one "make release" will exercise? The
> > WARNS=1 in libexec/Makefile.inc breaks "make rel
:The following files under sys/ still use MFREE():
:
:alpha/tc/am7990.c
:netatm/port.h
:security/lomac/kernel_socket.c
:
:Please fix.
:
:
:Cheers,
:--
:Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA,
Please review the following patch. Note that the KB_ macros in
netatm could be further rewri
On 6 Feb, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> Anything else I should check? I realize there's about a million
> differences between the two branches, and there might also be
> something about my machine's setup which is a major culprit here.
> I'm just looking for a basic idea of what other people have
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Nope, what David was _actually_ trying to say is to hold off with WARNS
> > fixes until GCC 3.1 becomes our compiler, because otherwise this is an
> > almost 100% duplicate of efforts, as GCC 3.1 is so WARNS-different from
> >
I recently installed -current to ThinkPad X22. Though it seems that
X22's PC-Card slots work fine with -stable, in -current when probing
PCICs I got following message,
pcic0: mem 0x5000-0x5fff irq 11 at device
3.0 on pci2
pcib2: device pcic0 requested unsupported memory range 0x5000
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
>
>I recently installed -current to ThinkPad X22. Though it seems that
>X22's PC-Card slots work fine with -stable, in -current when probing
>PCICs I got following message,
>
>pcic0: mem 0x5000-0x5fff irq 11 at
>device 3.0 on pci2
>
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:02:34AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 06-Feb-02 Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > Could it be due to the DDB, INVARIANTS & WITNESS options in the
> > kernel? If it is that's fine with me, I'm just wondering where
> > that magnitude of a slowdown would be coming from.
>
Are the following lock order reversals something that I should mention
when I encounter them, in general?
On the other hand, this is from an older -current, built 25.Jan, before
which I don't see these messages, while after installworld/reboot, I
see them, except I haven't normally booted into -c
On 6 Feb, Mark Murray wrote:
> [...] a project as important as GCC3 [...]
BTW, how about, may be, if the stars are right, bringing in the Java
support too? gcj is now one of the compilers, that come with the GCC
package...
And it is promising -- it can compile Java into byte code or b
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:02:34AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> WITNESS can really hurt. Quite possibly I should turn it off in
> GENERIC now (I wouldn't mind if someone else did that.)
I think it should stay. Especially as we are not getting much usage in
-CURRENT. If we turn it off by defaul
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 09:40:50AM -0500, Steve Ames wrote:
> Is 'AJ' still set in the malloc options? I seem to recall setting
> /etc/malloc.conf once in CURRENT for performance reasons.
Yes it still is. That is the other thing Garance needs to decide if he
wants on or off.
To Unsubscribe: s
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:10:05AM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> On current On stable
> -- --
> real7m 43.392s 4m 53.100sin /usr/src for current
> user0m 11.692s 0m 4.203s
> sys 3m 4.601s 0m 2.248s
>
> real6m 40.322
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:21:07AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> Well, I think that's true: no one is saying you can't fix the warnings you
> find by turning up the warning level.
Well... it would be nice if people would do CORRECT fixes. From
some things DES was saying, people are making some r
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:19:19AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> BTW, how about, may be, if the stars are right, bringing in the Java
> support too? gcj is now one of the compilers, that come with the GCC
> package...
Uh, NO! It is not needed by the base system. We really do not want
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:12:38AM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> IMO, this is a good reason to not have WARNS contain -Werror at this
> time. NO_WERROR is a good way to fix this (again IMO). I see a great
> need to let warnings "hang out", and in an ideal world I see an need
> for (new) warnings to
On 6 Feb, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:19:19AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>> BTW, how about, may be, if the stars are right, bringing in the Java
>> support too? gcj is now one of the compilers, that come with the GCC
>> package...
> Uh, NO! It is not needed by the ba
Take a look ath this diff:
--- /etc/nsmb.conf Wed Jan 30 05:31:21 2002
+++ ./etc/nsmb.conf Wed Feb 6 16:20:55 2002
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# $FreeBSD: src/etc/nsmb.conf,v 1.4 2002/01/29 00:23:34 cjc Exp $
+# $FreeBSD: src/etc/nsmb.conf,v 1.3 2002/01/07 08:41:55 sheldonh Exp $
#
# smbfs loo
On Wednesday 06 February 2002 06:10, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
[performance complaint snip]
> Could it be due to the DDB, INVARIANTS & WITNESS options in the
> kernel? If it is that's fine with me, I'm just wondering where
> that magnitude of a slowdown would be coming from.
I would think so (io
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:12:38AM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> > IMO, this is a good reason to not have WARNS contain -Werror at this
> > time. NO_WERROR is a good way to fix this (again IMO). I see a great
> > need to let warnings "hang out", and in an ideal world I see an need
> > for (new) wa
> Diffs like there show up for COUNTLESS times in mergemaster. In fact,
> nothing changed except the cvs id. Why am I asked about these in
> mergemaster? Is there a way to ignore files that only have the cvsid
> changed? This would speed up the mergemaster run considerably...
>
mergemaster onl
> "David" == David W Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> mergemaster only checks to see if RCSID's are different by
David> default, I forget which option, but there is one to actually
David> diff the two files when doing its inital compare, but the
David> RCSID's would
> The real question here is: why is the RCSid changing when the file
> isn't?
Sometimes things get changed and then backed out to their original state,
but you cannot keep the original RCSID
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the mes
At 9:13 AM -0800 2/6/02, David O'Brien wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:02:34AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>> WITNESS can really hurt. Quite possibly I should turn it off in
>> GENERIC now (I wouldn't mind if someone else did that.)
>
>I think it should stay. Especially as we are not getting
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:05:16PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > Uh, NO! It is not needed by the base system. We really do not want to
> > turn on all the support libs, etc.. that would be needed with this.
> > There is a reason the gcc30 port takes 25 minutes to compile on a fast
> > 1.2
> "David" == David W Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> Sometimes things get changed and then backed out to their
David> original state, but you cannot keep the original RCSID
I can see that happening on the head, but this also happens
on stable ...
To Unsubscribe: send mail
>
> I can see that happening on the head, but this also happens
> on stable ...
One example of it happening to -stable was the addittion of www to
master.passwd, www has been added and removed a few times from -stable. I'm
not trying to say that this explains all the times that it happens, just
I read recently on this list that the problem with the
-current binutils on Alphas had been fixed, did this also
fix the problem on i386 which caused ports such as imlib,
imlib2 and gnomelibs to behave weirdly as many of their
binaries would segfault during
configuring/linking/executing? I o
On 6 Feb, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:05:16PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>> > Uh, NO! It is not needed by the base system. We really do not want
>> > to turn on all the support libs, etc.. that would be needed with
>> > this. There is a reason the gcc30 port takes 25
At 11:34 AM -0700 2/6/02, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > "David" == David W Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> David> mergemaster only checks to see if RCSID's are different by
> David> default, I forget which option, but there is one to actually
> David> diff the two files when
What I think mergemaster should do is compere the file with the original
checked out one it claims to be and if it's the same, it should just
update silently.. i.e. if the user didn't change anything in th old one
he's unlikely to want to change anything in the new one
(maybe a datafile that
> What I think mergemaster should do is compere the file with the original
> checked out one it claims to be and if it's the same, it should just
> update silently.. i.e. if the user didn't change anything in th old one
> he's unlikely to want to change anything in the new one
>
> (maybe a da
for the set of patches at:
http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/adiff
these patches SHOULD NOT EFFECT your system except to do some
slight re-aranging of stuff in the kernel.
THe aim is to get this committed to 'clarify' the upcoming
KSE commit in http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/thediff
which include
I can't find the answer to this in a handbook search
- I can never get the right terms together 8(.
But I read this on google:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&threadm=a0tbme%2426hk%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&rnum=3&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dmaximum%2Bprocess%2Bsize%2Bfreebsd%2Bvirtual%2Bmemor
hi, there!
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:52:40PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> But alright, let's say -- ports. gcj and gcjh themselves are
> installed by the several lang/gcc* ports, but they are not functional
> (libgcj/libjava are not ported). As a ports committer I might try to
* Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020206 12:20] wrote:
>
> for the set of patches at:
> http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/adiff
>
> these patches SHOULD NOT EFFECT your system except to do some
> slight re-aranging of stuff in the kernel.
>
> THe aim is to get this committed to 'clarify' the
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:32:18PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020206 12:20] wrote:
> >
> > for the set of patches at:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/adiff
> >
> > these patches SHOULD NOT EFFECT your system except to do some
> > slight re-aranging
On 7 Feb, Max Khon wrote:
> dynamically linked libiberty would be a nightmare.
> libbfd anf libiberty do not have version numbers, are not maintained
> (i.e. there is no official releases). every project includes its own
> libiberty and imho an attempt to find least common denominator w
Does anyone know if the problem with kde and other programs not
working with the new binutils not working have been fixed yet?
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree Network Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* David W. Chapman Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020206 12:33] wrote:
> Does anyone know if the problem with kde and other programs not
> working with the new binutils not working have been fixed yet?
I find that mozilla 0.9.8 dies with pure virtual called or something
to that effect, however I don't
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Peter Schultz wrote:
> FreeBSD does not want to work with my USB mouse. I believe it to be a
> problem with the motherboard, a Tyan S1834. The mouse does work under
> BeOS and Windows so I know it's not toast. Also, the mouse works with
> FreeBSD on my Tyan S1832 motherboar
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Jacob Frelinger wrote:
> I have a new current system that is having the strangest problem.
> using vi or its clones often abruptly powers the system down, no panics,
> no syslog messages. the computer is an ABIT BP6 w/ 2 500 mhz cellerons
> (NOT OVERCLOCKED), two harddrives,
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Adam Nealis wrote:
> I think I've done due diligence, so may I respectfully
> ask if anyone can tell me what is the largest size in
> main RAM a process can have under FreeBSD?
It's limited to MAXDSIZ (max data size). You can raise this up to 2GB or
so, but you will eventual
Hi!
I updated my notebook from -stable to -current some days ago and get this
message ~ every second:
ACPI-0294: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_AML_REGION_LIMIT
Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:08:10PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Jacob Frelinger wrote:
>
> You aren't using a Linux version of vi, are you? It so happens a common
> freebsd system call maps to linux reboot()
>
it shouldn't be.
[jolly@spooky ~]# which vi
/usr/bin/vi
[joll
At 12:10 AM -0500 2/6/02, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>One simple test I tried was that I have a copy of the freebsd cvs
>repository in /usr/cvs/free, on it's own partition. Each system
>has it's own /usr/src, of course. I cvsup'ed /usr/cvs/free, and
>then did a
> time cvs status >/dev/null
>i
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well... it would be nice if people would do CORRECT fixes. From
> some things DES was saying, people are making some really stupid "fixes"
> just to quite warnings. Esp. WRT const.
Yes, the YP code is full of strdup()s that have no purpose other tha
Julian Elischer writes:
>
> for the set of patches at:
> http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/adiff
>
> these patches SHOULD NOT EFFECT your system except to do some
> slight re-aranging of stuff in the kernel.
Today's alpha kernel, plus those changes results in a ksp not valid
halt with the P
Andrew Gallatin writes:
>
> Since thread0 is no longer a pointer, this looks suspicious in locore.s:
>
> /*
> * Switch to proc0's PCB.
> */
> ldq t0,thread0 /* get phys addr of pcb */
> ldq a0,TD_MD_PCBPADDR(t0)
> S
Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> C'mon guys: it is not so long ago (days..) that the Alpha started
> buildworlding -current again. Alpha builds tend to take much
> longer (on most people's hardware that is) so a bit of patience
> would be nice.
>
> FWIW: I'm trying to get 2 of my Alphas
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:20:16PM -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > C'mon guys: it is not so long ago (days..) that the Alpha started
> > buildworlding -current again. Alpha builds tend to take much
> > longer (on most people's hardware that is) so a bit of
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:46:22PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > dynamically linked libiberty would be a nightmare.
>
> > libbfd anf libiberty do not have version numbers, are not maintained
> > (i.e. there is no official releases). every project includes its own
> > libiberty and imho a
From: Takanori Watanabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 23:16:21 +0900
> >I recently installed -current to ThinkPad X22. Though it seems that
> >X22's PC-Card slots work fine with -stable, in -current when probing
> >PCICs I got following message,
:
> How about disabling ACPI? I
> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well... it would be nice if people would do CORRECT fixes. From
> > some things DES was saying, people are making some really stupid "fixes"
> > just to quite warnings. Esp. WRT const.
>
> Yes, the YP code is full of strdup()s that have no purpo
I don't know the alpha at all but
how about
leaq t0, thread0
or some similar thing
or even..
ldq t0,$thread0
or something similar..
who's assembler is being used?
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Andrew Gallatin writes:
> >
> > Since thread0 is no longer a pointer, t
On 6 Feb, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:46:22PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>> > dynamically linked libiberty would be a nightmare.
>>
>> > libbfd and libiberty do not have version numbers, are not
>> > maintained (i.e. there is no official releases). every p
Apparently, On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:17:38PM -0500,
Andrew Gallatin said words to the effect of;
>
> Andrew Gallatin writes:
> >
> > Since thread0 is no longer a pointer, this looks suspicious in locore.s:
> >
> > /*
> > * Switch to proc0's PCB.
> > */
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:53:42PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On 6 Feb, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:46:22PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> >> > dynamically linked libiberty would be a nightmare.
> >>
> >> > libbfd and libiberty do not have version numbers,
how about a port that uses the installed sources
together with some uploaded parts to 'reconstitute' gcj as if it had been
compiled wit the rest of the system.
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > C'mon guys: it is not so long ago (days..) that t
Ok so since I don't know alpha assembly.
can it be changed to teh address of the thread0 structure?
(I'll bet the same thing needs to be done on the other
architectures)
THANKS!
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Julian Elischer writes:
> >
> > for the set of patches at:
> >
It is plain that many people will want to be able to install a version
of gcc that is officially supported and that also includes *all* of the
standard platforms that come as part of the gcc release.
What is so wrong with being able to specify a compilation flag that says
"install all of the extr
Jake Burkholder writes:
> > What's the "right" way to do this?
>
> I think you want lda, its used to load an address constant in support.s:
>
> lda t0, fusufault /* trap faults */
Bingo! Thanks.. I haven't done any alpha assembler in nearly a year..
Julian -- you n
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:23:32PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> It is plain that many people will want to be able to install a version
> of gcc that is officially supported and that also includes *all* of the
> standard platforms that come as part of the gcc release.
You do realize that means Ada f
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:45:14PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> configuring/linking/executing? I only ask because I
> would like to stop having to update my -current tree and
> then having to copy an old binutils over it so that
> things will work. Any information is appreciated.
first
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:15:29PM -0500, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> Apparently, On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:17:38PM -0500,
> Andrew Gallatin said words to the effect of;
>
> >
> > Andrew Gallatin writes:
> > >
> > > Since thread0 is no longer a pointer, this looks suspicious in locore.s:
Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> C'mon guys: it is not so long ago (days..) that the Alpha started
> buildworlding -current again.
I tried, and the new kernel blew up at start-up with an unaligned
access. GENERIC went farther, but died when /etc/rc redundandly
tried to load the osf1 mod
On 6 Feb, David O'Brien wrote:
> Yes it comes as part of binutils.
Ok.
> No we should not go down this path. You've already been told that
> there is no official libiberty or bfd release.
Well, the following URL
http://www.gnu.org/manual/bfd-2.9.1/
for example, seems to imply,
eni_transmit.o: In function `eni_output':
eni_transmit.o(.text+0x3aa): undefined reference to `MFREE'
eni_transmit.o(.text+0x3be): undefined reference to `MFREE'
eni_transmit.o(.text+0x47a): undefined reference to `MFREE'
fore_output.o: In function `fore_xmit_segment':
fore_output.o(.text+0x23b):
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Jake Burkholder writes:
> > > What's the "right" way to do this?
> >
> > I think you want lda, its used to load an address constant in support.s:
> >
> > lda t0, fusufault /* trap faults */
>
> Bingo! Thanks.. I have
David O'Brien writes:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:23:32PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> > It is plain that many people will want to be able to install a version
> > of gcc that is officially supported and that also includes *all* of the
> > standard platforms that come as part of the gcc release
Apparently, On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:01:44PM -0800,
Julian Elischer said words to the effect of;
>
> for the set of patches at:
> http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/adiff
>
> these patches SHOULD NOT EFFECT your system except to do some
> slight re-aranging of stuff in the kernel.
>
> TH
THANKS!
(3 down, 2 to go..)
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> Apparently, On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:01:44PM -0800,
> Julian Elischer said words to the effect of;
>
> >
> > for the set of patches at:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/adiff
> >
> > these patches SHOULD NOT E
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> That's the thing. gcc30 port, essentially, installs a copy of the
> compiler already available as part of the base. But the base is missing
> gcj (the port does too for now), so one would be forced to add the port.
Compilers from ports suck.
If you set DESTDIR, i
David O'Brien wrote:
> > But the base is missing
> > gcj (the port does too for now), so one would be forced to add the port.
>
> And the base system does not NEED a java compiler.
Or perl.
8-)
-- Terry
To Unsubscr
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > And the base system does not NEED a java compiler.
>
> Alright. But a FreeBSD installation -- might.
This bears on the fundamental problem of using the install
tools that come with external source code in order to do
installs.
Probably, it should be built by a make wo
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Jake Burkholder writes:
> > > What's the "right" way to do this?
> >
> > I think you want lda, its used to load an address constant in support.s:
> >
> > lda t0, fusufault /* trap faults */
>
> Bingo! Thanks.. I have
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I am starting to think all WARNS cleanup patches should be posted to
: audit and have an "Approved by: audit" or any of our accepted very
: knowledgeable C standards people.
I think this is a good idea since
Adam Nealis wrote:
>
> I can't find the answer to this in a handbook search
> - I can never get the right terms together 8(.
It's not in the handbook.
[ ... ]
> But I read this on google:
[ ... ]
> In the second part of the thread it references a thread
> discussed in December that discusses
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * David W. Chapman Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020206 12:33] wrote:
> > Does anyone know if the problem with kde and other programs not
> > working with the new binutils not working have been fixed yet?
>
> I find that mozilla 0.9.8 dies with pure virtual called or somethin
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: From: Takanori Watanabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 23:16:21 +0900
: > >I recently installed -current to ThinkPad X22. Though it seems that
: > >X22's PC-Card slots work fine with -stable, in -current when pro
Julian Elischer wrote:
> how about a port that uses the installed sources
> together with some uploaded parts to 'reconstitute' gcj as if it had been
> compiled wit the rest of the system.
FreeBSD does a fairly evil thing: it takes the compiler
source code post-config instead of pre-config.
It's
David O'Brien wrote:
> Why is binutils a nightmare??
Bad engineering?
8-)
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
David O'Brien wrote:
> You do realize that means Ada for 3.1 don't you? Pascal in the the works.
> Also that means bringing in Chill also for 2.95 and later.
Ugh.
> 1. They are not needed by the base system, nor are the part of a
> traditional BSD system.
Very valid point.
> 2. What is
Joe Kelsey wrote:
> David O'Brien writes:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:23:32PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> > > It is plain that many people will want to be able to install a version
> > > of gcc that is officially supported and that also includes *all* of the
> > > standard platforms that com
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> What is so hard about allowing someone to specify the list of frontends
> to provide at system build time? I thought that gcc was supposed to be
> a modular compiler system, and that all we are asking for is the ability
> to add to the
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> So what? When I install gcc on a non-native platform (such as HP-UX or
> Solaris),
> > Again, WHAT IS THE PROBLEM you are trying to solve? Just laziness of not
> > being willing to type ``pkg_add -r gcc30'' or ``pkg_add -r gcc3
David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> > What is so hard about allowing someone to specify the list of frontends
> > to provide at system build time? I thought that gcc was supposed to be
> > a modular compiler system,
You thought wrong. 8-).
> > a
Joe Kelsey wrote:
> David O'Brien writes:
> > 3. Are you going to maintain them? If we did do this work and allowed
> > people to optinally install gjc and Ada, I bet only 5% would do so
> > (other than the initial turning it on just to see what the compilers
> > looked like).
>
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:38:02PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On 6 Feb, David O'Brien wrote:
> > Yes it comes as part of binutils.
>
> Ok.
>
> > No we should not go down this path. You've already been told that
> > there is no official libiberty or bfd release.
>
> Well, the followi
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:54:22PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > how about a port that uses the installed sources
> > together with some uploaded parts to 'reconstitute' gcj as if it had been
> > compiled wit the rest of the system.
>
> FreeBSD does a fairly evil thing:
Terry Lambert wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > how about a port that uses the installed sources
> > together with some uploaded parts to 'reconstitute' gcj as if it had been
> > compiled wit the rest of the system.
>
> FreeBSD does a fairly evil thing: it takes the compiler
> source code post-
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> >
> > Jake Burkholder writes:
> > > > What's the "right" way to do this?
> > >
> > > I think you want lda, its used to load an address constant in support.s:
> > >
> > > lda t0, fusufault /
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: How many MB does your flash card where you're installing
: FreeBSD have on it?
I've installed a subsetted FreeBSD onto a 8MB CF card. For normal
FreeBSD (as oppsoed to pico), the smallest amount of space you
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
