Verba Volant 05-02-02

Verba Volant 05-02-02, Every day a new quotation translated into many languages. _ Quotation of the day: Author - Albert Einstein English - we are all very ignorant, but not all ignorant of the same things Italian - siamo tutti molto ignoranti, ma non tutti ignoriamo le stesse c

RE: Making bootable recovery CD using cdboot/loader fails

On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 18:47:25 -0500 (EST) > From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Michael Reifenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: FreeBSD-Current <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Making bootable recovery CD using cdboot/loader fails ... > and le

libexec/Makefile.inc breaks make release

Hi Kris, The commit to libexec/Makefile.inc to add WFORMAT?= 1 breaks releases because telnetd does not compile without warnings. John -- John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===> libexec/telnetd cc -nostdinc -O -pipe -DLINEMODE -DUSE_TERMIO -DDIAGNOSTICS -DOLD_ENVIRON -DE NV_H

Verba Volant

The following email address, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" has been removed from the Verba Volant Newsletter list. If you did not cancel your email address or you wish to continue receiving Verba Volant, please send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you and best regards, Verba Volant To Unsubscribe

Current World stops at rcp.yppasswdd

World is breaking for me at: ===> usr.sbin/rpc.yppasswdd cc -nostdinc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/rpc.yppasswdd/../../usr.sbin/vipw -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/rpc.yppasswdd/../../usr.sbin/ypserv -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/rpc.yppasswdd/../../libexec/ypxfr -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/rpc.yppasswdd/../../usr.bin/chp

Re: pam_ssh world breakage (was: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpam Makefile.inc)

On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:06:54PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > If you use the argument that one shouldn't set WARNS because a new > compiler will cause the tree to break, then there's no point having it > at all since that condition will always be true. The difference is _impending_. -- -- D

Bizzare problem..

I have a new current system that is having the strangest problem. using vi or its clones often abruptly powers the system down, no panics, no syslog messages. the computer is an ABIT BP6 w/ 2 500 mhz cellerons (NOT OVERCLOCKED), two harddrives, a cdrom drive and 256M ram. The bizzare bits..

[PATCH] ld(1) and shared libraries dependencies (was: Re: alpha cross-compiler hosed)

On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 10:50:58AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Hi! > > Some background first. > > I am currently working on cleaning up the "false dependencies" > issue for secure/. The attached patch p1 fixes this. This is > done by moving the false dependencies from secure/ utilities > di

Re: pam_ssh world breakage (was: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpam Makefile.inc)

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 07:20:46AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:06:54PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > If you use the argument that one shouldn't set WARNS because a new > > compiler will cause the tree to break, then there's no point having it > > at all since that co

Re: Current World stops at rcp.yppasswdd

>Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 06:21:34 -0800 >From: Edwin Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >World is breaking for me at: >===> usr.sbin/rpc.yppasswdd >... Following patch got through it for me: Index: usr.sbin/rpc.yppasswdd/pw_util.c === RCS fi

Re: Support for atapi cdrw as scsi in -current?

Garrett Wollman wrote: > < > >>I noticed a patch on freebsd-scsi a while back that >>added a not very complete form of atapi as scsi support >>to the freebsd kernel. Are there plans to complete >>this and add it to -current sometime before -current >>turns into 5.0-RELEASE? Thanks for any

Re: Support for atapi cdrw as scsi in -current?

> Is there a place where I can find this updated patch which will work for > me in the current -current? Thanks. I put up updated patches at http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/ For -CURRENT, you should be using the latest one (of today) which fixes a silly line inversion. I'd be v

Promise/ATA-Raid making panic in -CURRENT?

Hi! I checked and compiled the recent -CURRENT tree, buildworld and buildkernel goes all fine. When booting it seems to crash on initialization of my Promise controller and get "bad ivar request (4)". I stripped all possible drivers out of the kernelconfig, except for the ata driver, and it stil

Non x86 KSE testing

Non x86 FreeBSD developers: I have posted to http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/adiff a set of 'semi-cosmetic' "mechanical" diffs. The effect of the diffs is to remove all the places in the code which assume that the thread structure is embedded in the process structure, without doing any major alg

LINT failures (please check this)

ata-raid.o: In function `ar_attach': ata-raid.o(.text+0xc0): multiple definition of `ar_attach' if_ar.o(.text+0x10): first defined here /usr/libexec/elf/ld: Warning: size of symbol `ar_attach' changed from 663 to 777 in ata-raid.o The ata-raid author should have checked whether there was already

RE: Making bootable recovery CD using cdboot/loader fails

On 05-Feb-02 Michael Reifenberger wrote: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > >> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 18:47:25 -0500 (EST) >> From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: Michael Reifenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: FreeBSD-Current <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: RE: Making bootable

Not committing WARNS settings...

On Tuesday, February 5, 2002, at 01:04 , Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 07:20:46AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:06:54PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> If you use the argument that one shouldn't set WARNS because a new >>> compiler will cause the tree

Re: Not committing WARNS settings...

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 10:12:15PM -0500, Jeroen C.van Gelderen wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 07:20:46AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:06:54PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>> If you use the argument that one shouldn't set WARNS because a new > >>> compiler wil

Re: pam_ssh world breakage

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 07:20:46AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: : > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:06:54PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: : > > If you use the argument that one shouldn't set WARNS because a new : > > c

Re: Not committing WARNS settings...

At 8:08 PM -0800 2/5/02, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 10:12:15PM -0500, Jeroen C.van Gelderen wrote: > >> David is about to switch to GCC 3.0 and I guess he does not like moving >> targets. I would expect that for the GCC 4.0 upgrade a similar freeze > > request will go out. An

$B!*9-9p!*!!!!?7$7$$!!JXMx$JJ!;c(B$B$N!!

*** $B!*9-9p!*?7$7$$!!JXMx$JJ!;c$N!!pJs$H;W$$$*Aw$j?=$7>e$2$^$7$?!#(B *** $B$3$N%a!<%k$rITMW$H$5$l$kJ}$O62$lF~$j$^$9$,(B $B$3$N$^$^JVAw$/$@$5$$!#%a!<%k$NAw?.$r$R$+$($5$;$F$$$?$@$-$^$9!#

Performance of -current vs -stable

With 4.5-release out the door, I thought I'd start trying to use 5.0-current on my "main freebsd machine" instead of 4.x-stable. I figure at some point we (as developers) have got to try to migrate to that release as much as possible. I had been doing some stuff with 5.0-current at home. That s

Re: Performance of -current vs -stable

In message: Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Could it be due to the DDB, INVARIANTS & WITNESS options in the : kernel? If it is that's fine with me, I'm just wondering where : that magnitude of a slowdown would be coming from. No

Re: Not committing WARNS settings...

At 11:54 PM -0500 2/5/02, Garance A Drosihn wrote: >At 8:08 PM -0800 2/5/02, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>All David has to do is set WARNS=0 or NO_WERROR=1 in or >>/etc/defaults/make.conf temporarily when he tests and commits the >>changeover, and he'll sidestep all the problems. > >I would assume that

Re: Performance of -current vs -stable

I asked BDE about the same thing off-list: Yes, the debug options (INVARIANTS and WITNESS, especially the latter) slow down the kernel by a factor of 10 or so. Only progams that don't make many syscalls run reasonably fast. I only turn on these options for debugging (not often). Without them, s

Re: Not committing WARNS settings...

> > All David has to do is set WARNS=0 or NO_WERROR=1 in or > /etc/defaults/make.conf temporarily when he tests and commits the > changeover, and he'll sidestep all the problems. There's no need to > impose restrictions on the activities of other committers. > > It's really not a big deal, IMO

RE: Performance of -current vs -stable

On 06-Feb-02 Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Could it be due to the DDB, INVARIANTS & WITNESS options in the > kernel? If it is that's fine with me, I'm just wondering where > that magnitude of a slowdown would be coming from. WITNESS can really hurt. Quite possibly I should turn it off in GENERIC

Re: Not committing WARNS settings...

On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:58:53AM +0200, John Hay wrote: > > > > All David has to do is set WARNS=0 or NO_WERROR=1 in or > > /etc/defaults/make.conf temporarily when he tests and commits the > > changeover, and he'll sidestep all the problems. There's no need to > > impose restrictions on the

Re: Promise/ATA-Raid making panic in -CURRENT?

It seems Tom Servo wrote: > Hi! > > I checked and compiled the recent -CURRENT tree, > buildworld and buildkernel goes all fine. > > When booting it seems to crash on initialization of my > Promise controller and get "bad ivar request (4)". I > stripped all possible drivers out of the kernelconf

MFREE()

The following files under sys/ still use MFREE(): alpha/tc/am7990.c netatm/port.h security/lomac/kernel_socket.c Please fix. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunbay Software AG, [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251