Raman Ng wrote:
> I don't know what mailing list this mail should be
> posted to, sorry if it is posted to the wrong mailing
> list.
>
> Recently I found Linux 2.4 kernel is affected by the
> bug of extended paging in AMD Athlon through the
> following link. I don't know if FreeBSD is also
> aff
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:55:13PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Emiel Kollof wrote:
>
> >
> > Julian Elischer heeft op maandag 21 januari 2002 om 08:34 het volgende
> > geschreven:
> >
> > >
> > > Lots of my old programs get:
> > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/l
Hello,
I just upgraded to -current today to get a couple of
features including devfs working. In the process I
have run into a few questions (mainly things to do with
the fact that up until a few days ago I was only using
linux 2.4.x):
1) Will either the in kernel or oss sound driver for
First off, you sent this to the wrong list. Most of the questions you
bring up in here should have been directed at -questions.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:22:08AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just upgraded to -current today to get a couple of
> features including devfs working. In th
> I am well aware of this bug.
>
> It does not affect FreeBSD, which only uses 4M pages
> for
> the first 4M of the kernel itself.
>
> I've worked on code that enables 4M pages on other
> memory
> used in FreeBSD, that had this problem, but only if
> you
> were really stupid in your allocation m
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please explain two moments:
>
> 1) What is stack reaction on this option? Is it the same like PAM_AUTH_ERR
> reaction or not?
Yes.
> 2) Can PAM_SYSTEM_ERR be returned by pam_authenticate() ? If yes. login.c
> and ftpd.c must be fixed to add thi
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) When OPIE turned on in the system, not neccessary all users are
> OPIE-ed, only those who listed in /etc/opiekeys. It means that
> pam_opieaccess() module must do something only for valid OPIE users
> listed in /etc/opiekeys and do nothing fo
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Umm, you can't use opiechallenge() for that. You're not supposed to
> call opiechallenge() without also calling opieverify() (plus, I think
> opiechallenge() "consumes" a challenge). Use opielookup() instead.
Even better, opie_haskey() (which is
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 13:54:29 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> Umm, you can't use opiechallenge() for that. You're not supposed to
> call opiechallenge() without also calling opieverify() (plus, I think
No, it is possible, when opieunlock() called afterwards (as I do).
BTW, the same way
This is looking good!
Please keep a close eye on style (there is at least one assignment in
an if () statement that needs to move out. :-)
M
> --=-=-=
>
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Umm, you can't use opiechallenge() for that. You're not supposed to
> > call opiechall
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 14:07:48 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Umm, you can't use opiechallenge() for that. You're not supposed to
> > call opiechallenge() without also calling opieverify() (plus, I think
> > opiechallenge() "consumes" a c
Hi Tom,
No, I have this same card running on a Toshiba Tecra 8100,
and it does indeed use the dc driver, and the ethernet part
of it does indeed work (I'm running Current, last updated yesterday).
The dc driver needs the miibus device configured in the kernel in order
to work correctly, and it a
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 14:07:48 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Umm, you can't use opiechallenge() for that. You're not supposed to
> > > call opiechallenge() without also calling opieverify() (plus, I think
> > > opiechallenge() "con
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:43:28PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Once you guys have this all hammered out, are you going to
> integrate PAM and Kerberos? 8-) 8-) 8-).
In what way do you mean?
--
Jacques A. Vidrine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.nectar.cc/
NTT/Verio SME
Does anybody mind if I change the pam_opie(8) prompt from "Password:"
to "Response:"? I think users might be slightly confused when they
enter an incorrect or empty response twice and get a new "Password:"
prompt and don't realize it's the pam_unix(8) prompt.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
This fixes reflects pam_opieaccess addition.
Few comments:
ftpd: fallback was a hack and not needed now with new pam_opieaccess
login: I believe that there is no authtok change service provided by
pam_opie module, so remove
#password sufficient pam_opie.so no_warn
line
--- ft
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:18:32PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Does anybody mind if I change the pam_opie(8) prompt from "Password:"
> to "Response:"? I think users might be slightly confused when they
> enter an incorrect or empty response twice and get a new "Password:"
> prompt and don
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 15:18:32 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Does anybody mind if I change the pam_opie(8) prompt from "Password:"
> to "Response:"? I think users might be slightly confused when they
> enter an incorrect or empty response twice and get a new "Password:"
> prompt and don't
> Does anybody mind if I change the pam_opie(8) prompt from "Password:"
> to "Response:"? I think users might be slightly confused when they
> enter an incorrect or empty response twice and get a new "Password:"
> prompt and don't realize it's the pam_unix(8) prompt.
Nope - that sounds good!
M
> and I've "made world" a lot of times like that.
> and if I do it by hand as sugested, it doesn;t make any difference
> either.
Just a guess - have you removed existing old libraries from /usr/lib?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of t
Some -current binaries can have this, but recompiling usually fixes
it. Also, I have some older 3.x binaries that I had to install
COMPAT3 to get working.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 17:29:01 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > enter an incorrect or empty response twice and get a new "Password:"
> > prompt and don't realize it's the pam_unix(8) prompt.
>
> Wait... First of all, there (I mean original OPIE) must be 2 prompts in
> worst case, not 3 pro
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 15:18:32 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Does anybody mind if I change the pam_opie(8) prompt from "Password:"
> > to "Response:"? I think users might be slightly confused when they
> > enter an incorrect or empty res
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can't reproduce your 3 prompts situation (or may I misread what you try
> to say?) I got only 2 prompts in login and su.
des@des ~% login des
otp-md5 496 de6973 ext
Password:
otp-md5 496 de6973 ext
Password [echo on]:
Password:
Last login: Mo
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This fixes reflects pam_opieaccess addition.
Augh, I just spent about an hour doing just that (and fixing some
other stuff too). Thanks anyway, I'll compare your patches to mine to
see if we disagree anywhere.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMA
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 16:13:54 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I can't reproduce your 3 prompts situation (or may I misread what you try
> > to say?) I got only 2 prompts in login and su.
>
> des@des ~% login des
> otp-md5 496 de6973 ext
>
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 16:11:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> > Back to your subj.: It breaks, at least, M$ Windows OPIE/Skey generators
> > which do auto-paste when keyword (Password) is found.
>
> Good point. "OPIE Password" might be more appropriate, then.
We don't know, what exac
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This fixes reflects pam_opieaccess addition.
OK, comments:
1) there's no reason to have pam_opie commented out now, it won't do
anything unless OPIE is enabled for the target user. With my
patch, any user can use OPIE by simply running op
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 16:33:57 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> 1) there's no reason to have pam_opie commented out now, it won't do
One reason still exist: all users (i.e. non-OPIE too) will see OTP
responses when pam_opie will be uncommented. It may leads to confusion or
wrong automated
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I see it too now. It is definitely some bug here. When I say "in
> login" I mean I test it through:
The bug is quite simply that pam_opie(8) never sets the AUTHTOK item,
so pam_unix(8) doesn't know that the user already entered a password.
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The bug is quite simply that pam_opie(8) never sets the AUTHTOK item,
> so pam_unix(8) doesn't know that the user already entered a password.
>
> I believe pam_get_pass() should set PAM_AUTHTOK. Any objections?
OK, now I'm really off my rocker;
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 16:33:57 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> Patch attached.
I already comment "always turning opie on" in previous message, besides
that I don't understand one thing in your patch: why you not enable
pam_opie for "su" and not add pam_opieaccess there? It is enough usef
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One reason still exist: all users (i.e. non-OPIE too) will see OTP
> responses when pam_opie will be uncommented. It may leads to confusion or
> wrong automated scripts processing.
Ah, I thought pam_opie(8) ignored users that didn't have OPIE set
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I already comment "always turning opie on" in previous message, besides
> that I don't understand one thing in your patch: why you not enable
> pam_opie for "su" and not add pam_opieaccess there? It is enough useful
> for sysadmin logging in as use
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 16:33:57 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> >
> > 1) there's no reason to have pam_opie commented out now, it won't do
>
> One reason still exist: all users (i.e. non-OPIE too) will see OTP
> responses when pam_opie will be uncommented. It may leads to confusion or
> w
> "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, I see it too now. It is definitely some bug here. When I say "in
> > login" I mean I test it through:
>
> The bug is quite simply that pam_opie(8) never sets the AUTHTOK item,
> so pam_unix(8) doesn't know that the user already entered a
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:45:21AM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > and I've "made world" a lot of times like that.
> > and if I do it by hand as sugested, it doesn;t make any difference
> > either.
> Just a guess - have you removed existing old libraries from /usr/lib?
>
lib/compact/Makefile.i
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, now I'm really off my rocker; pam_conv_pass() (called by
> pam_get_pass()) does set PAM_AUTHTOK. I still don't understand why
> it's NULL by the time pam_unix(8) calls pam_get_pass(). I'll
> investigate further.
I found the bug: login(1) onl
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 16:54:56 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Ah, I thought pam_opie(8) ignored users that didn't have OPIE set up.
In fact, there is no consensus about that among standalone OPIE
applications, some acts with fake prompts, some - without.
One (among others) argument _for
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 16:45:41 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> The bug is quite simply that pam_opie(8) never sets the AUTHTOK item,
> so pam_unix(8) doesn't know that the user already entered a password.
>
> I believe pam_get_pass() should set PAM_AUTHTOK. Any objections?
No objections.
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 16:54:56 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> One (among others) argument _for_ "no fake prompts" is that standalone
> application once compiled with OPIE support can't dynamically turn off
> fake prompts using some configura
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 17:14:24 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > OK, now I'm really off my rocker; pam_conv_pass() (called by
> > pam_get_pass()) does set PAM_AUTHTOK. I still don't understand why
> > it's NULL by the time pam_unix(8) calls
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 17:24:28 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> - enable OPIE by default, with the no_fake_prompts option, leaving it
>up to the admin to enable fake prompts if he so wishes
I vote for this one.
> Please, I'm getting paid to do this :) Make yourself a cup of tea or
> s
The problem(s) with sudo have been fixed in the latest sudo CVS release.
This works for me on -CURRENT as of December 16th, 2001 and RELENG_4
--- /tmp/sudo-1.6.5p1/auth/pam.c Mon Dec 31 12:18:12 2001
+++ /home/ancient/test/sudo/auth/pam.c Mon Jan 21 06:54:37 2002
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
#i
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 17:24:28 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > - enable OPIE by default, with the no_fake_prompts option, leaving it
> >up to the admin to enable fake prompts if he so wishes
> I vote for this one.
I agree, for the rea
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 18:01:45 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> 3) in pam_opie(8), return PAM_AUTH_ERR if no_fake_prompts was
> specified and the user hasn't set up OPIE.
We can speed up pam_opie by saving one opielookup() call in this way:
/*
* Don't call the OPIE a
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 18:01:45 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> 1) if pam_get_pass(), if the current token is non-null but empty,
> ignore it. This allows a user to just press enter at an OPIE
> prompt and still get a Unix prompt.
I am not sure I understand this fully, could you
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We can speed up pam_opie by saving one opielookup() call in this way:
True, except you forgot to call opieunlock() :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-curren
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 18:33:22 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We can speed up pam_opie by saving one opielookup() call in this way:
>
> True, except you forgot to call opieunlock() :)
No, when opiechallenge() return != 0, no opieunlock()
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am not sure I understand this fully, could you please send two
> typescripts (in the manner you do for login testing) with and without this
> change?
Assuming no ~des/.opiealways,
- without the change:
des@des ~% login des
otp-md5 496 de6973
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most people I know of that netboot boxes on Intel platforms now use
> PXE.
But well, there are only two NICs that support PXE, aren't there? In
particular, there's nothing cheap (i. e. <= USD 10) you could use in
conjunction with an old junk ISA NIC pe
Hello,
anyone running a recent -current
successfuly with the i4b ISDN drivers?
I built -current around christmas,
and had to applay a patch posted here
in October to make a kernel with i4b
drivers.
However I don't manage to establish
a kernel ppp connection to my provider
since then.
Regards,
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tom Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Warner, do you have any clues on how to get the modem half of this
: card working again?
You'd have to a) fix the pci attachment or b) wait until the puc
driver hits the tree. Chances are fixing the pci attachm
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, when opiechallenge() return != 0, no opieunlock() needed because
> nothing is locked. Look at opiechallenge() sources, it not makes
> lock on error.
Oh, you're right. I wasn't thinking.
Here are the (hopefully) final patches. Any final ob
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 18:46:37 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> Assuming no ~des/.opiealways,
>
> - without the change:
>
> des@des ~% login des
> otp-md5 496 de6973 ext
> Password:
> otp-md5 496 de6973 ext
> Password [echo on]:
> Login incorrect
> login:
It looks like right varian
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 18:53:34 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> Here are the (hopefully) final patches. Any final objections before I
> commit the lot?
Excepting get_pass() thing cause 3 prompts again, all looks right.
--
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/
To Unsubscribe: send mail
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 21:13:19 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 18:46:37 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> >
> > Assuming no ~des/.opiealways,
> >
> > - without the change:
> >
> > des@des ~% login des
> > otp-md5 496 de6973 ext
> > Password:
> > otp-md5 496 de697
> Here are the (hopefully) final patches. Any final objections before I
> commit the lot?
According to EyeBall Mk1, this is fine! :-)
I haven't extensively tested the code, but the methods used and the
design are very sound, I believe.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_ FreeBSD Services Limited
this machine has never been 3.x.
the binaries worked fine up until about 5 months ago.
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Some -current binaries can have this, but recompiling usually fixes
> it. Also, I have some older 3.x binaries that I had to install
> COMPAT3 to get working.
>
no, should I?
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > and I've "made world" a lot of times like that.
> > and if I do it by hand as sugested, it doesn;t make any difference
> > either.
> Just a guess - have you removed existing old libraries from /usr/lib?
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mai
> no, should I?
Only if you have older libraries with the same names as as ones
installed in /usr/lib/compat. As Ruslan pointed out, existing Makefiles
in lib/compat should take care of that automatically. The change was
added in last September.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 21:24:25 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > > - without the change:
> > >
> > > des@des ~% login des
> > > otp-md5 496 de6973 ext
> > > Password:
> > > otp-md5 496 de6973 ext
> > > Password [echo on]:
> > > Login incorrect
> > > login:
>
> If OPIE is configured to al
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It looks like right variant. _By_default_ OPIE user is unable to enter
> Unix password. You need to add
> permit 255.255.255.255
> line to /etc/opieaccess to _allow_ Unix passwords on your machine.
Which I do...
# grep '^[^#]' /etc/opieaccess
p
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 19:40:40 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> Which I do...
>
> # grep '^[^#]' /etc/opieaccess
> permit 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255
> permit 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
Really there must be only address resolved from gethostname() call,
what f.e. "su" sets for PAM_RHOST on loc
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 19:40:40 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > # grep '^[^#]' /etc/opieaccess
> > permit 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255
> > permit 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
> Really there must be only address resolved from gethostname() call,
> wha
Marc Ernst Eddy van Woerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However I don't manage to establish
> a kernel ppp connection to my provider
> since then.
You're using the correct version of sppp? We recently abandoned the
private sys/i4b/driver/i4b_ispppsubr.c (finally), and have i4b use
sys/net/if_s
On 21 Jan, Marc Ernst Eddy van Woerkom wrote:
> anyone running a recent -current
> successfuly with the i4b ISDN drivers?
Yes.
> I built -current around christmas,
> and had to applay a patch posted here
> in October to make a kernel with i4b
> drivers.
I think it was my patch. Something with
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 18:32:43 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 16:11:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> >
> > > Back to your subj.: It breaks, at least, M$ Windows OPIE/Skey generators
> > > which do auto-paste when keyword (Password) is found.
> >
> > Good point
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> it gives impression that no normal Unix password can be typed at this
> point.
...which I initially thought was the case, but it's not.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
Well, now almost all things work as they expected to be, only one thing
left is promised by Mark srandomdev() fix.
Thanks to all, especially to Dag-Erling.
--
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of t
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: this machine has never been 3.x.
: the binaries worked fine up until about 5 months ago.
All bets are off if it ran -current. You need to rebuild everything.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PRO
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:54:38PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : this machine has never been 3.x.
> : the binaries worked fine up until about 5 months ago.
>
> All bets are off if it ran -current. You
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"David W. Chapman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:54:38PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : this machine has never been 3.x.
:
--- libpam/Makefile.old Thu Dec 13 12:26:56 2001
+++ libpam/Makefile Mon Jan 21 23:09:16 2002
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@
.endif
STATIC_MODULES+= ${MODOBJDIR}/pam_nologin/libpam_nologin.a
STATIC_MODULES+= ${MODOBJDIR}/pam_opie/libpam_opie.a
+STATIC_MODULES+= ${MODOBJDIR}/pam_opieaccess/libpam_opieacc
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks to all, especially to Dag-Erling.
Thanks to *you* for pointing out and explaining the issues, submitting
patches, and reviewing and testing mine. I'm sorry we got off on such
a bad foot this weekend; I feel that the exchanges we've had yes
Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You have to use rev. 1.60 of /sys/netinet/in.c ("cd
> /sys/netinet;
No, you're wrong. This bug has been fixed as one of the first of my
series of committs that brought the i4b version of sppp back into the
mainstream version. Otherwise i could n
I reinstalled the 4.x compat libs but it didn't make any difference.:-(
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "David W. Chapman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:54:38PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In mess
Thanks, I'll commit that right away.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:19:50PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Thanks to all, especially to Dag-Erling.
>
> Thanks to *you* for pointing out and explaining the issues, submitting
> patches, and reviewing and testing mine. I'm sorry we g
* Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020121 12:20] wrote:
> "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Thanks to all, especially to Dag-Erling.
>
> Thanks to *you* for pointing out and explaining the issues, submitting
> patches, and reviewing and testing mine. I'm sorry we got of
step 8
a summary for the rest of us?
I got lost there in the middle soemwhere.
On 21 Jan 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Thanks to all, especially to Dag-Erling.
>
> Thanks to *you* for pointing out and explaining the issues, submitting
>
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> step 8
> a summary for the rest of us?
> I got lost there in the middle soemwhere.
http://people.freebsd.org/~des/diary/2002.html#2002-01-21
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubs
"Jacques A. Vidrine" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:43:28PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Once you guys have this all hammered out, are you going to
> > integrate PAM and Kerberos? 8-) 8-) 8-).
>
> In what way do you mean?
In the way that the author of the PAM architecture from Sun
sp
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:48:39PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Jacques A. Vidrine" wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:43:28PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > Once you guys have this all hammered out, are you going to
> > > integrate PAM and Kerberos? 8-) 8-) 8-).
> >
> > In what way
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:24:44 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> step 8
> a summary for the rest of us?
> I got lost there in the middle soemwhere.
Most shortest one, I think:
1) OPIE auth now works as required.
2) OPIE is turned on by default.
Both cases affects only users registered in OPIE
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Does anybody mind if I change the pam_opie(8) prompt from "Password:"
> to "Response:"? I think users might be slightly confused when they
> enter an incorrect or empty response twice and get a new "Password:"
> prompt and don't realize it's the pam_unix(8) prompt.
S
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:18:32PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Does anybody mind if I change the pam_opie(8) prompt from "Password:"
> > to "Response:"? I think users might be slightly confused when they
> > enter an incorrect or empty response twice and get a ne
"Jacques A. Vidrine" wrote:
> > In the way that the author of the PAM architecture from Sun
> > spoke at the Silicon Valley BSD User's Group meeting,
>
> Do you have a reference, or do we have to guess what you are talking
> about? :-)
I have my memory of the talk he gave, which included the ide
memset() in opiechallenge() really is not needed because it is the very
first thing opielookup() does being entered, i.e. look at this:
int opielookup FUNCTION((opie, principal), struct opie *opie AND char *principal)
{
int i;
memset(opie, 0, sizeof(struct opie));
...
And then the patch inc
On 2002-01-21 09:22:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 5) In -current would it be possible to have a few command line
> switches added to certain userland utilities? I noticed -h made it
> into `ls` now, but `cp` still doesn't have -a or -x which I used to
> use all the time in Linux. I know -a isn'
I'm running -current and have a Maxtor 160GB hdd hooked to the promise
ata133 card that came with it it will flake out for no apparent
reason. any clues? maybe bad hardware? anyone else getting these?
ad4: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting
ata2: resetting devices .. done
ad4:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> has NO effect whatsoever.
>
> The only thign I can do is recompile any package that has thos problem.
> but sometimes it's hard finding which package needs to be recomiled.
>
> thoughts?
You might also need compat3. I was quite surprised at the
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I reinstalled the 4.x compat libs but it didn't make any difference.:-(
Then you must have -current binaries that are too old. You will have
to rebuild them.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PRO
I've got a machine with 4G of RAM, and I'm trying to test all the RAM out
to make sure it's okay.
I've tried doing buildworlds, but never end up using more than 1G of RAM on
cache, etc.
I've got -current and -stable on it, and I've tried making an MFS
filesystem under -stable. I can't seem to
On Monday 21 January 2002 10:20 pm, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> I've got a machine with 4G of RAM, and I'm trying to test all the RAM out
> to make sure it's okay.
>
> I've tried doing buildworlds, but never end up using more than 1G of RAM on
> cache, etc.
>
> I've got -current and -stable on it, a
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 22:18:51 -0700, Samuel J.Greear wrote:
> On Monday 21 January 2002 10:20 pm, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> > I've got a machine with 4G of RAM, and I'm trying to test all the RAM out
> > to make sure it's okay.
> >
> > I've tried doing buildworlds, but never end up using more t
It seems Mike Brancato wrote:
> I'm running -current and have a Maxtor 160GB hdd hooked to the promise
> ata133 card that came with it it will flake out for no apparent
> reason. any clues? maybe bad hardware? anyone else getting these?
>
> ad4: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetti
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2002-01-21 09:22:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>5) In -current would it be possible to have a few command line
>>switches added to certain userland utilities? I noticed -h made it
>>into `ls` now, but `cp` still doesn't have -a or -x which I used to
>>use al
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Kenneth D. Merry" writes:
>Is there a way, under -current or -stable, to make a true RAMdisk that is
>around 2GB in size?
Possibly. If you take the detour around a preloaded image for the md(4)
driver it should be possible.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX si
While I realize you can't emulate the switches on any command on any os, I
found a few "linuxism's" missing.
Eg: I find it illogical, that "route" can change, and also display the
route to a single host, but route can not display the entire route table.
In linux it is simply "route", in windows i
100 matches
Mail list logo
