Hi,
I frequently see panics when I connect or disconnect USB devices. It
seems this is fallout from application software not handling the
device correctly, i.e. it only occurs (IIRC) after some application
program had problems with the device, an example being gphoto2 which
is currently unable t
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 05:59:27PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Timothy Aslat wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Quick question. Where would I find information on downgrading a
> > -CURRENT to a -STABLE or -RELEASE?
> >
> > I'm just trying to avoid doing a reinstall and re-setup from scratch.
>
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> FWIW, modern -CURRENT's should be able to downgrade to -STABLE
> without problems. If it's broken, please let me know, and I'll
> fix it. I mean "if it WILL be broken", as tonight's -CURRENT
> has successfully built -STABLE. Didn't test the `installworld'
> part, but I d
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 01:27:08AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > FWIW, modern -CURRENT's should be able to downgrade to -STABLE
> > without problems. If it's broken, please let me know, and I'll
> > fix it. I mean "if it WILL be broken", as tonight's -CURRENT
> > has su
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Um, what do you mean by "config file changes"? Of course
> you can't use stock 5.0-CURRENT config files, it's clear.
> As for config(8), it's in bootstrap-tools, and shouldn't
> be a problem. Buildkernel works fine here.
Configuration files, like /etc/pam.conf. For exam
On 17-Jan-02 Mike Brancato wrote:
> Just leting you guys know that the Jan 15th and Jan 16th boot floppies
> aren't working. the Jan 13th snaps are though.
How do they not work? We can't fix anything if you don't tell us what is
wrong. :)
> mike
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< ht
oh, well. They say something along the lines of
"Disk error: lba is 0x9 (should be 0x10)"
or similar. then it trys to boot the kernel twice using the loader, but
fails with the path 0:fd(0,a)/kernel
i tried it in vmware with the same results comming right from the image.
mike
On Thu, 17 Jan 2
±ÍÇÏÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò´Â À¥¼ÇÎÁß,
http://daosio.com/kims/kimsboard.cgi?db=humor3&action=list&p=1
¿¡¼ ¾Ë°Ô µÈ°ÍÀ̸ç,
E-Mail ÁÖ¼Ò ¿Ü¿¡, ´Ù¸¥ Á¤º¸´Â °®°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.
Á¤ÅëºÎ ±Ç°í»çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó°í Ç¥±âÇÑ ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸¸é ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ´·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä
speed2.htm
Description: Binary dat
In message , Mike Brancato wr
ites:
>oh, well. They say something along the lines of
>"Disk error: lba is 0x9 (should be 0x10)"
>or similar. then it trys to boot the kernel twice using the loader, but
>fails with the path 0:fd(0,a)/kernel
Hmm, t
Mike Brancato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> oh, well. They say something along the lines of
> "Disk error: lba is 0x9 (should be 0x10)"
> or similar. then it trys to boot the kernel twice using the loader,
> but fails with the path 0:fd(0,a)/kernel
I have to confirm this, for a self-made "make
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
...
> Oops. There should be no alias for md10c. Try this version. It fixes
> the "may want an alias case" in dkmodminor() and moves all the dk inlines
> to subr_diskslice.c.
This patch works better.
This brings us back to the original problem :-)
Now it d
no problem.
keep up the good work.
mike
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Ian Dowse wrote:
> In message , Mike Brancato wr
> ites:
> >oh, well. They say something along the lines of
> >"Disk error: lba is 0x9 (should be 0x10)"
> >or similar. then it trys t
In message , Mike Brancato wr
ites:
>no problem.
>keep up the good work.
>
>mike
Ok, it's fixed now. If you'd like to try it, there's an updated
version of the kern.flp from today's -CURRENT snapshot at:
http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~iedowse/F
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 05:25:52PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Chad David wrote:
> > The direct cause is a bug in my client. I call close(2) out side of the
> > main loop (one line off :( ), so none of the client side sockets were
> > getting closed. When I fixed this all of the connections we
seems to work in vmware now.
maybe i'll cvsup my source and rebuild my machine tonight. fun.
thanks.
mike
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Ian Dowse wrote:
> In message , Mike Brancato wr
> ites:
> >no problem.
> >keep up the good work.
> >
> >mike
>
> Ok
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_6295_5913.003E"
It turns that this problem is specific to AIO in
-CURRENT. I wrote a simple program that uses
the three different completion mechanisms (polling
with aio_error, polling with kevent, and using SIGIO)
to fill up a file by writing 8kb at a time to the
file and then reading 8kb at a time from the fil
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_6F12_7491.2AC3"
18 matches
Mail list logo