On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 09:12:18PM -0600, Joe Halpin wrote:
> I'm getting the following error when running 'make buildworld'
>
> perl
>
>-I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/des/asm:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/perlasm
> /usr/src/secure/l
Thats what I did yesterday, and buildworld/installworld worked fine
after that :))
Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Barcroft
> writes:
> : > Any suggestions?
> :
> : I would recommend removing the __FBSD() line locally until this has
> : been re
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> I'd like to drop the support for the man(1)'s -m option,
> which is almost undocumented and is of little interest.
> Unless I hear any valid objections, I am going to nuke
> it on Friday.
How do you propose we look at Alpha specific man pages on x86
boxes, after this chang
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 11:32:48AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > I'd like to drop the support for the man(1)'s -m option,
> > which is almost undocumented and is of little interest.
> > Unless I hear any valid objections, I am going to nuke
> > it on Friday.
>
> How do y
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 09:12:18PM -0600, Joe Halpin wrote:
> > I'm getting the following error when running 'make buildworld'
> >
> > perl
> >
>-I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/des/asm:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/
hi
does anyone know if this is/will be supported?
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, MCSE, MCNE, CLS, LCA
Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Hi,
I know, this is not the right place, but my best wishes
to the whole freebsd community for doing such a great job.
To all of you *** merry christmas and happy new year ***
regards,
--
Jean Louis Ntakpe Texas Instruments - Freising
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wafer Fab Automat
Heyas
After upgrading directly to CURRENT from 4.3-
RELEASE I've been presented with a rather loud and
whiney bug (I thought it at first to be my ex-
girlfriend somehow manifested via `festival` but
thk god it was not). Every shared library on the
system drops via ld-elf.so.1 regarding the sy
>Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 06:14:14 -0800 (PST)
>From: north star <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>After upgrading directly to CURRENT from 4.3-
>RELEASE I've been presented with a rather loud and
>whiney bug (I thought it at first to be my ex-
>girlfriend somehow manifested via `festival` but
>thk god it
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> Does anyone know when installation of -CURRENT from CD-ROM got broken or a
> solution thereof? We end up having two problems: the fixit shell doesn't
> work, but before that an actual installation doesn't work because
> sysinstall's attempt
Hi!
I'd like to drop bsd.man.mk support from bsd.kmod.mk,
because I was told by someone (peter?) that this is
the right direction. :-)
Objections?
Cheers,
--
Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunbay Software AG,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD commi
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know when installation of -CURRENT from CD-ROM got broken or a
> > solution thereof? We end up having two problems: the fixit shell doesn't
> > work, but before that an actual install
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The 'c' partition of acd0 devices was broken for the non-DEVFS case in
> > rev.104 of atapi-cd.c. (The errno for this is ENXIO.) DEVFS is not
> > in GENERIC and "make release" doesn't seem to add it.
>
> W
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> [Cc peter because he introduced this code]
>
> Hi,
> i was trying the following code in -current (basically copied from
> vm_zeropage.c), to implement device polling in the idle loop, and
> noticed that the process would take all of the CPU time. Being
> suspicious that somet
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:13:27AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
...
> Excellent catch! This particular problem was one of the main reasons
> why this is still defaulting to 'off'. I have a couple of other changes
> to it pending commit to fix some of Bruce's complaints, but I hadn't
> noticed the ca
On 20-Dec-01 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:13:27AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> ...
>> Excellent catch! This particular problem was one of the main reasons
>> why this is still defaulting to 'off'. I have a couple of other changes
>> to it pending commit to fix some of Bruce's c
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:16:03PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
...
> Priority propagation will already handle things ok. We drop to pri_native
> after we drop a lock (although if we still hold a contested lock we bump our
> priority to the min(nativepri, highest priority of threads on contested lo
On 20-Dec-01 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:16:03PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> ...
>> Priority propagation will already handle things ok. We drop to pri_native
>> after we drop a lock (although if we still hold a contested lock we bump our
>> priority to the min(nativepri, hig
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 12:06:24PM -0500, Peter Dufault wrote:
...
>> # cd /FreeBSD/FreeBSD-stable/src
>> # make installworld
>
>(Lot's of noise as the stable kernel installs the stable world. Then reboot)
You've missed a critical step here: Before you "reboot" you need to
run mergemaster. You
> I suspect that you failed to include
>
> COMPAT4X= yes
>
> in /etc/make.conf (as a review of the -current
> archives should have
> indicated).
>
> Cheers,
> david
Ah, worked beautifully! Thanks, David, I appreciate
it. I did look at the mail archives quickly but
usually if I don't see an
;EL PUEBLO TENDRA QUE VOLVER A SALIR A LA CALLE
AHORA COMIENZA EL REPARTO DE LA TORTA
SE FUE CAVALLO Y de la RUA, AHORA EMPIEZA LA VERDADERA BATALLA ENTRE LOS UD. NO VOTO.-
AHORA ES EL MOMENTO EN QUE PUERTA NO SABE DURANTE CUANTO TIEMPO GOBERNARA
AHORA ES EL MOMENTO EN QUE RUCKAUFT, DUHALDE,
===> share
===> share/colldef
colldef -I /usr/src/share/colldef -o bg_BG.CP1251.out
/usr/src/share/colldef/bg_BG.CP1251.src
...
/sv_SE.ISO8859-1.src
colldef -I /usr/src/share/colldef -o uk_UA.ISO8859-5.out
/usr/src/share/colldef/uk_UA.ISO8859-5.src
colldef: Char 0xcd duplicated near line 36
***
I'm starting to get spam since I joined this list, and the spam is
coming from freebsd.org. If I'm reading the headers right, it's coming
in through a freebsd.org mail server.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org ([216.136.204.119]) by
rwcrgwc54.attbi.com
(In
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Joe Halpin wrote:
>I'm starting to get spam since I joined this list, and the spam is
>coming from freebsd.org. If I'm reading the headers right, it's coming
>in through a freebsd.org mail server.
>Is this just a normal part of being on the list?
You're not getting the spam
< said:
> Is this just a normal part of being on the list?
Yes, lots of spammers spew at FreeBSD mailing-lists. If you can
identify a persistent source of spam, the postmaster is fairly
responsive in filtering them.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> does anyone know if this is/will be supported?
I believe it is supported by the "em" driver, which has been in
-current for a few weeks and was recently merged into -stable.
John
--
John Polstra
John D. Po
:I'm starting to get spam since I joined this list, and the spam is
:coming from freebsd.org. If I'm reading the headers right, it's coming
:in through a freebsd.org mail server.
Ha. In the last two weeks the amount of personal spam I receive has
gone up exponentially. I'm getting aro
27 matches
Mail list logo
