This email is of an ADULT NATURE, if you are not over 18 years old,
you must delete this message as you are not the intended recipient.
http://213.180.33.225/site2/
- FREE UNLIMITED ACCESS-
The horniest TEEN XXX online
50,000 Ultimate Fucking Channels
120,000
Any clues ?
flat# pwd
/flat/src/share/colldef
flat# make
colldef -I /flat/src/share/colldef -o hi_IN.ISCII-DEV.out
/flat/src/share/colldef/hi_IN.ISCII-DEV.src
colldef: map/name buffer overflow near line 81 of
/flat/src/share/colldef/map.ISCII-DEV, character 'i'
*** Error code 69
Stop in /flat
Hi.
I'm trying to compile smbfs. I've added SMBFS and NETSMB options to my kernel
config, but I'm not sure is it enough. The output of make buildkernel is as
follows:
-I/usr/src/sys/../include -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -elf
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:06:00 +0100, Przemyslaw Kowalczyk wrote:
| I'm trying to compile smbfs. I've added SMBFS and NETSMB options to my kernel
| config, but I'm not sure is it enough. The output of make buildkernel is as
| follows:
I don't think anyone's updated smbfs for the post-KSE world
hi, there!
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:30:54PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> | I'm trying to compile smbfs. I've added SMBFS and NETSMB options to my kernel
> | config, but I'm not sure is it enough. The output of make buildkernel is as
> | follows:
>
> I don't think anyone's updated smbfs for
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:47:15 +0600, Max Khon wrote:
| I have some untested patches in my tree and I will contact bp this
| week about them (I wanted to import smbfs userland to the tree and
| already got ok from bp but could not test it because kernel-side smbfs
| is not compilable yet).
Excel
hi, there!
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:55:24PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> | I have some untested patches in my tree and I will contact bp this
> | week about them (I wanted to import smbfs userland to the tree and
> | already got ok from bp but could not test it because kernel-side smbfs
> | i
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:58:10 +0600, Max Khon wrote:
| :)
| bp is quite responsive. I even had a talk with him on #bsdcode
Even more good news. I look forward to forgetting about the smbfs port!
:-)
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-curre
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:57:04 +0600 (NOVT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nickolay Dudorov) said:
> And I can buildkernel only after the next patch:
I don't reach that:
/usr/src/sys/modules/ciss/../../dev/ciss/ciss.c:3214: conflicting types for `cis
s_open'
/usr/src/sys/modules/ciss/../../dev/ciss/ci
The Problem was the use of vfs.ioopt=2 !
As long as vfs.ioopt is 1 or 2 the CDs are broken and with
vfs.ioopt=0 the CDs are o.k.
I didn't see any other problems with the use of vfs.ioopt=2,
especially no Filesystem corruption :-). Are there other known
problems withs vfs.ioopt != 0 ?
Ciao
I posted this on -hackers, it was suggested I post it to -current as well
I've encountered a problem using pthread_cancel, pthread_join and
pthread_setcanceltype, I'm hoping someone can shed some light.
(in a nutshell : pthread_setcanceltype doesn't seem to work)
(if there's a more appropriate
>From: Michael Harnois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:25:00 -0600
>On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:57:04 +0600 (NOVT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nickolay Dudorov) said:
>> And I can buildkernel only after the next patch:
>I don't reach that:
>/usr/src/sys/modules/ciss/../../dev/ciss/ciss.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nickolay Dudorov writes:
: And I can buildkernel only after the next patch:
I just removed this from build until Mike can fix the ciss driver
itself.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 15:44:37 +0100, Christoph Herrmann wrote:
>
> The Problem was the use of vfs.ioopt=2 !
> As long as vfs.ioopt is 1 or 2 the CDs are broken and with
> vfs.ioopt=0 the CDs are o.k.
>
> I didn't see any other problems with the use of vfs.ioopt=2,
> especially no Filesystem
On 28 Nov, Christoph Herrmann wrote:
>
> The Problem was the use of vfs.ioopt=2 !
> As long as vfs.ioopt is 1 or 2 the CDs are broken and with
> vfs.ioopt=0 the CDs are o.k.
>
> I didn't see any other problems with the use of vfs.ioopt=2,
> especially no Filesystem corruption :-). Are there oth
Garrett Wollman wrote:
>
> <
>said:
>
> > As from OpenBSD (in shorter form):
>
> > fd_set *fds = calloc(howmany(fd+1, NFDBITS), sizeof(fd_mask));
>
> But this is not portable. The application is not allowed to assume
> anything about the structure of an fd_set, or the existence of a ty
"Ilmar S. Habibulin" wrote:
>
> It works with latest sane.
Done.
-Maxim
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
SMBFS is broken, it will be fixed but I'm not sure when.
the other broken one in NWFS
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Przemyslaw Kowalczyk wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm trying to compile smbfs. I've added SMBFS and NETSMB options to my kernel
> config, but I'm not sure is it enough. The output of make buildkerne
The TechMail Anti-Virus Scanner found a potentially dangerous file
(New_Napster_Site.MP3.pif) sent from Jim Gansle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
The file was discovered attached to an email message addressed to you with a
subject of "Re:".
The attachment has been replaced with a safe text file and the
Warner Losh wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John McCullough writes:
>: pcib2: routed slot 15 INTA to irq 255
>: pccbb: Unable to map IRQ...
>: panic: resouce_list_release:can't find resource
>: Debugger("panic")
>
>This is a bug in pcibus issue. IRQ 255 should be treated as
>unallocated,
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nickolay Dudorov writ
> es:
> : And I can buildkernel only after the next patch:
>
> I just removed this from build until Mike can fix the ciss driver
> itself.
Sorry about this; I got distracted last night, and my last -current
test build was too long ago. 8
On 28-Nov-01 Mike Smith wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nickolay Dudorov
>> writ
>> es:
>> :And I can buildkernel only after the next patch:
>>
>> I just removed this from build until Mike can fix the ciss driver
>> itself.
>
> Sorry about this; I got distracted last night, and my
On 28-Nov-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> We don't do preemption in the kernel yet, so they need to yield the CPU when
>> another thread is available. The page zeroing thread does this wrong as it
>> should check procrunnable() instead of switching after do
I was just wondering if the following syscalls had any chance of being
implemented anytime soon?
linux: syscall ftruncate64 is obsoleted or not implemented (pid=5695)
linux: syscall mmap2 is obsoleted or not implemented (pid=5695)
linux: syscall mmap2 is obsoleted or not implemented (pid=5691)
l
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John McCullough writes:
: As I'm still learning, I hope my questions aren't too annoying,
:
: to do this would I have the kernel route to a different IRQ (say 10)
: instead of 255 by default?
You can't :-(. That's a bug in the code.
The questions aren't stupid.
I'm not sure if I'm sending this to the correct place, but since it is a
problem that will/could be fixed in -CURRENT, I'm assuming this is the right
place.
I tried to get the winex linux binary to run using the linux_base-6.1
libraries and I still got some errors, although not as many:
linu
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:55:58PM -0500, Kenneth Culver wrote:
> I'm not sure if I'm sending this to the correct place, but since it is a
> problem that will/could be fixed in -CURRENT, I'm assuming this is the right
> place.
>
> I tried to get the winex linux binary to run using the linux_ba
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:00:10 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> Any clues ?
Rebuild colldef from very latest sources.
BTW, colldef is already in bootstrap-tools
--
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in t
29 matches
Mail list logo
