On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Emiel Kollof wrote:
> The build and all goes well, but after a reboot. the kernel boots and
> just hangs on the acpi_cpu and refuses to go further.
> deleting the acpi.ko in /boot/kernel solves the problem for me. Is there
> any way to _disable_ acpi all together?
add hint.a
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 06:43:18PM -0500, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> >From the netstat output, it looks more like an application-level problem
> having to do with exhausting socket buffer space. Whatever the cause of
> the problem, it certainly isn't a lack of mbufs and/or clusters.
Sorry, my bad.
Hi,
it is the time again for me to investigate how diskless booting -current
is working today.
I've got a german Telekom TDSL line und must convert from my oldish
I4B diskless router (386/40) to a new one, that's capable to handle
the DSL speed at 768K/sec.
Since there are now to many diff
On Thursday 22 November 2001 12:10, Holm Tiffe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it is the time again for me to investigate how diskless
> booting -current is working today.
>
> I've got a german Telekom TDSL line und must convert from my
> oldish I4B diskless router (386/40) to a new one, that's
> capable to hand
hi all,
correct me if i am wrong.. but..
do you think, if we denied a shutdown after an su(1)
to root from a non-privileged user would be good...
i tried this same thing at home.. i builded it and
installed it.. works fine for me... the patch below
will allow a shutdown only be logging into root
Hiten Pandya wrote:
> do you think, if we denied a shutdown after an su(1)
> to root from a non-privileged user would be good...
It would be bad for me..
I do not allow any root login anywhere. The only way to become root is
to su to it. Your patch would make it impossible for me to shutdown the
Hiten Pandya writes:
> hi all,
>
> correct me if i am wrong.. but..
> do you think, if we denied a shutdown after an su(1)
> to root from a non-privileged user would be good...
>
> i tried this same thing at home.. i builded it and
> installed it.. works fine for me... the patch below
>
its ok...
but is there a list of problems that are awaiting to
be resolved in the CURRENT branch...
thanks...
--- "Vladimir B. Grebenschikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hiten Pandya writes:
> > hi all,
> >
> > correct me if i am wrong.. but..
> > do you think, if we denied a shutdown afte
Hi,
while researching a different problem (pccard ep with NEWBUS not
recognized since this morning), I got this panic a couple of
times:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0xdeadc0e2
fault code = supervisor write, page not present
instruction po
Hello, hackers.
What do you think about change the type of tsptype in
src/include/protocols/timed.h from (char *)
to (const char *) ?
$ grep -r protocols/timed.h /usr/src
/usr/src/bin/date/netdate.c:#include
/usr/src/usr.sbin/timed/timed/byteorder.c: * messages. Protocol is defined in
/usr/in
When I do a "make buildworld" I get an error about an
incomplete type for field 'inc4_route'. I've read the
/usr/src/UPDATING and found no real references to this type of
problem.
Am I jumping too far between 4.3-REL and current?
Do I need some compile options?
Do I need the compat4.x.i386 inst
* Landon Stewart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> When I do a "make buildworld" I get an error about an incomplete type for
> field 'inc4_route'. I've read the /usr/src/UPDATING and found no real
> references to this type of problem.
>
> Am I jumping too far between 4.3-REL and current?
Shouldn't
I'm told there is a fix for this in the latest current (ie.
re-CVSup). Apparently somewhere around line 49 of
src/usr.bin/systat/tcp.c it was missing a "#include
" .
jlemon commited a fix not too long ago.
At 08:48 PM 11/22/2001 +0100, Emiel Kollof wrote:
* Landon Stewart
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wro
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Darren
Henderson writes:
: Building a kernel (after a buildworld) with device adv fails with the info
: below...
Gotta add scsi system stuff too:
# SCSI peripherals
device scbus # SCSI bus (required)
device da # Direct Acc
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hiten Pandya writes:
: correct me if i am wrong.. but..
: do you think, if we denied a shutdown after an su(1)
: to root from a non-privileged user would be good...
I think it would be a horrible idea.
: this would be very good, i think if someone broke into
: a no
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 06:40:11AM -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> hi all,
>
> correct me if i am wrong.. but..
> do you think, if we denied a shutdown after an su(1)
> to root from a non-privileged user would be good...
I think this is a bad idea.
Kris
msg31979/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP si
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 11:49:00AM -0800, current-digest thus spoke:
>
> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 06:40:11 -0800 (PST)
> From: Hiten Pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [SUGGESTION] - disallowing shutdown after su(1)
> correct me if i am wrong.. but..
> do you think, if we denied a shutdown aft
On 2001-Nov-22 11:26:19 -0800, Landon Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>When I do a "make buildworld" I get an error about an incomplete type for
>field 'inc4_route'. I've read the /usr/src/UPDATING and found no real
>references to this type of problem.
>
>Am I jumping too far between 4.3-REL
* Hiten Pandya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[disallowing a su'ed root to shutdown the machine proposition snipped]
> this would be very good, i think if someone broke into
> a normal user and was able to gain access into root
> using su... (without a password..)
I fail to see anything 'good' in th
Äîðîãîé äðóã!
Èçâèíè, ÷òî îòáèðàþ òâîå âðåìÿ íà ÷òåíèå äàííîãî
ïîñëàíèÿ,òàê êàê ìû âñå
óñòàëè îò áåñêîíå÷íûõ ðåêëàìíûõ ðàññûëîê è âñÿ÷åñêîãî
ìóñîðà,íî ÿ íàäåþñü,
÷òî íåñêîëüêî ìèíóò çàòðà÷åííîãî âðåìåíè ñìîãóò
îêóïèòüñÿ, åñëè òû ðåøèøüñÿ
èçìåíèòü ñâîé âçãëÿä íà îêðóæàþùóþ òåáÿ
äåéñòâèòåëüíîñòü.
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Bob Vaughan wrote:
> > sources from yesterday evening. rebuild with kernel sources from tonight.
> > same results.
> >
> >
> > vt0: unknown trident VGA, 80 columns, color, 8 screens, unknown keyboard
> > Warning: Driver mistake: repeat make_dev ("ttyv0")
> > panic: don't do t
David Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch converts libfetch to use kqueue instead of select.
Why? It reduces neither the size nor the complexity of the code, and
does not result in any notable performance improvements.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: s
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> David Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This patch converts libfetch to use kqueue instead of select.
>
> Why? It reduces neither the size nor the complexity of the code, and
> does not result in any notable performance improvements.
For what it's worth, it al
23 matches
Mail list logo