On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 08-Nov-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
> > The i386 still uses archaic constraints for some
> > input-output operands ("0" for the first operand). These never worked
> > right and if fact don't actually work for compiling this file without
> > optimization.
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Raphael Korsoski writes:
: After upgrading from -STABLE I no longer have a MAKEDEV script in my /dev
: I didn't find anything on this in UPDATING, so I suspect I ought to have
: one :)
: I think I've missed something, so any pointers would be appreciated.
DEVFS doe
On 10-Nov-2001 Jim Bryant wrote:
> I have a [secondary] USB Keyboard with a mouse port on it's side installed,
> as well as a cameramate CompactFlash reader hooked up.
> Both work.
What chipset though?
The OHCI stuff seems less reliable than UHCI.
Not sure if its the hardware, the driver or
On 11-Nov-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On 08-Nov-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
>> > The i386 still uses archaic constraints for some
>> > input-output operands ("0" for the first operand). These never worked
>> > right and if fact don't actually work for compil
PIIX4, and I do think it's running under uhci.
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On 10-Nov-2001 Jim Bryant wrote:
>
>> I have a [secondary] USB Keyboard with a mouse port on it's side installed,
>> as well as a cameramate CompactFlash reader hooked up.
>> Both work.
>>
>
> What chipset though?
> The O
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:55:55PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the CVS tag shouldn't be interpreted as an entry which contains
> a password.
>
> ---snip---
> Backup passwd and group files:
>
> 1c1
> < # $FreeBSD:(password):09:07 peter Exp $
> ---
> > # $FreeBSD:(password
After upgrading from -STABLE I no longer have a MAKEDEV script in my /dev
I didn't find anything on this in UPDATING, so I suspect I ought to have
one :)
I can't simply cp it from /usr/src/etc/ since cp doesn't seem to like
devfs.
I think I've missed something, so any pointers would be apprecia
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Raphael Korsoski wrote:
GAAAK! Ignore this message, I re-read it an realised how stupid it was.
Naturally, as I wrote, I'm now using devfs, which explains everything
...
>>> I can't simply cp it from /usr/src/etc/ since cp doesn't seem to like
>>> devfs.
> I think I've miss
Hi,
I think the CVS tag shouldn't be interpreted as an entry which contains
a password.
---snip---
Backup passwd and group files:
1c1
< # $FreeBSD:(password):09:07 peter Exp $
---
> # $FreeBSD:(password):27:16 ache Exp $
16a17
> www:(password):80:80::0:0:World Wide Web Owner:/nonexistent:/sbin/
Hello Jörg et al,
# Just for grins, i dug out my old CP/M C compiler. (SuperSoft C, 1983
# vintage) That one's the only one so far i've seen where
#
# #if __STDC__
#
# wouldn't work as expected -- but
#
# #if (__STDC__ - 1) == 0
#
# wouldn't either. Apparently, this compiler substituted a
Hello,
just a question. Has anyone usb-devices working on a current-smp
(very recent current, but problem exists since I can remember)
system? On my Abit VP6 (Via-Chipset) a USB-Mouse and USB-Printer
do work fine if I boot a single-CPU kernel. With a SMP-Kernel
I am getting messages like:
Nov 10
<
said:
> As I understand it, the only problem is if some implementation indicates
> non-conformance with #define __STDC__ 0, which is unheard of to me, and,
> if I were an implementor of such a system, I'd just leave it undefined.
That is a slight misinterpretation of what those systems do.
T
I have a [secondary] USB Keyboard with a mouse port on it's side installed, as well as
a cameramate CompactFlash reader hooked up.
Both work.
Michael Class wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just a question. Has anyone usb-devices working on a current-smp
> (very recent current, but problem exists since I c
In current usbd seems to be broken, it will not handle events if left to
daemonize. Although, if you run usbd as "usbd -d &" it handles events just
fine. What could cause this?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On 08-Nov-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Jim Bryant wrote:
>
>> Is anyone else seeing this problem? I posted a message the other day to
>> this list, and have yet to see a single response.
>>
>> This is from a completely fresh cvsup of everything.
>>
>> buildworld succeeds, but the
I'll give it a try next time I build a kernel. Thanks for the info on the
optimization option info, adding -O was successful in
compiling atomic.c.
John Baldwin wrote:
> On 08-Nov-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Jim Bryant wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Is anyone else seeing this problem? I
[ Followups to -current ]
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Loren James Rittle wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have ported the most recent version of boehm-gc (6.1-alpha) to
> FreeBSD/i386 under the auspice of the gcc project (it will be in Hans'
> 6.1 release and it is on the gcc mainline). I got one notable thi
17 matches
Mail list logo
