> I have installed application software from port collection . How do I
> make un-install ? If I want to upgrade the existing application , how do I
> upgrade them ? Please advise
Please ask this question on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_ FreeBSD Services Limited
I own and MSI 694D Pro MoBo. It's a VIA 694x chip based dual P-III board.
I recently installed a version of 5.0 from March, and it was running fine.
I cvsup'd and rebuilt everything Friday night. When I tried to boot the new
kernel it was panicing on a call to destroy_dev() on device 154/0 which
Sorry here is the attatchment.
Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Oct 29 03:24:52 CST 2001
[EMAIL PROTE
Right, got it. Thanks for the ptr.
-eric
Yonatan Bokovza writes:
> see long and tedious thread in cvs-all with headline of
> Re: Causing known breakage (was: cvs commit:
> src/sys/kern kern_conf.c subr_disk.c)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Eric P Liedtke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 02:06:00PM -, cameron grant wrote:
> > my system with dual 1.1ghz durons identifies as:
> >
> > CPU: AMD Duron(tm) MP Processor (1110.94-MHz 686-class CPU)
> > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x670 Stepping = 0
>
> Wo
"Eric P Liedtke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Warning: devsm() called on 154/0
> Warning: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 154/0
> panic don't do that
Please refer to the first paragraph of section 19.2.1.4 in the
handbook.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mai
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 02:19:16PM +, Eric P Liedtke wrote:
> I own and MSI 694D Pro MoBo. It's a VIA 694x chip based dual P-III board.
> I recently installed a version of 5.0 from March, and it was running fine.
> I cvsup'd and rebuilt everything Friday night. When I tried to boot the new
>
Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Silbersack writes:
> > Oops, error on my part; /proc does need to exist. So, I guess the
> > question is this: Can devfs's error handling in the case of /dev being
> > non-existant be improved?
> Barely, because
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Silbersack
>writes:
>> > Oops, error on my part; /proc does need to exist. So, I guess the
>> > question is this: Can devfs's error handling in the c
On 29-Oct-01 cameron grant wrote:
>> > from what i can see, identcpu.c fetches the cpu name using a cpuid
>> > instruction.
>>
>> The part cpuid gives you is "AuthenticAMD".
>> The fancy name is determined by switching on the Id.
>
>
> read identcpu.c. you are correct for k6 and lesser process
> > from what i can see, identcpu.c fetches the cpu name using a cpuid
> > instruction.
>
> The part cpuid gives you is "AuthenticAMD".
> The fancy name is determined by switching on the Id.
read identcpu.c. you are correct for k6 and lesser processors. the code in
question is around line 323:
11 matches
Mail list logo