In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chad David writes:
>On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:00:16PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like the bug is the md driver cloning "md10ec" which it shouldn't
>> do. This bug must naturally be in md_clone(), but I don't have the
>> minutes right now to hunt
úÄÒÁ×ÓÔ×ÕÊÔÅ, freebsd-current.
--
Best regards,
Vadim Zaychenko
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 92369162
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
íÁÌÏÉÚ×ÅÓÔÎÙÊ ÓÅÄØÍÏÊ ÚÁËÏÎ îØÀÔÏÎÁ: ðÔÉÃÁ × ÒÕËÅ ÂÅÚÏÐÁÓÎÅÊ, ÞÅÍ ÎÁÄ ÇÏÌÏ×ÏÊ.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
ïÔÐÒÁ×ÌÅ
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Harry Starr wrote:
> The problem is the new inclusion of ipfilter stuff.
>
> Make will change directory to .OBJDIR if it exists, and it does NOW that
> there is an ipfilter SUBDIR.
The support for a separate object tree unfortunately gives separate
object directories even to
For small devices (unclear definition of small), the following (changed
from swap to vnode from the mdconfig man page example) is broken:
sproing# dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1024000 count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
1024000 bytes transferred in 0.234674 secs (4363498 bytes/sec)
sproing# mdco
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:23:17 -0400 (EDT), Robert Watson wrote:
>
> For small devices (unclear definition of small), the following (changed
> from swap to vnode from the mdconfig man page example) is broken:
>
> sproing# dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1024000 count=1
> 1+0 records in
> 1+0 records out
Just as a data point, vmware 2.0.4.1142 under 4.4-STABLE as host boots
4.2-4.4-STABLE guest extremely slowly, and freezes at the 'mounting root'
line under 5.0-CURRENT, as of 10/21/2001.
I left it alone for five hours under -CURRENT, no way it would move.
Brad
// -- http://www.BRAD-X.com/ -- //
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> In the non-LRP case, the percentage drop in interrupt overhead
> is ~10% (as has been observed by others). THis makes sense,
> too, if you consider that NETISR driving of receives means
> less time in interrupt processing. If we multiply the 15%
> (1
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 11:58:23AM +1000, Harry Starr wrote:
> It seems to be nigh impossible to build a "previous" release on -current.
>
> Problems include "incomplete" cross tool building, header files, and of
> course, device support, in particular differences
> between the "old" vn stuff, an
> Problems include "incomplete" cross tool building, header files, and
> of course, device support, in particular differences between the
> "old" vn stuff, and the new "md" device.
kris> I build worlds in a jail populated with the target release so there's
kris> no problems with this.
That's tr
- Original Message -
From: "Makoto MATSUSHITA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: RELENG_4 builds on -current
> That's true, maybe he only wanna say about 4-stable "make release"
> with (recent) 5-current box in the latter h
subscribe freebsd-current
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 12:08:17PM +1000, Harry Starr wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Makoto MATSUSHITA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:21 AM
> Subject: Re: RELENG_4 builds on -current
>
>
> > That's true, maybe he only wanna
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Mark Peek wrote:
MP>Yes, it does appear to be due to this commit. The first address on the
MP>interface queue has an address of 0.0.0.0. Here's a patch that works for
MP>me to block the messages. I'm guessing at the correct behavior so use at
MP>your own risk. At least the vo
Doctors,
Lawyers, Business Owners, Home Makers, Students, and More!
What Do ALL These People Have In Common?
They all have been opened up to a NEW way of thinking!
Our organization has helped people from all walks of life earn from 10k to 50k per week/mont
14 matches
Mail list logo
