Hi David
>From sys/i386/include/ansi.h:
(1) #if defined __GNUC__
(2) #if (__GNUC__ > 2 || __GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__ > 95)
(3) #define _BSD_VA_LIST_ __builtin_va_list /* internally known to gcc */
(4) #endif
(5) typedef _BSD_VA_LIST_ __gnuc_va_list; /* compatibility w/GNU
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:53:11AM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> Hi David
>
> >From sys/i386/include/ansi.h:
>
> (1) #if defined __GNUC__
> (2) #if (__GNUC__ > 2 || __GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__ > 95)
> (3) #define _BSD_VA_LIST_ __builtin_va_list /* internally known to gcc */
> (4) #e
On 17-Oct-2001 Peter S. Housel wrote:
> At Wed, 17 Oct 2001 18:32:15 +0900 (JST), Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > Either hack the startup script, or man 5 dhclient.conf :)
> > (Look for medium)
>
> And then use "media" instead, because dhclient.conf(5) is wrong.
Ahh, interesting.
Obviously I hav
hi, there!
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:00:52AM +0200, Jose M. Alcaide wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 12:11:45PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > I've seen this when DHCP fails to allocate an address.
> >
>
> But I am not using DHCP. Maybe there are other machines in the LAN (it is
> a *big*
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Max Khon wrote:
MK>hi, there!
MK>
MK>On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:00:52AM +0200, Jose M. Alcaide wrote:
MK>
MK>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 12:11:45PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
MK>> > I've seen this when DHCP fails to allocate an address.
MK>> >
MK>>
MK>> But I am not using DH
Do you really need kerberos IV and Kerberos5?
M
> ===> libexec/telnetd
> cc -O -pipe -DLINEMODE -DUSE_TERMIO -DDIAGNOSTICS -DOLD_ENVIRON
> -DENV_HACK -DAUTHENTICATION -DENCRYPTION
> -I/usr/src/kerberos5/libexec/telnetd/../../../crypto/telnet -DINET6 -Wall
> -I/usr/src/kerberos5/libexec/telnetd/
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 10:55:25PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Jose M. Alcaide wrote:
> > After rebuilding the kernel two days ago (Oct 15), I am getting lots of
> > messages like these:
> >
> > arp: 00:30:65:de:99:32 is using my IP address 0.0.0.0!
> > arp: 00:0a:27:b0:a7:0
Not really but it seems all the binary snapshots from
current.FreeBSD.ORG and also the release binary distributions all seem to
install /usr/lib/libkrb.* and /usr/lib/libkrb5.*, that I just wanted to
keep them up to date as I found out when libs are older than the rest of
the tree, it can
Mike Silbersack wrote:
> What probably should be done, if you have time, is to add a bit of
> profiling to your patch to find out how it helps most. I'm curious how
> many times it ends up looping, and also why it is looping (whether this is
> due to receive or transmit.) I think knowing this in
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 01:37:29PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > >From sys/i386/include/ansi.h:
> >
> > (1) #if defined __GNUC__
> > (2) #if (__GNUC__ > 2 || __GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__ > 95)
> > (3) #define _BSD_VA_LIST_ __builtin_va_list /* internally known to gcc */
> > (4) #end
After installing the KDE 2.2 port on yesterdays' -current, I ran into the
following problem:
traitor:/usr/src/lib/libpam/libpam# kcheckpass
Password:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/pam_nologin.so: Undefined symbol "login_getclass"
traitor:/usr/src/lib/libpam/libpam#
This thread mentions t
Hi,
The attached patch is to sys/i386/* code. It's basically 50%, albeit the
easy 50%, of the Junior Kernel Hacker task from jhb last month. I
finished it and tested awhile ago (~1 month) but my current box died. My
current box is still dead, so I've yet to test it any further, but Peter
Wemm
Is a real need for ports under -CURRENT to require (from a
week or two, I don't remember) XFree86-libraries?
They asks for XFree86-libraries-4.1.0, but I have 3.3.6_10
installed. Can I (safetly) mix 3.3.6 and 4.1.0?
Is the upgrade from 3.3.6 to 4.1.0 really needed? Planned?
I haven't set XFREE
> Should I file a PR?
No. I have this :-)
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_ FreeBSD Services Limited
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 11:21:52AM -0701, Jos Backus wrote:
> After installing the KDE 2.2 port on yesterdays' -current, I ran into the
> following problem:
>
> traitor:/usr/src/lib/libpam/libpam# kcheckpass
> Password:
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/pam_nologin.so: Undefined symbol "logi
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:02:49PM -0701, Jos Backus wrote:
> Forgot to mention, I had to make kcheckpass setuid root to make kcheckpass
> itself work (just verified this on -stable).
Uh.. that's documented. See ports/x11/kdebase2/Makefile rev 1.77.
--
wca
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 05:07:31PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> Uh.. that's documented. See ports/x11/kdebase2/Makefile rev 1.77.
Really? I just checked 1.77 and I don't see it. Can you tell me what to look
for?
Thanks,
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/Santa Clara, CA
Extracts from dmesg:
atapci0: port 0x1050-0x105f at device 7.1 on pci0
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
...
ad0: 17301MB [35152/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33
acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4
...
acpi_lid0: Lid closed
ata0: resetting devices .. done
ata1: resettin
This one is a bit harder to track down than the ata one, it just happened while
I was sitting in X. It might have been just after resuming, but I can't
exactly remember. Note that like the ata panic, we panic'd trying to sync the
disks (perhaps we shouldn't try to sync the disks on a panic?) and
Hi
I'm just about to upgrade a box to current, (cvsup MAIN, buildworld, kernel,
installworld)
And after reading UPDATING, I've seen a few things, but I don't know if I
have to do them or not because they were old stuffs :
brandelf -t Linux /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig
cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gper
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:15:58PM -0701, Jos Backus wrote:
> Really? I just checked 1.77 and I don't see it. Can you tell me what to look
> for?
Oops.. rev 1.78 in conjunction with pkg-message :)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11/kdebase2/Makefile.diff?r1=1.77&r2=1.78
http://www.fr
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 05:18:27PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> Oops.. rev 1.78 in conjunction with pkg-message :)
Oh yeah :) I would have missed it anyway because I did an unattended bulk
upgrade using portupgrade. Thanks Will.
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/Santa Clara, CA
Le 2001-10-10, Thomas Quinot écrivait :
> > Sep 28 09:47:19 hunter amd[309]: /net: mount: No such file or directory
> > Sep 28 09:47:19 hunter amd[309]: extra mkdirs required for /net
> > Sep 28 09:47:19 hunter amd[309]: amfs_toplvl_mount: mount_amfs_toplvl failed:
>Operation not sup
"Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> > Here are the context diff versions of the coelescing patch.
>
> Ahh, I see. In short (at least for the ti(4) driver), you're running the
> transmit and receive routines until they run without processing any
> packets. So you catch any packets that came into the rec
"Jose M. Alcaide" wrote:
> I found something interesting: these messages are caused by ARP requests
> carrying 0.0.0.0 as the sender IP address. All of them come from Apple
> Macintosh (over 40 different machines). I am not sure whether 0.0.0.0 is a
> legal sender IP address in an ARP request; 0.0
To expand a little...
> That said, it's probably a good idea to never ARP for 0.0.0.0,
> since a "who has" in that case is a really dumb idea, since,
> as weas pointed out, it's intended to mean "this host", in the
> absence of an IP address (i.e. 0.0.0.0 is not an IP address,
> it's a special va
In message Garance A Drosihn writes:
: At 12:43 PM -0700 10/16/01, Brooks Davis wrote:
: >I've been trying to get applix 5.0 to work and I've been running into
: >some interesting problems. The first one was that current has the
: >getresuid syscall and the
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:33:09PM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> Is a real need for ports under -CURRENT to require (from a
> week or two, I don't remember) XFree86-libraries?
>
> They asks for XFree86-libraries-4.1.0, but I have 3.3.6_10
> installed. Can I (safetly) mix 3.3.6 and 4.1.0?
> Is
My Xircom (cardbus) nic is nonfunctional in -current as well, however it
hangs the system when dhclient tries to set it up.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Trent Nelson wrote:
>
> I have a Sharp AR50 laptop. It has an Accton EN2242 MiniPCI 10/100
> NIC that's producing the following:
>
> pci0: at
Has anyone noticed this with a recent build. I tried to make
buildworld from an hour ago and I get
uuencode iso-8859-4_to_cp437.tmp iso-8859-4_to_cp437 >
iso-8859-4_to_cp437.scm
uuencode: not found
*** Error code 127
uuencode: not found
uuencode koi8-r2cp866.tmp koi8-r2cp866 > koi8-r2cp866.scm
crt1.c -o crt1.o
In file included from /usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include/stdlib.h:42,
from /usr/src/lib/csu/alpha/crt1.c:42:
/usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include/machine/ansi.h:79: syntax error before
`__gnuc_va_list'
/usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include/machine/ansi.h:79: warning:
31 matches
Mail list logo