On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 08:43:20PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> I just built today's -current, still having a couple of problems.
> First off, when install tried to rm -R libc_r.so.4 and libc.so.4 it couldn't
> because schg flags were set. Went fine after I removed them.
>
Should be fixed in sr
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 11:13:28AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 08:43:20PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> > I just built today's -current, still having a couple of problems.
> > First off, when install tried to rm -R libc_r.so.4 and libc.so.4 it couldn't
> > because schg
On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 08:43:20PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> > I just built today's -current, still having a couple of problems.
> > First off, when install tried to rm -R libc_r.so.4 and libc.so.4 it couldn't
> > because schg flags were set. Went
>I tried to upgrade my -current system today (I hadn't upgraded for a
>couple of weeks before this), and my PS/2 mouse went undetected.
[...]
>and here's my verbose dmesg from a boot with today's sources:
>
>I notice that my atkbdc gets allocated as:
>
>atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0
Ye
>On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 03:00:08PM -0400, Viren R.Shah wrote:
>> atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0
>> ^
>
>Same here (Asus CUBX mobo):
>
>atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0
Would you do the following and send me dmesg's output in each
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 14:39:43 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> As commit/immediate MFC message says:
>
> Disable per-user .login_conf support due to incorrect merging of local
> and globaly settings. An alternative implementation will be developed.
>
> Reported by:Przemyslaw Frasunek <[
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 15:11:17 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> If you mean his report in BUGTRAQ
>
>http://www.securityfocus.com/cgi-bin/archive.pl?id=1&mid=215381&start=2001-09-19&end=2001-09-25
>
> it is hoax, we don't have such vulnerability in -current as I test.
> Please TEST things be
Thus spake Andrey A. Chernov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Why it is hoax? One reason is simple, look at his examples:
A hoax, that has been tested and verified by 10+ people on IRC, where he originally
reported it.
> Only "me" class can be defined in ~/.login_conf, anything else ignored
> there. And
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 14:12:17 +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
> Thus spake Andrey A. Chernov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Why it is hoax? One reason is simple, look at his examples:
>
> A hoax, that has been tested and verified by 10+ people on IRC, where he originally
> reported it.
Please, re
Thus spake Andrey A. Chernov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Please, read me carefully. This bug not exist in -current, where it is
> disabled by mistake via commit I complain. I not test other branches, I
Err, the bugtraq message explicelty says "4.4". Even worse if it only
exists in the production-bra
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 15:11:07 +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
> Thus spake Andrey A. Chernov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Please, read me carefully. This bug not exist in -current, where it is
> > disabled by mistake via commit I complain. I not test other branches, I
>
> Err, the bugtraq messag
> "Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 18:32:57 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > > After stdio changes 4.4 binaries linked with libtermcap/libcurses refuse
> > > to work:
> > >
> > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libcurses.so: Undefined symbol "__stdout
> p"
> > >
Thus spake Andrey A. Chernov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[Cc: listed trimmed to a value mass]
> Proper move will be MFC -current login_cap variant to other branches, not
> disabling & not testing rush.
If I understood the IRC discussion a week ago correctly, we had a volunteer
who wanted to rewrite t
On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 14:39:43 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > As commit/immediate MFC message says:
> >
> > Disable per-user .login_conf support due to incorrect merging of local
> > and globaly settings. An alternative implementation will
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 13:53:02 -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> is at best unhelpful, and more likely quite harmful. It was verified by a
> number of FreeBSD developers on many of past releases, and on 4.4-RC, as
> well as FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT. The patch was tested on many of those
I test in on m
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 22:42:43 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 13:53:02 -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> > is at best unhelpful, and more likely quite harmful. It was verified by a
> > number of FreeBSD developers on many of past releases, and on 4.4-RC, as
> > well as Fr
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 22:42:43 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 13:53:02 -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> > is at best unhelpful, and more likely quite harmful. It was verified by a
> > number of FreeBSD developers on many of past releases, and on 4.4-RC, as
> > well as Fr
The bug doesn't exist in 4.4 either. It was fixed prior to release.
Doesn't anyone read commit mail anymore?! :-(
- Jordan
> Thus spake Andrey A. Chernov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Please, read me carefully. This bug not exist in -current, where it is
> > disabled by mistake via commit I compl
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 03:17:52PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> Only "me" class can be defined in ~/.login_conf, anything else ignored
> there. And "me" class picked up only when permissions are set to user
> mode, at the end of setusercontext(). And "copyright" and "welcome" are
> not ove
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph Mallett writes:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 03:17:52PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > Only "me" class can be defined in ~/.login_conf, anything else ignored
> > there. And "me" class picked up only when permissions are set to user
> > mode, at the end of
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 05:21:24PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 15:11:07 +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
> > Thus spake Andrey A. Chernov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > > Please, read me carefully. This bug not exist in -current, where it is
> > > disabled by mistake via
On Saturday 22 September 2001 01:28 am, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 12:13:02 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 12:30:30PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 11:13:28 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > > > Second I still have
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 11:13:28 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Second I still have apps looking for libc.so.4 (mountd for example) I finally
> > just linked those libs back from compat and it seems to work. Is this just my
> > box this is happening on or are others also seeing this?
> >
> Hm
23 matches
Mail list logo
