On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 03:06:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:59:22PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Shouldn't the includes/Makefile be installing headers using
> > INCOWN/INCGRP instead of BINOWN/BINGRP? I ran into this when trying
> > to do a 'make includes' as a
I forgot something:
IdlePTD 4734976
initial pcb at 3b5f80
panicstr: mutex sched lock recursed at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:858
panic messages:
---
panic: blockable sleep lock (sx) allproc @
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_proc.c:146
syncing disks... 90 90 panic: mutex sched lock recursed at
/usr/src
I haven't made any mutex commits -- my commits were credential-related.
At least two bugs have popped up and been resolved since the pcred removal
commits, including:
1) Bug in execve() such that saved uids/gids were not being done in some
situations.
2) Bug in crfree() such that there was a
As promised I've made up a list of reports I've received so far go to
http://freebsd.dk/ and follow the link.
I also have a patch for the Yamaha's (yamaha-cdr.p1) which also
can be found via the above URL. Let me know if that make things
work...
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTE
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 03:06:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:59:22PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > Shouldn't the includes/Makefile be installing headers using
> > > INCOWN/INCGRP instead of BINOWN/BINGRP? I ran into this when trying
> > > to do a 'make inclu
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being
> > used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile.
>
> And perhaps one should go read the commit message that introduced them...
> it was
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:26:11AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being
> > > used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile.
> >
> > And perhap
> On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being
> > > used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile.
> >
> > And perhaps one should go read the commit message that introduced them...
Over the last couple of weeks, I've seen wierd statements coming out of
mountd:
On startup:
May 28 10:16:04 farrago mountd[216]: can't delete exports for /
On a mount of /usr/obj:
May 28 10:21:43 farrago mountd[217]: can't delete exports for /tmp
May 28 10:21:43 farrago mountd[217]: can't del
This is on a system (my laptop):
FreeBSD localhost 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #13: Sun May 27 23:44:24 PDT 2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/common/C/obj/usr/src/sys/LAPTOP_30W i386 Mon May 28
07:27:59 PDT 2001
Recent CVSup activity:
CVSup begin from cvsup14.freebsd.org at Sat May 26 03:47:01 P
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Over the last couple of weeks, I've seen wierd statements coming out of
> mountd:
>
> On startup:
>
> May 28 10:16:04 farrago mountd[216]: can't delete exports for /
>
> On a mount of /usr/obj:
>
> May 28 10:21:43 f
If memory serves me right, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:32:09PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> > > +.if !defined(NORELNOTES)
> >
> > Do we really need Yet Another Knob? Why isn't NODOC suffient?
>
> FWIW, I think we should lose N
Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ===> usr.bin/fetch
> /flat/src/usr.bin/fetch/fetch.c: In function `main':
> /flat/src/usr.bin/fetch/fetch.c:757: `vtty' undeclared (first use in this function)
Noticed this in my `make release' attempt yesterday, too.
--
cheers, J"org
On Mon, 28 May 2001 21:45:02 +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> > ===> usr.bin/fetch
>
> > /flat/src/usr.bin/fetch/fetch.c: In function `main':
> > /flat/src/usr.bin/fetch/fetch.c:757: `vtty' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> Noticed this in my `make release' attempt yesterday, too.
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:31:58AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being
> > > > used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile.
> > >
> >
Hi,
I am writing to introduce ePushcart.Net
Our prices on name brand, guaranteed merchandise
consistantly BEAT those on auction sites & at
Discount retail stores!
Please check us out the next time you shop:
http://www.ePushcart.Net
Thanks for considering ePushcart.Net-
"A Diverse Marketplace fo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Polstra writes:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> May 28 10:21:43 farrago mountd[217]: can't delete exports for /tmp
>> May 28 10:21:43 farrago mountd[217]: can't delete exports for /usr/obj
>
>I've been seeing this
> On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:31:58AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > > This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being
> > > > > used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile.
>
>Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 10:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
>From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>This is on a system (my laptop):
>FreeBSD localhost 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #13: Sun May 27 23:44:24 PDT 2001
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/common/C/obj/usr/src/sys/LAPTOP_30W i386 Mon May 28
>07:27:59 P
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> imp 2001/05/28 21:26:44 PDT
>
> Modified files:
> .UPDATING
> Log:
> Looks like -current is safe again, and has been since Friday.
-current is NOT safe, by any stretch of the imagination. Kris K. and I
have both posted numerou
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Doug Barton writes:
: Warner Losh wrote:
: >
: > imp 2001/05/28 21:26:44 PDT
: >
: > Modified files:
: > .UPDATING
: > Log:
: > Looks like -current is safe again, and has been since Friday.
:
: -current is NOT safe, by a
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:16:46PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > .UPDATING
> > Log:
> > Looks like -current is safe again, and has been since Friday.
Alpha is in evern worse shape than x86. The statement that -current is
safe is 110% wrong.
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Hi,
I'm having strange problems with one of local dial-up providers: without
any visible reasons from time to time I can't establish PPP connection
during 20-30 minutes. Shortly after going into `Network' mode ppp(8)
complains about `Unrecognised CBCP packet' and drops down line.
Restarting ppp/m
Yes, this patch fix it for me. I had to convert the spaces back to tabs
though. :-)
John
--
John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If memory serves me right, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > > > *** Filesystem is 1440 K, 66 left
> > > > > *** 4000 bytes/inode,
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
...
> : -current is NOT safe, by any stretch of the imagination. Kris K. and I
> : have both posted numerous messages to -current about the problems we're
> : having let me know if you need copies.
>
> I'm not having problems :-). However, I see tha
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
:Hi,
:
:I'm having strange problems with one of local dial-up providers: without
:any visible reasons from time to time I can't establish PPP connection
:during 20-30 minutes. Shortly after going into `Network' mode ppp(8)
:complains about `Unrecognised C
26 matches
Mail list logo
