Re: PAMmed su still broken for passwordless accounts

2001-04-28 Thread Mark Murray
> > 1) su on passwordless accounts. > >(a) `su ' now bogusly prompts for a password. It lets > >you in if you type an empty password. > >(b) `echo somecommand | su ' now bogusly prompts for > >a password. su doesn't find a password, and exits without printing > >a

Re: cp -u patch

2001-04-28 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
-On [20010426 23:27], Matt Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >There is a whole lot more to doing an efficient copy then simply checking >the mtime. It's silly to try to integrate it into 'cp'. Use cpdup >instead. plug plug plug. That's missing the point. This is for script compati

Re: PAMmed su still broken for passwordless accounts

2001-04-28 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Mark Murray wrote: > > > 1) su on passwordless accounts. > > >(a) `su ' now bogusly prompts for a password. It lets > > >you in if you type an empty password. (a1) It also lets you in if you type garbage followed by a newline. > > >(b) `echo somec

Re: PAMmed su still broken for passwordless accounts

2001-04-28 Thread Mark Murray
> > Feature, not bug. PAM has been told to use "unix" authentication. > > The bug turns out to be that PAM shouldn't have been told this. The > non-PAM case uses the following check to avoid checking for passwords > on passwordless accounts: > --- > /* if target requires a password

No Subject

2001-04-28 Thread Salvo Bartolotta
> OK, I;ve looked and looked and can't seem to figure out how to set hw.ata.wc to enabled. I've put and a few other things in /etc/sysctl.conf, the others get set, hw.ata.wc doesn't. You can't change it by hand either as sysctl tells you it's readonly. Grepping in /sys/i386/conf has turned up noth

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-28 Thread Salvo Bartolotta
[ resending, with a subject ] > OK, I;ve looked and looked and can't seem to figure out how to set hw.ata.wc to enabled. I've put and a few other things in /etc/sysctl.conf, the others get set, hw.ata.wc doesn't. You can't change it by hand either as sysctl tells you it's readonly. Grepping in /s

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-28 Thread Peter Wemm
Erick Kinnee wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 09:24:40AM -0500, Erick Kinnee wrote: > > No flames please, I feel I have tried to find the answer. :) > > Ok, I do deserve a flame it seems. I totally missed man ata. The > loader.conf manpage does state that there are 4 sysctl knobs tuneable > from

camcontrol stop / restart broken

2001-04-28 Thread Tomi Vainio - Sun Finland -
Hi, My source disk is quite noisy so normally I stop it after building the world and restart it once a week. Couple weeks this restart hasn't worked as before. Only way to start disk again is reboot. camcontrol stop 1:2:0 Unit stopped successfully mount /f mount: /dev/da1s1e: Input/output er

CVSup snapshot 16.1a is now available

2001-04-28 Thread John Polstra
Some of you who use CVSup might wish to consider upgrading to the new snapshot, called version 16.1a. It contains fixes for a number of bugs, including ... ... the one that sometimes caused CVSup to delete the symbolic link to your ports tree and replace it with a new copy of the tree. For th

ipfw: several equal rules under same number bug

2001-04-28 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
How it can be possible? ipfw -a l: 07001 401680 deny tcp from any to any 7006 070010 0 deny tcp from any to any 7006 070010 0 deny tcp from any to any 7006 I use equal "ipfw add" several times from the script, but the rule number was the same all

Re: ipfw: several equal rules under same number bug

2001-04-28 Thread Rich Wales
Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > I use equal "ipfw add" several times from the script, but > the rule number was the same all times. I expect that rule > is replaced, not added with same number several times. No. There can be multiple rules with the same number. If you run multiple "ipfw

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-28 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Cejka Rudolf wrote: > > > Right now, I have upgraded my -current machine from > > February 13 to April 26. > > > > I were pleased with change to dir allocation in FFS, > > but here are my unpleasant test results (UDMA33, partition >

Re: ipfw: several equal rules under same number bug

2001-04-28 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 20:21:36 -0700, Rich Wales wrote: > Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > > I use equal "ipfw add" several times from the script, but > > the rule number was the same all times. I expect that rule > > is replaced, not added with same number several times. > > No. Ther

Re: ipfw: several equal rules under same number bug

2001-04-28 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 08:11:32 +0400 >From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I think it is very contr-intuitive way, better action will be "replace" if >number is the same. We have _enough_ numbers to not compact rules in such >bad manner. >For example "ipfw delete" takes number as an

Re: camcontrol stop / restart broken

2001-04-28 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 23:09:07 +0300, Tomi Vainio - Sun Finland - wrote: > Hi, > > My source disk is quite noisy so normally I stop it after building the > world and restart it once a week. Couple weeks this restart hasn't > worked as before. Only way to start disk again is reboot. > > cam

Re: ipfw: several equal rules under same number bug

2001-04-28 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 21:22:59 -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > I have at least one application where I generate ipfw rules in a script, > for a set of subnets which I read from a file at execution time. I am > able to use the numbers to group the firewall rules , so that for any > given subnet,

Re: ipfw: several equal rules under same number bug

2001-04-28 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 08:42:20 +0400 >From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 21:22:59 -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: >> I have at least one application where I generate ipfw rules in a script, >> for a set of subnets which I read from a file at execution time. I