On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:24:14PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 March 2001 at 23:48:10 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Greg Lehey wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> >>> The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
On Monday, 26 March 2001 at 18:19:06 +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:24:14PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Sunday, 25 March 2001 at 23:48:10 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> Greg Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:46:22AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 23:11:56 +, Brian Somers wrote:
> > > > > 1. Ppp is in -auto mode (or a ``set mode auto'' has been done).
> > > > >Here, ppp configures the interface as soon as it sees the ``set
> > > > >
I sent a patch request:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25730
--
Falco KrepelPhone: +49-(0)30 - 34 63 - 7 276
GMD-FOKUS Fax:+49-(0)30 - 34 63 - 8 276
Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 31 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10589 Berlin
I have sent a patch request:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25730
--
Falco KrepelPhone: +49-(0)30 - 34 63 - 7 276
GMD-FOKUS Fax:+49-(0)30 - 34 63 - 8 276
Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 31 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10589 Berlin
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
> : This looks OK, though you might want to disable the pccard support, since
> : it's known to be broken right now.
>
> pccard support is not broken right now. If there's a "known" issue, I
> sure don't know about it.
Oh, sorry, I'm obviousl
> Hi.
>
> I have diskless-PC which was used /boot/pxeboot. But latest
> FreeBSD-current is output below messages and some fsck_nfs problem.
>
> WARNING: MFS is being phased out in preference for md devices
> WARNING: Please see mdconfig(8) for details
> WARNING: Continuing in 15 seconds
>
>
Hello Jim,
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 07:20:04PM -0500, Jim Bloom wrote:
> I get a slightly different backtrace, but was able to use my palm pilot as the
> serial console. I have had this same problem for quit a while (about a month).
> I suspect a locking issue related to Seigo Tanimura's commit o
Hi!
The syntax for declaring manual pages has been changed.
The manual pages to be installed can now be listed in a
single MAN variable. The old MAN[1-9] syntax is still
supported, for backwards compatibility.
The plan is to MFC this feature after 4.3 release, and
start the deorbit sequence fo
This is a fine solution. I hope it's OK when I add this to my patch
request.
But I have two remarks.
1. For example you could use the diskless boot procedure for smart
clients with a small disk used as swap space. So I think it is better to
use swap instead of malloc for var,dev, and tmp. This c
Dear FreeBSD'ers
with sources as of today, ~ 15:40 GMT (from the dutch mirror), my buildworld
dies thus:
===> sbin/adjkerntz^M
cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c
/usr/src/sbin/adj
kerntz/adjkerntz.c^M
cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall -I/usr/obj/usr
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The syntax for declaring manual pages has been changed.
>
> The manual pages to be installed can now be listed in a
> single MAN variable. The old MAN[1-9] syntax is still
> supported, for backwards compatibility.
>
> Th
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:28:09PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > The syntax for declaring manual pages has been changed.
> >
> > The manual pages to be installed can now be listed in a
> > single MAN variable. The o
gee - being like SysV is more comprehensible than worrying about IPv6
-mo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 04:46:45PM -0500, Mike O'Dell wrote:
>
> gee - being like SysV is more comprehensible than worrying about IPv6
Perhaps if you're living in 1994 :-)
Kris
PGP signature
It's been a couple of days since you sent this e-mail -- did this change
get MFC'd as yet, or are we still waiting for approval? Just want to make
sure it gets in before the release.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Ne
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter Pentchev writes:
: > I welcome the changes, but don't think the old version should be
: > removed: third party software uses it, and it would not serve any
: > purpose to break them.
:
: I'm definitely with Kris on this one; and I know of at least two other
:
Ok. Friday I sat down and tried to make the -m option to ypbind work
correctly using the new TI-RPC code. Unfortunately, my test machine
chose that day to eat itself. Even more unfortunately, it was an AMD
900Mhz Thunderbird. Today, I started working on another box and managed
to get things to wor
I finally tracked down the page fault I was seeing while probing the mpu.
The mutex was not being initialized before it was used. I have included a
patch below which fixes the problem. Will someone please review the style
and commit the fix.
Thanks.
Jim Bloom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: mpu.c
=
* Bill Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010326 16:05] wrote:
> Ok. Friday I sat down and tried to make the -m option to ypbind work
> correctly using the new TI-RPC code. Unfortunately, my test machine
> chose that day to eat itself. Even more unfortunately, it was an AMD
> 900Mhz Thunderbird. Today, I s
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010326 19:57] wrote:
> * Bill Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010326 16:05] wrote:
>
> Why can't you just enable sigio on the reply socket, send all the
> requests with a 0 timeout and then wait for a signal to either
> interrupt the sending or to notify you when
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Stephen McKay wrote:
> >unfortunatly my provider
> >cut me off and I just got some access back, but not for the location
> >the ctm machine is located at.
> >
> >At this time I do not know yet when it will have access again.
>
> Surely FreeBSD Inc (or whatever it is that own
Making fixit floppy.
disklabel: ioctl DIOCWLABEL: Operation not supported by device
Warning: Block size restricts cylinders per group to 6.
Warning: 1216 sector(s) in last cylinder unallocated
/dev/md0c: 2880 sectors in 1 cylinders of 1 tracks, 4096 sectors
1.4MB in 1 cyl groups (6 c/
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:26:34AM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Stephen McKay wrote:
>
> > >unfortunatly my provider
> > >cut me off and I just got some access back, but not for the location
> > >the ctm machine is located at.
> > >
> > >At this time I do not know yet when it
> >
> > Why can't you just enable sigio on the reply socket, send all the
> > requests with a 0 timeout and then wait for a signal to either
> > interrupt the sending or to notify you when you complete sending?
> >
> > Your solution seems awfully complex for what seems to be a simple
> > problem
I won't repeat the commit message here, but the new CAM error recovery code
has been committed to -current.
Note that error printouts are now a little more descriptive, so don't be
alarmed at that.
If there are any problems with the new code, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], or to [EMAIL PROTECT
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes:
: > Play the ball, not the man.
:
: I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And
: "because System V does it this way" has never been a good answer for
: us. And no, I'm not picking on Doug, just making a point.
I see no reas
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
: The problem that Johny was seeing was that 'device pccard' causes broken
: interrupt delivery for cardbus cards. If that's meant to work, I can see
: if I can reproduce it locally.
It is ment to work and works for me on my VAIO all the time.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Falco Krepel writes:
: 1. For example you could use the diskless boot procedure for smart
: clients with a small disk used as swap space. So I think it is better to
: use swap instead of malloc for var,dev, and tmp. This could be done with
: a variable (e.g. diskless
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
WL>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Falco Krepel writes:
WL>: 1. For example you could use the diskless boot procedure for smart
WL>: clients with a small disk used as swap space. So I think it is better to
WL>: use swap instead of malloc for var,dev, and tmp
30 matches
Mail list logo
