Leif Neland wrote:
>
> Bug or pilot error?
>
> My network is 192.168.5.0
>
> I used to have im my /etc/exports:
>
> /var -alldirs -maproot=root: -network 192.168.5 -mask 255.255.255.0
>
> But after the portmapper change, I couldn't mount, was getting permission
> denied.
>
> showmount -e sho
>From a pure logic point of view here's something that might help you
understand it
the 4 octets are broken down into binary and then combined without the
decimal point.
when whatever libraries are doing this, the first octec(192) is converted to
binary. Then there is probably some sort of if s
-On [20010325 09:45], Leif Neland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>/var -alldirs -maproot=root: -network 192.168.5 -mask 255.255.255.0
>
>But after the portmapper change, I couldn't mount, was getting permission
>denied.
>
>showmount -e showed 192.168.5 was being interpreted as
Hi guys,
ok, sources cvsupped yesterday afternoon, just before my ffs_alloc.c
commit [which I did, obviously, add myself locally].
Box had been running for a while when all of a sudden it got into a
panic:
vm_page_alloc: free/cache page 0xc0776fa4 was dirty
a trace in ddb shows:
allocbuf()
ge
It seems Benjamin Close wrote:
> Hi All,
> Is anyone looking at supporting the Intel ICH2-M IDE controller?
Yes.
> This controller is basically the same as the ICH2 controller except it has
> extra powermanagment features as it's the for portable computers (hence
> the M=mobile). I'm curre
On Sunday 25 March 2001 00:11, Marc van Woerkom wrote:
> > >Ok, I did an ediff against NOTES. Perhaps it was the "1" argument to
> > >
> > >device loop1 #Network loopback device
> > >
> > >that was missing. I'll try again.
> >
> > Hmmm Seems odd. If you get a re
> i4b is an ethernet interface, how do you think PPP/HDLC works ? The
> interface is registered with the networking stack, just like a "real"
> networking card is. This make the ether device mandatory.
Hi Gary!
I simply lack knowledge of how network devices are organized.
It might have been pos
On Sunday 25 March 2001 13:53, Marc van Woerkom wrote:
> > i4b is an ethernet interface, how do you think PPP/HDLC works ? The
> > interface is registered with the networking stack, just like a "real"
> > networking card is. This make the ether device mandatory.
>
> Hi Gary!
>
> I simply lack know
> > showmount -e showed 192.168.5 was being interpreted as 192.168.0.5
>
> This is the correct interpretation.
>
> >
> > Changing -network to 192.168.5.0 fixed it, naturally, but the 192.168.5
> > used to work.
>
> It was broken, then. :-)
>
So an unlisted bug was fixed :-)
Leif
To Unsubscrib
Leif Neland wrote:
>
> > > showmount -e showed 192.168.5 was being interpreted as 192.168.0.5
> >
> > This is the correct interpretation.
> >
> > >
> > > Changing -network to 192.168.5.0 fixed it, naturally, but the 192.168.5
> > > used to work.
> >
> > It was broken, then. :-)
> >
> So an unlist
> > /var -alldirs -maproot=root: -network 192.168.5 -mask 255.255.255.0
> > showmount -e showed 192.168.5 was being interpreted as 192.168.0.5
> This is the correct interpretation.
> > Changing -network to 192.168.5.0 fixed it, naturally, but the 192.168.5
> > used to work.
> It was broken, then.
My kernel compiled from -current sources as of today morning hangs after
recognizing the sound hardware, the last line display is:
pcm0: at port
0x240-0x24f,0xe80-0xe87,0x388-0x38f,0x300-0x301,0x100-0x101 irq 7 drq 0,1 on isa0
Ctrl-Alt-Esc does not work. I'll be compiling a kernel with the lat
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 11:20:17 +0200
From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kirk McKusick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Saab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Soeren Schmidt <[EM
i cd rom is locked
what can I do
instead trying cd until unlocked
is there any command to do ?
Its always been working in the correct way for stable and currently is right
now.
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Leif Neland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: /etc/exports: 192.168.5 = 192
Hello folks,
I have tried it with today's -CURRENT, and as soon as I try to boot a
kernel with the options (this has occured also earlier but wanted to make
sure that I try today's sources first)
device midi
device seq
(my sound card is a ISAPnP SB 64 AWE)
I use device sbc too.
the kernel st
Bikeshed time ! :-)
- Original Message -
From: "Valentin Nechayev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: /etc/exports: 192.168.5 = 192.168.0.5
> > > /var -alldirs -maproot=root: -network 192.168.5 -mask 255.255.255.0
> > > showmou
> 192.168.5 should be interpreted as 192.168.0.5 in host address context,
> but as 192.168.5.0 in network address context. (Such network address
> context is well seen in sentences such as "10/8", "192.168/16".)
The only problem I see with 10/8 is that when broken down into binary they
do not matc
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Blaz Zupan wrote:
> My kernel compiled from -current sources as of today morning hangs after
> recognizing the sound hardware, the last line display is:
>
> pcm0: at port
> 0x240-0x24f,0xe80-0xe87,0x388-0x38f,0x300-0x301,0x100-0x101 irq 7 drq
> 0,1 on isa0
Included patch s
> Included patch should fix this problem.
It does, indeed. Thanks!
Blaz Zupan, Medinet d.o.o, Linhartova 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tel: +386-2-320-6320, Fax: +386-2-320-6325
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the bo
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 04:08:47PM +0300, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
> 192.168.5 should be interpreted as 192.168.0.5 in host address context,
> but as 192.168.5.0 in network address context. (Such network address
> context is well seen in sentences such as "10/8", "192.168/16".)
Where is this docu
: Hi guys,
:
: ok, sources cvsupped yesterday afternoon, just before my ffs_alloc.c
: commit [which I did, obviously, add myself locally].
:
: Box had been running for a while when all of a sudden it got into a
: panic:
:
: vm_page_alloc: free/cache page 0xc0776
"David O'Brien" wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 04:08:47PM +0300, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
> > 192.168.5 should be interpreted as 192.168.0.5 in host address context,
> > but as 192.168.5.0 in network address context. (Such network address
> > context is well seen in sentences such as "10/8", "19
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Johny Mattsson (EPA)" writes:
: The xl driver spits out numerous "xl0: watchdog timeout", and I get pings
: around the one second mark, even to machines on the same switch. Trying to
: maintain TCP sessions without keeping a running ping in the background is
: futi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
: This looks OK, though you might want to disable the pccard support, since
: it's known to be broken right now.
pccard support is not broken right now. If there's a "known" issue, I
sure don't know about it.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Johny Mattsson (EPA)" writes:
: I also removed the "device pccard" config option, and as a result
: lost support for the modem card, but in return this fixed the
: watchdog timeouts, and the lan card works quite well now.
: I guess I'll have to keep a backup kernel
On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
Why?
Greg
--
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
* Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010325 15:33] wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
>
> Why?
We've upgraded to Sun's TIRPC code, this includes rpcbind as a replacement
for portmapper.
I get a slightly different backtrace, but was able to use my palm pilot as the
serial console. I have had this same problem for quit a while (about a month).
I suspect a locking issue related to Seigo Tanimura's commit on Feb 25. My last
cvsup was within the past 24 hours and the kernel was buil
Hi.
I have diskless-PC which was used /boot/pxeboot. But latest
FreeBSD-current is output below messages and some fsck_nfs problem.
WARNING: MFS is being phased out in preference for md devices
WARNING: Please see mdconfig(8) for details
WARNING: Continuing in 15 seconds
Does someone alrea
The vmware vmmon driver used to use si_drv1 but suddenly it appears to
have already been used (at least it is no-longer non-zero).
It would fail to open because it checks it before using it during open.
Changing the driver to use si_drv2 fixes the problem.
Since drv1 is defined as 'for the use
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes:
>
>The vmware vmmon driver used to use si_drv1 but suddenly it appears to
>have already been used (at least it is no-longer non-zero).
>It would fail to open because it checks it before using it during open.
>Changing the driver to use si_drv
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes:
> >
> >The vmware vmmon driver used to use si_drv1 but suddenly it appears to
> >have already been used (at least it is no-longer non-zero).
> >It would fail to open because it checks it before using it during op
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes:
>> >
>> >The vmware vmmon driver used to use si_drv1 but suddenly it appears to
>> >have already been used (at least it is no-longer non-zero).
>> >It wo
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:46:22AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 23:11:56 +, Brian Somers wrote:
> > > > 1. Ppp is in -auto mode (or a ``set mode auto'' has been done).
> > > >Here, ppp configures the interface as soon as it sees the ``set
> > > >ifaddr''
Greg Lehey wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
>
> Why?
So we can be more like sysV
--
Perhaps the greatest damage the American system of education has done
to it
On Sunday, 25 March 2001 at 23:48:10 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
>>> The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
>>
>> Why?
>
> So we can be more like sysV
This is good?
Greg
38 matches
Mail list logo
