Are there any issues/plans to let users enable softupdates from inside of
sysinstall ? Softupdates are already enabled in the GENERIC kernel, but to
turn them on you have to run tunefs with the filesystem unmounted. Too
often I find myself doing an onsite install then doing all my customization
I've got two machines, called say master and slave.
Master got the sources, and I do a cvsup and make world almost every
night.
Occationally (once a month or so, when current is in a not too bad shape)
I mount master:/usr/src and master:/usr/obj on slave, and do an
installworld.
Now it fails in
PLIS ERRATA
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I found all of the knobs that turn off harvesting, and with those off, my
alpha 4100 boots again w/o hanging.
So- there are knobs (but nothing in UPDATING warned me to turn them off in
order to boot again). I still think this should be in a separate rc file, but
no matter.
The item that causes
I am trying to make the port p5-Net-SSLeay-1.05 (as a dependency for
webmin). The make stops and askes for the location of OpenSSL. A 'where
openssl' results in '/usr/bin/openssl'. The SSLeay build will not accept
/usr/bin, /usr/bin/, or /usr/bin/openssl . It always reponds with :
"Could not find
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010310 10:26] wrote:
> I am trying to make the port p5-Net-SSLeay-1.05 (as a dependency for
> webmin). The make stops and askes for the location of OpenSSL. A 'where
> openssl' results in '/usr/bin/openssl'. The SSLeay build will not accept
> /usr/bin, /usr
From: James FitzGibbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sysinstall option for softupdates
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 04:19:51 -0500
> Are there any issues/plans to let users enable softupdates from inside of
> sysinstall ?
No "plans", but it's certainly something which could be done.
> If this is a goo
On 9 Mar 2001, Yahoo!Groups wrote:
> We are unable to process the message from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
I used my "contacts" to "fix" this list. Don't worry about it.
Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.FreeBSD.org
To
* Jordan Hubbard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010310 14:52]:
> H. OK, you intrigued me enough by this that I just went ahead and
> did it in -current. :) Let me know what you think, come tomorrow's
> snapshot.
And that, in a nutshell, is why I love FreeBSD
I've got a box that is in desperate n
No. I will try this right now. I still fail to see why the port
would not find the thing. A simple 'where' statement does the trick...
I any case, thanks for the help
JAn
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010310 10:26] wrote:
> > I am tryin
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 11:51:54AM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> I think this is really the only place to do it, just to ease
> confusion. You also wouldn't need to put superblock-frobbing code
> into sysinstall, just bundle tunefs into the mfsroot.
Why not add the softupdates option to newfs?
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why not add the softupdates option to newfs? Since newfs contains every
> tunefs option other than softupdates, I consider it a bug that newfs
> didn't gain that functionality when it was added to tunefs.
I wrote a patch to do this some time back. S
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 01:39:58PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > Erm, just so you know. The 4100 here at WC doesn't even make it past
> > the SCSI probe due to interrupt issues.
>
> Hmm. Well, it *was* working a couple of days ago :-)
Uh, actually _your_ 4100 is the only I've ever known to
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 01:39:58PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > > Erm, just so you know. The 4100 here at WC doesn't even make it past
> > > the SCSI probe due to interrupt issues.
> >
> > Hmm. Well, it *was* working a couple of days ago :-)
>
> Uh, actually _your_ 4100 is the only I
Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The item that causes the alpha to hang on boot is interrupt harvesting. Has
> anyone else running non-ia32 run into problems?
If you're running the "old" harvesting code (pre-Rijndael, i.e. older
than about a day or so), it's seriously broken - it doesn
On 11 Mar 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The item that causes the alpha to hang on boot is interrupt harvesting. Has
> > anyone else running non-ia32 run into problems?
>
> If you're running the "old" harvesting code (pre-Rijndael, i.e. older
> t
(top of tree within the last day or so):
Things seem *almost* okay, but:
nellie.feral.com > root vinum
vinum -> stripe -v /dev/da3a /dev/da4a /dev/da5a /dev/da6a /dev/da7a /dev/da8a
/dev/da9a /dev/da10a /dev/da11a /dev/da12a
drive vinumdrive0 device /dev/da3a
drive vinumdrive1 device /dev/da4a
On Saturday, 10 March 2001 at 17:12:42 -0800, Matt Jacob wrote:
> (top of tree within the last day or so):
>
> Things seem *almost* okay, but:
>
> nellie.feral.com > root vinum
> vinum -> stripe -v /dev/da3a /dev/da4a /dev/da5a /dev/da6a /dev/da7a /dev/da8a
> /dev/da9a /dev/da10a /dev/da11a /dev/
From: "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: sysinstall option for softupdates
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:43:52 -0800
> Why not add the softupdates option to newfs? Since newfs contains every
> tunefs option other than softupdates, I consider it a bug that newfs
> didn't gain that funct
Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> From: "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: sysinstall option for softupdates
> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:43:52 -0800
>
> > Why not add the softupdates option to newfs? Since newfs contains every
> > tunefs option other than softupdates, I consider it a bug t
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 09:06:20PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> I seem to recall Paul Saab has a set for both -current and -stable.
Someone else also just posted a URL to a set of patches.
Is Paul going to commit his, or can I take this on and commit the ones
posted?
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTE
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 09:06:20PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > I seem to recall Paul Saab has a set for both -current and -stable.
>
> Someone else also just posted a URL to a set of patches.
> Is Paul going to commit his, or can I take this on and c
Dima Dorfman wrote:
> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 09:06:20PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > > I seem to recall Paul Saab has a set for both -current and -stable.
> >
> > Someone else also just posted a URL to a set of patches.
> > Is Paul going to commit
Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The version of the patch for -current uses the softdep mount option only.
> If you remove the mount option, you dont get softupdates.
In this case, it might be better to just turn it on by default and let
those who don't want it somewhere use "nosoftdep";
At 11:51 AM -0800 3/10/01, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>H. OK, you intrigued me enough by this that I just went
>ahead and did it in -current. :) Let me know what you think,
>come tomorrow's snapshot.
Ooo. Might this be MFC-able before 4.3 goes out the door?
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 09:51:46PM -0800, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> Are you talking about se's patches to make softdep a mount option,
yes
> The former isn't something you can just drop in. You'd have to decide
> if softdep should be the default.
It defaults to what tunefs sets it to -- POLA.
>
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Saturday, 10 March 2001 at 17:12:42 -0800, Matt Jacob wrote:
> > (top of tree within the last day or so):
> >
> > Things seem *almost* okay, but:
> >
> > nellie.feral.com > root vinum
> > vinum -> stripe -v /dev/da3a /dev/da4a /dev/da5a /dev/da6a /de
27 matches
Mail list logo
