e-publisher's Weekly : ISSUE # 4
===
kdhbooks - February 14, 2001
e-book publishing & marketing
http://www.kdhbooks.com
=
Leif Neland wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:23:35PM -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:56:11AM +0100, Leif Neland scribbled:
> > > | It seems pkg_update is only usable when installing from packages, not from
> > > | ports.
> > >
> > > Because it is a package upd
"Pierre Y. Dampure" wrote:
>
> Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > I used to use a Linksys Etherfast card
> > in my Inspiron, but I haven't used it for
> > a while. Today I tried to use it again
> > but it failed miserably..
> >
>
> Most probably you noticed this already, but (in src/UPDATING):
>
> 2
Greetings !
What are the minimal conditions required for 5.0-Current to recognize my
SCSI card, an Adaptec 1542CP ?
It is seen by the eeprom at bootup but there is nothing in dmesg and the
tape drive and CDRW are unavailable, of course.
Apparently I am missing the SCSI driver.
But just CVSupin
Hi All,
I'm trying to write a simple perl program to create a .db file, insert
some values and delete some. The problem I have is that everything happy
during inserting but when I try to remove all key-value pairs sequently
from the .db file my program crashes. I've tested it in FreeBSD-2.8,
Free
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:10:14PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
> The problem is that 'make install' in a port doesn't check dependencies
> properly, whereas pkg_install does.
Uh, actually, 'make install' does a better job. pkg_install has no
clue about substitute dependencies.
--
wca
To Unsu
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 10:54:26PM -0500, Courtney Thomas wrote:
> Greetings !
>
> What are the minimal conditions required for 5.0-Current to recognize my
> SCSI card, an Adaptec 1542CP ?
Adding the relevant driver to your kernel config, or writing a driver
if one doesn't exist :-)
Kris
PGP
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:10:14PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
> Leif Neland wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:23:35PM -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:56:11AM +0100, Leif Neland scribbled:
> > > > | It seems pkg_update is only usable when installing from
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:10:14PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
> > Leif Neland wrote:
> > The problem is that 'make install' in a port doesn't check dependencies
> > properly, whereas pkg_install does.
>
> Is this really true? There are even bsd.port.mk targets you can
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Courtney Thomas writes:
: What are the minimal conditions required for 5.0-Current to recognize my
: SCSI card, an Adaptec 1542CP ?
I've not tried my aha cards on -current in a while. Maybe it is a
hints related thing?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kris Kennaway writes:
: > What are the minimal conditions required for 5.0-Current to recognize my
: > SCSI card, an Adaptec 1542CP ?
:
: Adding the relevant driver to your kernel config, or writing a driver
: if one doesn't exist :-)
The aha driver supports the 15
Will Andrews wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:10:14PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
> > The problem is that 'make install' in a port doesn't check dependencies
> > properly, whereas pkg_install does.
>
> Uh, actually, 'make install' does a better job. pkg_install has no
> clue about substitu
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On 12 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> > Jake Burkholder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > As I mentioned in the commit message, this changes the size and layout
> > > of struct kinfo_proc, so you'll have to recompile libkvm-using programs.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On 12 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> > Jake Burkholder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > As I mentioned in the commit message, this changes the size and layout
> > > of struct kinfo_proc, so you'll have to recompile libkvm-using programs.
> sysctl is designed for numerical or binary data return
> procfs (or any synthetic fs) is designed for text based data return
> The trouble here that I see is that people are inventing overly-complex
> methods of representing the data when they could just export it in
> text format.
what is so
OK. I upgraded my current box last night. I found a major problem in
Peter's fixes.
The problem has to do with other shared libraries.
We generate new shared libraries (say libcam.so.2) that have the
dependency on __stderr and therefore libc.so.5.20010213. However, old
binaries still link ag
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> *sigh* now, if we had per-file open vnode[1] support, I could quite
> happily solve this by fixing procfs, but people view procfs as bad for
> some reason.
>
> [1] Ignore my vagueness in terms here - the general request is to have
> some form of s
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 23:24 +, Pierre Y. Dampure wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > I used to use a Linksys Etherfast card
> > in my Inspiron, but I haven't used it for
> > a while. Today I tried to use it again
> > but it failed miserably..
> >
>
> Most probably you noticed this alread
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 00:47 +, Paul Richards wrote:
>
> To be honest, DLLs are better than our scheme from that
> perspective. While you might screw a load of applications by
> upgrading a DLL with the same name you can at least look at the
> version number in the properties to find out wh
Hi,
has someone a pam_ssh.c which also adds the dsa key in a session?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Weird enough for government work.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
To Un
Local package initialization:/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:
/usr/lib/libgmp.so.3: Undefined symbol "__stdin"
Later
Mark Hittinger
Earthlink
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark Hittinger writes:
: Local package initialization:/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:
: /usr/lib/libgmp.so.3: Undefined symbol "__stdin"
Yes. This is because we need to bump the major version of many
libraries. I have a patch that is compiling now. I have to bui
Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major
library versions.
http://people.freebsd.org/~imp/Pmaj
it bumps all the major numbrs of all the impacted libraries that I
could find on my system.
Please review this patch as I'd like to commit it soon. Also, I'm not
100
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 10:19:24PM +0100, Pierre DAVID wrote:
> I just upgraded my Dell Latitude LT from 4.2-RELEASE TO
> -current (just before 9h Feb): all is working perfectly
> with a GENERIC kernel, pccardd and a 3Com 3C589 Ethernet
> card.
I hope you are aware that -CURRENT is experimental a
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
> Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major
> library versions.
> http://people.freebsd.org/~imp/Pmaj
> it bumps all the major numbrs of all the impacted libraries that I
> could find on my system.
Please enclose small (< 100
I'm trying to port an Alpha video driver (TGA) from -stable to
-current and have run into a problem converting some calls to
pci_cfgread() and pci_cfgwrite().
The Alpha firmware reports the location of the console video card as a
physical hose, bus type, bus, slot value. In -stable, the card can
Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will Andrews wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:10:14PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
> > > The problem is that 'make install' in a port doesn't check dependencies
> > > properly, whereas pkg_install does.
> > Uh, actually, 'make install' does a better
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bruce Evans
writes:
: Please enclose small (< 100K) patches in the mail if you want them
: reviewed. They would have to be quoted to be reviewed...
OK. See attached. It seems to work for me.
: I think the impacted libraries can be found by compiling them with a
In message <01021422425001.00537@zoomer> "Danny J. Zerkel" writes:
: Is this going to cause any trouble down the road when the vendor bumps
: this? Do we need numeric compatibility? I'm just wondering, since the
: vendor's Makefile specifically says:
:
: VERSION = 2.10.0
: INTERFACE = 3
Vendor
[[ see end of message for major downer ]]
In message <01021423431802.00537@zoomer> "Danny J. Zerkel" writes:
: These lines come from Makefile.in in the vendor's source.
So are you saying it should be 3.1 instead so that the vendor can come
out with 4 later? It must be different than 3.
: But,
> Please review this patch as I'd like to commit it soon. Also, I'm not
> 100% sure what to do about libdes.so.3, so if you have commments on
> that please let me know. Other than that, the patches should be close
> to commitable.
Now is the time to toss that into compat/
M
--
Mark Murray
W
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:45:57PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major
> library versions.
I haven't tried to build -current for a few days now. Can you summerize
what breakage you are seeing?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTE
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:45:57PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
: > Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major
: > library versions.
:
: I haven't tried to build -current for a few days now. Can you summerize
: what br
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:32:33AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
> : On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:45:57PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> : > Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major
> : > library versions.
> :
> : I haven't
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: I'm not happy about bumping every shared lib. Can you answer:
Nor am I.
: (1) does a ``make world'' will not work? Peter showed that we had no
: choice with libc due to the use of the host's existing install programs.
make world works.
35 matches
Mail list logo
