I'm missing the ithread processes for irq10 and irq15.
As you can see in the dmesg output there are de devices that
are using the irqs in question.
I asume that they are only missing in the list as the devices are
working fine.
PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND
0 ?? DLs0:00.16 (swapper
cc -O -pipe -march=i686
-I/usr/src/kerberosIV/libexec/kipd/../../../crypto/kerberosIV/include
-I/usr/src/kerberosIV/libexec/kipd/../../../crypto/kerberosIV/lib/roken
-I/usr/src/kerberosIV/libexec/kipd/../../../crypto/kerberosIV/lib/krb
-I/usr/src/kerberosIV/libexec/kipd/../../../crypto/kerb
LCA systems doesn't like probing after PCI slot 19.
Probing slot 20 panics the system.
The following patch made it into single user mode on my AXPpci33.
I asume it will also work on multias.
I can't tell more as the tested system is a 4.1-RELEASE and I need
to update the world before further testi
===> usr.bin/netstat
cc -O -pipe -Wall -DIPSEC -DINET6 -DIPSEC -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c
/usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/if.c
In file included from /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/net/if_var.h:78,
from /usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/if.c:49:
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/
No biggie guys...
jlemon, I think you may want to remove the include for sys/mbuf.h in
if_var.h if it isn't needed (try) -- I think this is what may be screwing
up netstat.
Sorry, Steve, for this inconvenience, but this stuff does occasionally
happen in -CURRENT. :-)
On Sat, 25 No
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 18:01:33 -0500 (EST), Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> jlemon, I think you may want to remove the include for
> sys/mbuf.h in if_var.h if it isn't needed (try) -- I think this
> is what may be screwing up netstat.
I tried your suggestion and it got me
On a fresh hard drive I installed 5.0 20001123 Current and got the
following after installation:
Local package initialization:/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
"libc.so.4" not found
I tried again from scratch with 5.0 20001124 Current and have the same
problem.
This affects emacs, apache,
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:18:43AM -0800, Derek Schene' wrote:
> On a fresh hard drive I installed 5.0 20001123 Current and got the
> following after installation:
>
> Local package initialization:/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
> "libc.so.4" not found
we bumped the libc version to 5, bu
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 02:44:08AM -0600, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:18:43AM -0800, Derek Schene' wrote:
> > On a fresh hard drive I installed 5.0 20001123 Current and got the
> > following after installation:
> >
> > Local package initialization:/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: S
Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eivind Eklund wrote:
> > (Based on suggestion from Robert Watson.)
> >
> > I want to enable INVARIANTS by default in -current. This result in some
> > slowdown, but it also makes it more likely that we'll find bugs quickly.
> > People that want to run -
In message <1050.974925641@critter>, Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
>
> The attached patch is a "proof-of-concept" on which I would like
> to get some comments:
>
> It bugs me big time that the output from /etc/rc and all other output
> to /dev/console is volatile and lost once it scrolls of your con
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 03:08:34AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> In this case it doesn't matter -- "a fresh hard drive" and "local
> package" implies that the -current packages on ftp.freebsd.org haven't
> been built since the bump and are thus slightly out dated.
Plus all 3rd party software tha
Hi,
This works ! I was the dummynet victim due to dummynet, but now
I'm saved :-) Hopes this to be committed soon.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 11:40:19AM +0800, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> Please try this patch and report:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~bmilekic/ip_pipe.diff
--
CirX - This sit
Is there reason to believe that we won't have dead lock
problems from the M_WAITOK? It seems like that if anything in
the path needed to full fill the malloc needs to log there
is a problem.
Chuck
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chuck Paterson writes:
>
> Is there reason to believe that we won't have dead lock
>problems from the M_WAITOK? It seems like that if anything in
>the path needed to full fill the malloc needs to log there
>is a problem.
We don't otherwise treat the /dev/cons
Could this be the reason why Avp (virusscanner) for FreeBSD 4X just dumps
core on Fbsd current?
It works on a Fbsd stable.
Leif
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 01:08:37AM +0100, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> > Its in the scrollback buffer.
>
> and how do you access the scroll-back buffer if you are not front to the
> console (read remote) ?
Do you mean remotely loged in across the network, or a serial [remote]
console? If you mean t
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 10:28:53PM +0100, Leif Neland wrote:
> Could this be the reason why Avp (virusscanner) for FreeBSD 4X just dumps
> core on Fbsd current?
> It works on a Fbsd stable.
no, if it was missing the proper version of libc, the linker would let you
know about it. coredump is compl
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:44:34PM -0600, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> > Huh? Why the worst of both worlds??
>
> Incompatible changes AND no way to differentiate between the two. (plus we
> don't even know what changed it, so we have no way of telling people "your
> libc before X won't work with binar
I am not sure, if anybody care for this fix, but I just copied libc.so.5
to libc.so.4 when kde was complaining about not finding it. I am not sure
if this should work, but it does work just fine...
JAn
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:44:34PM -0600, Bill Fu
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 03:07:05PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am not sure, if anybody care for this fix, but I just copied libc.so.5
> to libc.so.4 when kde was complaining about not finding it. I am not sure
> if this should work, but it does work just fine...
It will work for a while.
Gentlemen,
I'm holding up on committing this as we speak as I believe the
counter manipulations become illegal following the ifq locking commits.
This is good as it will give us an opportunity/bigger reason to review
this code further before making a commit.
Feel free to
I'm finally having enough time again to look at FreeBSD again, so I went
back and I'm looking at my port complaints. In looking at a2ps, after I
reinstalled it fresh (so if it'd been changed I would see those) I see it
seems to be going ok, but I pick up a kernel panic whilst printing.
The proce
Thanks for everyone's input, I feel I'm getting closer and see where my previous
thinking had gone wrong.
I tried this-
> I'd suggest just symlinking libc.so.4 to libc.so.5, nothing terrible
> should happen.
and now when booting get-
Local package initialization:fopen: No such file or
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 03:34:49PM -0800, Derek Schene' wrote:
> I tried this-
>
> > I'd suggest just symlinking libc.so.4 to libc.so.5, nothing terrible
> > should happen.
Since nothing has changed in the -CURRENT libc yet, this will work.
BTW, you'd want to do the same for libc_r.so.4.
Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 24 Nov, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
>
> >> >> The attached patch is a "proof-of-concept" on which I would like
> >> >> to get some comments:
> >> >
> >> > I'm only a moronic user, but this would make my life easier. My machine
> >> > switches in
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 01:08:37AM +0100, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> > > Its in the scrollback buffer.
> >
> > and how do you access the scroll-back buffer if you are not front to the
> > console (read remote) ?
>
> Do you mean remotely loged in acros
Christian Carstensen wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Rogier R. Mulhuijzen wrote:
>
> > 1) is this a CardBus card maybe?
>
> It happens with
>
>a) Lucent WaveLAN (silver)
>b) 3com 3c589d
>
>
> > 2) What does 'pccardc dumpcis' return?
>
> Code 85 not found
> Code 85 not found
> code Unkn
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 10:28:53PM +0100, Leif Neland wrote:
> Could this be the reason why Avp (virusscanner) for FreeBSD 4X just dumps
> core on Fbsd current?
> It works on a Fbsd stable.
Could be malloc.conf defaults. i.e. a bug in avp triggered by the
debugging /etc/malloc.conf settings in -c
Please review. This syncs up our code with some NetBSD changes, as well
as attempting to sync rwall up with wall.
Kris
Index: wall/wall.c
===
RCS file: /mnt/ncvs/src/usr.bin/wall/wall.c,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.15 wall
> seems to be going ok, but I pick up a kernel panic whilst printing.
Ditto. Also on a dual-cpu machine, also a really recent CURRENT.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mai
This is strange. I deinstalled all kde11 type ports and then made
installed the kde2 port. However, each time I got and startx, I stay with
kde 1.1.2. I am using Xfree86 4.01 and a reasonably recent version of
CURRENT. Has anybody got an explanation for this behavior?
To Unsubscribe: send mail
32 matches
Mail list logo
