On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 09:41:51PM -0400, Bill Vermillion wrote:
> One of the reasons for the numbers in the SysVR4 arena is to
> set the order of execution so programs which other depend upon
> are executed first. How does the NetBSD solve this problem.
Very coolly. The main rc script runs a s
MIHIRA Sanpei Yoshiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is PC-Card melody beep code for
>5-current(/sys/pccard/pccard_beep.c) from PAO3. This patch does not
>need to change sys/i386/isa/clock.c.
>
>Any problems, please let me know.
I tried this on 4.1.1-STABLE with two pccards: a D-Link DE660
(Yikes, my message turned out to be a bit long, sorry)
I did a little poking around.
I'm running -current as of last Saturday:
# uname -a
FreeBSD panic.localdomain 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Oct
21 22:20:11 PDT 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/local/cvs
up/current/src/sys/PA
Would you add an UPDATING entry for this? Many people have been
reporting problems with the local mailer not knowing these changes.
At Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:19:43 -0700 (PDT),
Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> The following changes have been made in -CURRENT:
>
> 1. mail.local(8) is no longer install
knu> Would you add an UPDATING entry for this? Many people have been
knu> reporting problems with the local mailer not knowing these changes.
I gave the information to Warner, the maintainer of the UPDATING file.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000 20:36:52 -0700 (PDT), Archie Cobbs wrote:
>> Ok, well if I were to netgraphify the ATM code, would mpd be sufficient
>> to get PPP over ATM working? (I have a lot of reading up to do, but
>
>Mpd can do PPP over any netgraph hook, so unless there's some particular
>weirdness t
I run FreeBSD 5.0 on my Compaq Presario 1246 laptop
including an Xircom Realport Ethernet II 10/100 cardbus card.
My kernel includes:
device cardbus
device pccbb
device xe
dmesg reports:
Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 01:05:27AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 09:41:51PM -0400, Bill Vermillion wrote:
> > One of the reasons for the numbers in the SysVR4 arena is to
> > set the order of execution so programs which other depend upon
> > are executed first. How does th
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Brian O'Shea wrote:
>Sounds interesting. To add a new rc script to the system, do you have
>to add an entry to an "rc order list" somewhere (in addition to adding
>the new script)? How is that handled? The nice (or clumsy, depending
>on your point of view) part about the S
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 07:35:39PM -0400, John W. De Boskey wrote:
> - David O'Brien's Original Message -
> > On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 04:14:08PM +0800, Donny Lee wrote:
> > > with the mfs enable, it hangs there right after FILESYSTEM
> > > checking, and with random_load set to YES, it ha
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 05:07:42PM -0400, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Brian O'Shea wrote:
>
> >Sounds interesting. To add a new rc script to the system, do you have
> >to add an entry to an "rc order list" somewhere (in addition to adding
> >the new script)? How is that h
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 05:07:42PM -0400, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> Hmm I don't have any NetBSD machines running the later 1.5 revisions
> yet, so I've not seen the new scripts,
lynx ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-current/src/etc/rc.d/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 05:07:42PM -0400, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
>> Hmm I don't have any NetBSD machines running the later 1.5 revisions
>> yet, so I've not seen the new scripts,
>
>lynx ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-current/src/etc/rc.d/
Thanks,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 02:25:40PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 05:07:42PM -0400, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> > Hmm I don't have any NetBSD machines running the later 1.5 revisions
> > yet, so I've not seen the new scripts,
>
> lynx ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-curre
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 11:05:37AM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > > I wish to update rc.network6 and introduce rc.firewall6.
> >
> > H. I must confess that I see /etc as getting rather cluttered
> > these days. Is there no way to perhaps collap
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:49:40AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> Well, would not be this stepping aside from BSD startup sequence, which we
> all know and love? Having dozens of small files instead of pair of
> big ones always frustrates me when I have to work with linux.
well, it's a single
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:49:40AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > Well, would not be this stepping aside from BSD startup sequence, which we
> > all know and love? Having dozens of small files instead of pair of
> > big ones always frustrates me w
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>Still, it would be better if I could choose between "classical" and "new"
>startup layout, say, somewhere at the installation stage.
Well if you're that stubborn there's no reason that the "new" layout
could not be compiled into a monolithic script.
kernel of today, during a make world, generates:
Oct 23 18:32:18 thelab /boot/kernel/kernel: kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
Oct 23 18:32:32 thelab /boot/kernel/kernel: kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
Oct 23 18:32:39 thelab /boot/kernel/kernel: kernel trap 12 with interrupts disa
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>
> >Still, it would be better if I could choose between "classical" and "new"
> >startup layout, say, somewhere at the installation stage.
>
> Well if you're that stubborn there's no reason that the
I'm beginning to think we need an updating entry.
1. Make sure /dev/random exists 'cd /dev && sh MAKEDEV std'
2. Make sure your kernel includes:
device random # Entropy device
3. Make sure /etc/rc is at rev 1.237 or higher.
4. Make sure /etc/rc.shutdown is at rev 1.13 or 1.1
On 22-Oct-00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> On 20-Oct-00 Valentin Chopov wrote:
>> > I found that if I remove #ifndef SMP /#endif in:
>>
>> Errr, this doesn't really make sense, and if anything is probably
>> hiding the problem. Also, this change will potentially increase
>> interrupt latenc
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:26:07AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >
> > >Still, it would be better if I could choose between "classical" and "new"
> > >startup layout, say, somewhere at the in
It looks like you have the "duration" and "pitch" elements reversed
in your "tone" structure.
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
. . .
+struct tone {
+int duration;
+
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Garrett Rooney wrote:
>> That's an idea! Gotta co recent -CURRENT right now!
>
>might want to port the netbsd code first, since AFAIK this stuff isn't
>in current ;-)
Indeed it's not, but nice to seem him so eager. =)
--
Brandon D. Valentine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Few thin
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 10:17:06PM +0200, Ron Klinkien wrote:
> I run FreeBSD 5.0 on my Compaq Presario 1246 laptop
> including an Xircom Realport Ethernet II 10/100 cardbus card.
>
> My kernel includes:
> device cardbus
> device pccbb
> device xe
>
> [snip dmesg]
>
> According to files in /usr/s
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Brian O'Shea wrote:
> I am also having this problem. If you interrupt it (with ^\ to send
> SIGQUIT), ldconfig generates a core. Then ldconfig will hang while
> setting a.out ldconfig path:
^C also works.
^T is generally useful if you suspect something is hanging on bootup
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> Well if you're that stubborn there's no reason that the "new" layout
> could not be compiled into a monolithic script. In fact perhaps you
> could be the one to step forward and write the code to compile that
> script. ;-)
Indeed, given the slo
On 23-Oct-00 The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> kernel of today, during a make world, generates:
>
> Oct 23 18:32:18 thelab /boot/kernel/kernel: kernel trap 12 with interrupts
> disabled
> Oct 23 18:32:32 thelab /boot/kernel/kernel: kernel trap 12 with interrupts
> disabled
> Oct 23 18:32:39 thel
jwd> 5. At this time, remove ALL MFS filesystems from /etc/fstab.
jwd>They can be hand mounted after bootup or via a local rc
jwd>startup script.
Is there any chance to mount MFS filesystem listed in /etc/fstab just
after the /dev/random reseeding is done ? I cannot put up with that we
c
- Makoto MATSUSHITA's Original Message -
>
> jwd> 5. At this time, remove ALL MFS filesystems from /etc/fstab.
> jwd>They can be hand mounted after bootup or via a local rc
> jwd>startup script.
>
> Is there any chance to mount MFS filesystem listed in /etc/fstab just
> after the
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Reverting src/sbin/newfs/mkfs.c to revision 1.29 fixes
> > the problem.
> >
> > With just a quick review of the patch, I'm not sure I
> > understand what forces the last dirty buffer to be
> > written.
This worried me too.
> Try the enclosed pat
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 02:25:40PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 05:07:42PM -0400, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> > Hmm I don't have any NetBSD machines running the later 1.5 revisions
> > yet, so I've not seen the new scripts,
>
> lynx ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-curre
See below..
- Bruce Evans's Original Message -
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Reverting src/sbin/newfs/mkfs.c to revision 1.29 fixes
> > > the problem.
> > >
> > > With just a quick review of the patch, I'm not sure I
> > > understand what forces the last dirty
Anybody else seeing 'dc0: watchdog timeout' since SMPng integration?
Just after the removal of SPLs on alpha, my UP1000 started
occasionally spewing 'dc0: watchdog timeout' and effectively dropping
off the network when linking 23+ MB alpha kernel.debug's over NFSv3 to
a reasonably snappy NFS s
Brian Smith writes:
> >> Ok, well if I were to netgraphify the ATM code, would mpd be sufficient
> >> to get PPP over ATM working? (I have a lot of reading up to do, but
> >
> >Mpd can do PPP over any netgraph hook, so unless there's some particular
> >weirdness to the framing of PPP frames over
At Mon, 23 Oct 2000 22:46:26 -0400 (EDT),
Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody else seeing 'dc0: watchdog timeout' since SMPng integration?
Yes I have.
I have this several times before SMPng integration at a high load
situation. But, since the integration, it occurs frequently
Maybe kernel image for kern.flp is a little bit larger than a 1.44MB floppy.
***
linking BOOTMFS
textdata bss dec hex filename
2613503 196388 130744 2940635 2cdedb BOOTMFS
install -c -m 555 -o root -g wheel -fschg BOOTMFS /R/stage/kernels
mv /R/stage/kernels/BOOTMFS /R/st
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 06:30:29PM -0400, John W. De Boskey wrote:
>
> 5. At this time, remove ALL MFS filesystems from /etc/fstab.
>They can be hand mounted after bootup or via a local rc
>startup script.
You can leave them in, with option "noauto", and mount them later with
"mount -a -
39 matches
Mail list logo
