With the latest kernel/module restructuring, the kernel is now installed
as /boot/kernel/kernel.ko. So, basically, if one opts to _not_ build
modules w/kernel as per /etc/make.conf, no modules are installed in
/boot/kernel other than the kernel itself, kernel.ko. This means that
various modules
In trying to create a port, I'm running into the following problem:
Everything compiles fine on 3.5 -STABLE (last built on Jul 14), but on
-CURRENT (Aug 29) one of the .so files reports: 'Undefined symbol
"__pure_virtual"'
The port defines USE_NEWGCC, so gcc 2.95.2 19991024 is used on both syste
Does anyone has any idea why forwarded connections (with an entry in
.ssh/config or with -L ::) often
ends up taking ages to setup ? During that time the connection itself is
blocked with some data in the Recv-Q...
localhost.euroco.6674 *.*tcp0 0 LISTEN
localhost
Kent Hauser wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I just did something foolhardy -- and yet instructive. Pls let
> me relate.
Longish story about MAKEDEV limitations..
I suggest you become familiar with the chroot command.
> Regards,
> Kent
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "uns
On -current trying to do
fdwrite < kern.flp
I get
panic: isa_dmastart: bad bounce buffer
Can anybody confirm/deny this is a general problem ?
The machine is a K7 with 512M RAM
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC
0+0x4+0x40117]
ok boot
Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 5.0-2912-PHK #0: Tue Sep 12 10:30:17 GMT 2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 07:58:26AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> > Sheldon can probably render an opinion on their usage of the macros.
>
> OK, I'm looking forward to see it :-)
If he doesn't in the next couple of days (no pressure, Sheldon :-) ) then
go ahead and commit.
N
--
Internet conne
Hi guys,
For those of you running VMWare (2) on -current, how fast do you expect it to
be?
I'm running it quite successfully on a 750MHz PIII w/ 128MB RAM, and the
following disk controller / disk
atapci0: port 0xfc90-0xfc9f at device 7.1 on pci0
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
a
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 05:33:10 -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
> To remedy this, I suggest we have an option in /etc/defaults/make.conf
> to _not_ wipe out any modules in /boot/kernel (except kernel.ko of
> course) if modules are not built with kernel.
This sounds like a very bad idea, since it encour
> > To remedy this, I suggest we have an option in /etc/defaults/make.conf
> > to _not_ wipe out any modules in /boot/kernel (except kernel.ko of
> > course) if modules are not built with kernel.
> This sounds like a very bad idea, since it encourages folks to use
> modules which are not synchroni
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 10:00:06 -0400, Michael Lucas wrote:
> Some of us rebuild kernels without supping. I, for one, play with all
> sorts of kernel options to see what they do.
Then you probably want the kernel reinstall target. I don't think that
this target is available from src/Makefile.in
Nik Clayton wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> For those of you running VMWare (2) on -current, how fast do you expect it to
> be?
>
> I'm running it quite successfully on a 750MHz PIII w/ 128MB RAM, and the
> following disk controller / disk
>
> atapci0: port 0xfc90-0xfc9f at device 7.1 on pci0
>
Julian Elischer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Nik Clayton wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > For those of you running VMWare (2) on -current, how fast do you expect it to
> > be?
> >
> > I'm running it quite successfully on a 750MHz PIII w/ 128MB RAM, and the
> > following disk controller / dis
I have seen this too ...
Let me first ask ... do you use the "suspend/resume" option??
If Yes then :)
This caused the same "lockup" every few seconds on my machine too -
a much slower 400 PII. As soon as I "shutdown" Win9X and rebooted
it worked fine.
I guess it is something in VMware that s
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 04:04:20PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 10:00:06 -0400, Michael Lucas wrote:
>
> > Some of us rebuild kernels without supping. I, for one, play with all
> > sorts of kernel options to see what they do.
>
> Then you probably want the kernel rein
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 10:13:16 -0400 (EDT)
Thomas David Rivers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Julian Elischer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm confused...
'fraid so. It is raw devices (for discs) that linux doesn't have,
they are all block devices - although I may be out of date it's bee
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:27:45PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
> For those of you running VMWare (2) on -current, how fast do you expect it to
> be?
I'm running it on my PIII 366 laptop. It's not great, but it's usable.
The biggest factors I've seen effecting performance are memory related.
Runnin
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 18:11:20 +0200, "Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen" wrote:
> Hmm, how about those of us doing buildworlds/buildkernels on
> one (nfs)server for subsequent installworlds/installkernels
> on multiple other machines?
You run buildkernel once, and then installkernel multiple times. Tha
> > On that subject, can you give me a rough projection as to when
> > 5.0-RELEASE is likely to arrive?
>
> FreeBSD 2.2.1 1997-04-xx [FBD]
> FreeBSD 3.0 1998-10-16 [FBD]
> FreeBSD 4.0 2000-03-13 [FBD]
You forgot FreeBSD 4.1, 2000-07-27 (www.freebsd.org/releases)
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> I'm also not sure where the rumors about a FreeBSD 4.1.5 got started
> since I'd certainly never planned on such a thing, that, I think,
A certain user called jkh on IRC :-). I asked you and you agreed to it as
a net-only release.
Kris
--
In God we
On Tuesday, 12 September 2000 at 10:13:16 -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
>
> Julian Elischer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>> Nik Clayton wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> For those of you running VMWare (2) on -current, how fast do you expect it to
>>> be?
>>>
>>> I'm running it quite successful
> A certain user called jkh on IRC :-). I asked you and you agreed to it as
> a net-only release.
Hmmm. I must have been on drugs. :) Very well, I'll see what can be
done. A test release is actually building right now.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
22 matches
Mail list logo
