On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 12:29:40PM +0700, Nickolay Dudorov wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > ru 2000/08/01 01:15:06 PDT
> >
> > Modified files:
> > usr.bin/kdumpmkioctls
> > Log:
> > Fix an off-by-nine error when building a list of includes.
>
dear All,
i need to build a large number of machine with a customer distribution
based on 4.1-RELEASE
are there any pointers or help you can give me on how to create an ISO
image of my distribution ?
--
Marc Teichtahl
Manager, Data Network DesignVersatel Telecom
"W
On Wed 2000-08-02 (11:05), Marc Teichtahl wrote:
> i need to build a large number of machine with a customer distribution
> based on 4.1-RELEASE
>
> are there any pointers or help you can give me on how to create an ISO
> image of my distribution ?
cd /usr/src/release && make release
You might
Hi,
Below I have part of ppp.log.
Could you tell me what the fifth line does mean?
What is CD?
When I try to connect using ATDT12345
I get message 'BUSY'.
--
Aug 2 11:57:11 sec ppp[205]: tun0: Phase: bundle: Establish
Aug 2
On my -current box, kernel compilation failed at module building.
===> dc
cc -g -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi
-DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I/usr/include -mp
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Piotr [iso-8859-1] Woniak wrote:
> Hi,
> Below I have part of ppp.log.
> Could you tell me what the fifth line does mean?
> What is CD?
Carrier Detect?
> When I try to connect using ATDT12345
> I get message 'BUSY'.
>
I keep getting panics on -current since mid juli, they seem to
always accour here:
IdlePTD 3264512
initial pcb at 299f00
panicstr: page fault
panic messages:
---
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x4
fault code = supervisor read, page not
cc -march=pentium -Os -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace
-I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../.. -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c ioctl.c
In file included from ioctl.c:94:
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/memrange.h:18: warning: `MDF_ACTIVE'
redefined
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/pc
On Wed, 02 Aug 2000 09:19:36 -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
> In file included from ioctl.c:63:
> /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/net/if_ieee80211.h:14: `ETHER_ADDR_LEN'
> undeclared here (not in a function)
I'm pretty sure this was fixed several hours ago.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send
cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions
-ansi -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -D_KERNEL -include
opt_global.h -elf -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 ../../pci/if_dc.
On Wed, 02 Aug 2000 08:31:59 EST, Stephen Hocking wrote:
> cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extension
s
> -ansi -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -D_KERNEL -include
Yeah - I was just trying to express my irritation without being overly nasty.
Beats me why thing are commited without being compiled though.
Stephen
--
The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor.
"We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produc
A friend of a friend asked me to find out how ATA66 support was coming
along. Is it still necessary to disable DMA or PIO settings for it to work?
jm
--
-
Jonathon McKitrick -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The physicist's greatest tool
after doing a cvsup I tried to build a new kernel
and found that I was getting this error: (while doing config)
../../conf/files: coda/coda_fbsd.c must be optional, mandatory or standard
so, I searched the mailing lists and found that I needed to update
/usr/sbin/config, so I did, and was abl
* j mckitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000802 06:38] wrote:
>
> A friend of a friend asked me to find out how ATA66 support was coming
> along. Is it still necessary to disable DMA or PIO settings for it to work?
There's rumors of some "problem" chipsets, but afaik 66 has been working
for quite som
Just recently build a kernel from cvsup, and the kernel won't boot. It
gets to the point where you see
booting [kernel]
\
And it just hangs right there. There's a lot of disk activity, and after
about 2 minutes (and no boot messages), I see a login prompt, but the
machine is froze. Anyone els
It seems j mckitrick wrote:
>
> A friend of a friend asked me to find out how ATA66 support was coming
> along. Is it still necessary to disable DMA or PIO settings for it to work?
ATA66 has been working for quite some time now. Beware that there are
some disks that claim to be able to do ATA66
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 12:04:19PM -0400, Rex A. Roof wrote:
> /tmp/ccv99837.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/ccv99837.s:772: Error: operands given don't match any known 386 instruction
> /tmp/ccv99837.s:837: Error: operands given don't match any known 386 instruction
> After searching the mailing li
ok, here's the output from uname -a
FreeBSD shaolin.wccnet.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #2: Thu Apr 27 19:04:53 EDT
2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/SHAOLIN i386
usually, in the past, I've found the best way to upgrade (and, what
I thought was the proper way) was to mak
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Rex A. Roof wrote:
> ok, here's the output from uname -a
>
> FreeBSD shaolin.wccnet.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #2: Thu Apr 27 19:04:53
>EDT 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/SHAOLIN i386
>
> usually, in the past, I've found the best way to upgrade (a
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 08:31:00AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * j mckitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000802 06:38] wrote:
> >
> > A friend of a friend asked me to find out how ATA66 support was coming
> > along. Is it still necessary to disable DMA or PIO settings for it to work?
>
> There's
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On 1 Aug, Nick Hibma wrote:
>
> Hm, I had a look at the source code, and to be honest I can't find a
> single reason why the path would be unset.
>
> Did the CD reader detached itself from the bus in the meantime, or did
> something like a bus error occur? Check your messages log around the
> t
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 01:25:18AM -0400, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
>Hmm, maybe the complainers should provide proof that they do
>need more than 2^256 complexity. Makes it easier for us,
>proponents ;-/
How about creating one-time pads?
That said, in Applied Cryptography, Schneier makes th
I originally sent this to -committers but was advised that the
maintainers and -hackers or -current was more appropriate.
I've posted some patches for PR 14682 which include some changes to
the source code for lpr(1), lprm(1) etc.
Could someone review them for me please, especially the C code.
At 10:39 PM +0100 8/2/00, Mark Ovens wrote:
>I originally sent this to -committers but was advised that the
>maintainers and -hackers or -current was more appropriate.
>
>I've posted some patches for PR 14682 which include some changes
>to the source code for lpr(1), lprm(1) etc.
>
>Could someone
I don't recall seeing this mentioned: In order to access the Internet,
I need to use proxy authorization. With the old fetch(1) I could use
an environment variable like "HTTP_PROXY_AUTH=basic:*:" and
it would prompt for a password.
The new libfetch-based fetch(1) ignores the HTTP_PROXY_AUTH var
Hi everyone.
Ok apologies first to anyone who has been asked this question before, I've
searched the mail lists and cannot find anything like this recently.
The problem is when using user ppp and some kind of traffic monitor program
like trafshow or tcpdump. There are three problems I've notice
28 matches
Mail list logo
