Problem building a snapshot for current, no more "more"

In attempting to build a snapshot for current, I came across the following problem in the release.4 target of the Makefile in /usr/src/release. ... cc -static -o boot_crunch boot_crunch.o sh.lo find.lo sed.lo test.lo rm.lo pwd.lo ppp.lo sysinstall.lo newfs.lo minigzip.lo cpio.lo fsck.lo ifconfig

Re: ftp(1) breakage w/ passive mode?

> On Wed, 31 May 2000 10:14:33 +0900 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: itojun> isn't there some issue in getipnodebyname(), instead of getaddrinfo()? itojun> (NOTE: I'm not really up-to-date with the current status of freebsd4 itojun> lib/libc/net) itojun> if you can tell me repeatable example of

Re: Looking for testers for if_dc patches

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 09:29:46AM -0700, Bill Paul wrote: > > On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 12:28:25AM -0700, Bill Paul wrote: > > > Several people have reported problems with if_dc botching autonegotiation > > > on 21143 NICs with non-MII media, such as the DEC/Compaq DE500-BA and > > > the built-in 1

Re: Looking for testers for if_dc patches

Just to see if if_dc has kept working on a machine that had it working before (Alpha Miata GL): works just fine with the patches applied. Wilko [goes back to digging up the Miata MX5] -- Wilko Bulte FreeBSD, the power to serve http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: kerneld for -current

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:17:22AM -0400, Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO wrote: > is there any interest in ``kerneld'' (a-la Linux) for FreeBSD? i've got > some working prototype Could you summerize what it offers and does? -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Disclaimer: Not speaking for Fr

RE: kerneld for -current

> > is there any interest in ``kerneld'' (a-la Linux) for > FreeBSD? i've got > > some working prototype > > Could you summerize what it offers and does? from RedHat documentation: Red Hat Linux includes kerneld, the Kernel Daemon, which automatically loads some software and hardware suppo

Re: Looking for testers for if_dc patches

On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 12:30:51PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 09:29:46AM -0700, Bill Paul wrote: > May 31 10:56:38 p6 /kernel: dc0: port > 0xec00-0xec7f m > em 0xfdfffc00-0xfdfffc7f irq 9 at device 3.0 on pci0 > May 31 10:56:38 p6 /kernel: dc0: Ethernet address: 00:00:f8:

Re: "fetch | sh" panics system

Christian Weisgerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following, completely innocuous command line > $ fetch -o - http://sites.inka.de/mips/unix/freebsd/xterm.shar | sh > executed as a non-priviledged user, reproducibly panics the machine. Some people have mailed that this particular command lin

/dev/lkm

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: /dev/lkm

Kent Hauser wrote: > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message Heh. Well, I can probaby answer the question you meant to ask. Yes, /dev/lkm is gone. See kldload(2) and kldload(8) etc. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMA

Re: unknown:

> > IF and ONLY IF the PNPBIOS code is causing your machine to fail, do the > > following: > > > > - Send me FULL DETAILS; this will need to include the trap messages and, > >if the trap is in the kernel, a DDB traceback. > > > > The described situation actually occured to me tonight (5-28-2

Error on gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb?

Error occured at buildworld on my box... - ... ===> gnu/usr.bin/binutils/doc rm -f gdb-cfg.texi inc-hist.texi inc-hist.texi.orig as.info ld.info annotate.info gasp.info gdb.info gdbint.info stabs.info as.info.gz ld.info.gz annotate.info.gz gasp.info.gz gdb.info.gz gdbint.info.gz stabs.info