Just out of curiosity, why is there an "AGAIN" in the subject line,
since this is the first email I've gotten on the subject?
tcpdump is capable of decrypting ESP, if you give it the key and if it's
linked with libcrypto. Since IPSEC is part of FreeBSD, and libcrypto
is part of FreeBSD, I figur
> Just out of curiosity, why is there an "AGAIN" in the subject line,
> since this is the first email I've gotten on the subject?
Sorry, the first queries about this probably didn't go directly to you
since it was only yesterday that I actually bothered to go track down
the specific commit which
On Friday, March 31, 2000, Bill Fenner wrote:
> It didn't occur to me that this would change where tcpdump lived
> (i.e. it seemed like libcrypto was part of FreeBSD) so it wasn't an
> explicit choice on my part to move distributions. I agree that's a bad
> side effect. It's easy to disable the
>That said, isn't there some way we could build it twice, once for the
>crypto dist and once for the bindist? That would mean that the crypto
>distribution copy simply blops over the bin distribution version if
>selected and POLA is fully obeyed.
Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. I'd be happy
> Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. I'd be happy if someone else wants
> to look at this, or I can look at it on the 10th when I get back from
> Australia. This would mean there's a src/secure/usr.sbin/tcpdump that
> builds with crypto and src/usr.sbin/tcpdump that builds without?
Correct! Bo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes:
>The general problem with the timecounter is that not only is the hardware
>indeterminant, but the timecounter structure itself is *NOT* MP safe,
>at least not by my read of it.
Well, read again then :-)
I've had a paper in the
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> Does softupdates provide faster performance than async/noatime? I keep
> /usr/src and /usr/obj as such, would it be faster with softupdates? And
> if so, why?
Async is theoretically faster if it is implemented properly. It is poorly
implemented
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jesper Skriver writes:
>On the box below, a relative new dual PIII box, with a Intel
>motherboard, does it use the i8254 or the PIIX timecounter ?
>
>[...]
>Timecounter "PIIX" frequency 3579545 Hz
You're using the PIIX.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD c
Hello,
On 0, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Paul Richards wrote:
>
> > I stuck a dlerror() in there and the problem is
> >
> > usr/lib/librsaINTL.so: Undefined symbol "BN_mod_exp_mont"
>
> This symbol is defined in bn_ext.c and should be compiled into libcrypt
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Bill Fenner wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, why is there an "AGAIN" in the subject line,
> since this is the first email I've gotten on the subject?
First I've heard about it too.
> It didn't occur to me that this would change where tcpdump lived
> (i.e. it seemed like lib
> There *were* several problems with the .ifdefs in the tcpdump makefile
> which I fixed prior to 4.0, and I thought I had fixed the problem of
> tcpdump in the bin distribution being linked against libcrypto (this was
> broken in the initial 4.0 Release but fixed when jkh rereleased it). If I
> s
At 5:44 PM -0600 2000/3/30, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> Does softupdates provide faster performance than async/noatime? I keep
> /usr/src and /usr/obj as such, would it be faster with softupdates? And
> if so, why?
Of course, once you ask this question, the next logical one that
fol
At 10:41 AM +1000 2000/3/31, Carl Makin wrote:
> heh, the buzzword for this is "Dynamic Failover". :) In management
> circles where the current focus is on 24x7, this is seen as a distinct
> advantage.
Okay, then I'd certainly like to have that.
> "Dual Pathing" the buzzword for us
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> What you missed is that this pass is done once, in the release.2
> target of release/Makefile. Perhaps if you'd also special-cased it in
> release.5, it might have worked as you expected.
Aha, so I see. I'll commit a fix tomorrow if you don't get
Leif Neland wrote:
>
> > It seems Warner Losh wrote:
> ...
> > > mount it in front of the drive to get it to run at a reasonable
> > > temperature. W/o the fan, it was running at 58C or so. With the fan
> > > it runs at 39C or so. I've included the script that I use to find
> > > this informa
The following patch is for -CURRENT. It at least gets past that dumb
floppy loop. The problem I'm having is that after the scripts, nothing
else is done, it just sits there with "Welcome to PicoBSD". Any ideas?
To Luigi: I made the changes you asked for, disregard that patchfile as
I've incorpora
I need to store some info (in kernel) indexed by peer hosts ip
addresses. in_hostcache.h interface looks good, but i hasn't found any use
of it in -CURRENT kernel sources. It this interface obsoleted by other?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in
Subject: Mail::Internet test subject
This is a test message that was sent by the test suite of
Mail::Internet.
Testing.
one
>From foo
four
>From bar
seven
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Subject: Mail::Internet test subject
This is a test message that was sent by the test suite of
Mail::Internet.
Testing.
one
>From foo
four
>From bar
seven
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Subject: Mail::Internet test subject
This is a test message that was sent by the test suite of
Mail::Internet.
Testing.
one
>From foo
four
>From bar
seven
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Someone can this idiot.
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 05:11:34PM +0200, Charlie Root wrote:
> Subject: Mail::Internet test subject
>
>
> This is a test message that was sent by the test suite of
> Mail::Internet.
>
> Testing.
>
> one
>
> >From foo
> four
>
> >From bar
> seven
>
>
> To Unsubscr
Hot days of 4.0 preparation are behind. May be some
guru will find the solution for the subject?
Two problems are here
a) devices without driver attached to 'unknown' driver, thus
no orphan devices -- no reason to call device_probe method
from kldloaded driver.
b) if disable 'unknown' dri
:The thing is i'm not sure if it's vinum, I could also duplicate this on
:another machine without vinum.. except I duplicated it differently..
:
:Consider the following perl script:
:
:#!/usr/bin/perl
:for ( ; ; ) {
:system("fetch http://www.web.site/index.html");
:}
:
:Of course, replaci
::Jason DiCioccio
Another possibility -- could you post your 'dmesg' output? One thing
that NFS does do is severely exercise both the network and the SCSI
device in a concurrent fashion.
If you happen to be using an NCR SCSI chipset, that could be the cause
of the problem (t
I have just managed to get the following going:
By writing a device driver that is two terminals back-to-back,
and configuring vmware to map one of the virtual ttys over the
'null-modem' device, and then running a kernel configured with the console
on com1 and the gdb port on com2, (in the virtu
Julian Elischer writes:
|
| I have just managed to get the following going:
|
| By writing a device driver that is two terminals back-to-back,
| and configuring vmware to map one of the virtual ttys over the
| 'null-modem' device, and then running a kernel configured with the console
| on com1 a
:I have just managed to get the following going:
:
:By writing a device driver that is two terminals back-to-back,
:and configuring vmware to map one of the virtual ttys over the
:..
:
:Thus no need to have that second machine for debugging..
::-)
:It's amazing to see on the same X screen,
:1/ The
Here is my dmesg output, and btw, sorry.. the perl script was not running
on the NFS volume, just regularly on a regular 4.0 box, and it crashed the
box (yes, I had login limits set), I was just giving another example of
what seems to be some instability in 4.0 under high loads..
Here my dmesg fr
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes:
>:I have just managed to get the following going:
>:
>:By writing a device driver that is two terminals back-to-back,
>:and configuring vmware to map one of the virtual ttys over the
>:..
>:
>:Thus no need to have that second machine for debug
One more thing, here's my kernel config file just in case you need it:
machine i386
cpu I586_CPU
ident RAID
maxusers64
makeoptions DEBUG=-g#Build kernel with gdb(1) debug
options DDB_UNATTENDED
options INET
I'll put the device driver on http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/
but it needs teh eyes of someone who's really at home in the tty system
to look at it. I got kinda confused half way through hacking it (from the
pty driver) and it shows. basically each pair of minor numbers is a pair
and are connecte
Oh? can you run a kernel in a jail for debugging?
That's what I'm using it for..
(debugging kernel code.. I only have one machine here.)
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >run 4000 copies or so of linux under VMWare on FreeBSD :-)
Unfortunatly you can only run one vmware at a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian El
ischer writes:
>Oh? can you run a kernel in a jail for debugging?
No, not quite yet, but what IBM bragged about the 41k linuxes for
was for what jails do for you.
Poul-Henning
>That's what I'm using it for..
>(debugging kernel code.. I only have one ma
Hi
I have four (4) ATA disks, all same new 20GB IBM 7200rpm models. Intel
Seattle BX2 mobo, PIIX4 controller. I'm not expecting any performance
increase or such, simply want to get my hands on. Ata driver, as the
-current doesn't have wd anymore.
I have raid5 volume laid over four disks, containi
It seems Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have four (4) ATA disks, all same new 20GB IBM 7200rpm models. Intel
> Seattle BX2 mobo, PIIX4 controller. I'm not expecting any performance
> increase or such, simply want to get my hands on. Ata driver, as the
> -current doesn't have wd anymore.
> I hav
Hi,
I'm trying to track down the change that broke my ppp.
The symptoms are that I cannot telnet out though my ppp0 interface.
Ktrace indicates that the connect() to the remote system never returns
(it may eventually timeout - I didn't wait a really long time).
However, I run natd and have sever
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Nikolai Saoukh wrote:
> Hot days of 4.0 preparation are behind. May be some
> guru will find the solution for the subject?
>
> Two problems are here
>
> a) devices without driver attached to 'unknown' driver, thus
>no orphan devices -- no reason to call device_probe met
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:55:37PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
> I will try to tackle these issues soon. Due to other commitments, this
> won't happen for a few days though.
Can I halp somehow?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the m
> It has the internal identification `kern/17715'.
> The individual assigned to look at your
> report is: freebsd-bugs.
>
> >Category: kern
> >Responsible:freebsd-bugs
> >Synopsis: io memory requests from pnp devices lands in video bios
> >Arrival-Date: Fri Mar 31 12:50:01 PST
Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
| In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian
|El
| ischer writes:
|
| >Oh? can you run a kernel in a jail for debugging?
|
| No, not quite yet, but what IBM bragged about the 41k linuxes for
| was for what jails do for you.
Nope not quite. Since you could actually crash
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 12:24:27PM +0200, a little birdie told me
that Brad Knowles remarked
> At 5:44 PM -0600 2000/3/30, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>
> > Does softupdates provide faster performance than async/noatime? I keep
> > /usr/src and /usr/obj as such, would it be faster with softupdate
On Friday, 31 March 2000 at 21:32:22 +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Vallo Kallaste wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have four (4) ATA disks, all same new 20GB IBM 7200rpm models. Intel
>> Seattle BX2 mobo, PIIX4 controller. I'm not expecting any performance
>> increase or such, simply want to get my h
:I'm not sure that this is the same problem. Please supply the
:information I ask for in http://www.lemis.com/vinum/how-to-debug.html.
:
:The problem that Søren and I are looking at is usually a panic. We
:don't really know where it's happening, but we're each sure it's not
:in *our* code :-) F
On Friday, 31 March 2000 at 16:37:44 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure that this is the same problem. Please supply the
>> information I ask for in http://www.lemis.com/vinum/how-to-debug.html.
>>
>> The problem that Søren and I are looking at is usually a panic. We
>> don't really
I just go two new wavelan cards.
The drivers comes up and the interface is there but
these messages keep appearing.
No traffic seems to get through.
FreeBSD lupo.thebarn.com 4.0-STABLE FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE #6: Thu Mar 30
23:15:22 CST 2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/export/cyan/src/sys/compile/LUPO i386
This can be deleted from "src/etc/defaults/make.conf" now, right? I
can't find any uses of it in the tree.
# To tell the base system that you are using RSAREF (from ports).
# (This needs revisiting) - it is very likely that this is too
# heavily tied to USA_RESIDENT==YES.
#RSAREF
A similar patch was added for the USA version of RSA for the same basic reason.
Your patch is almost correct. It should add the line:
LDADD+= -L$[.OBJDIR]/../libcrypto -lcrypto
Your version would reference the system crypto library and not the one being
built as part of buildworld.
Jim Bloom
[
Hi,
Boy I wish I had read this message before I went out and bought a USB zip
drive... I'm in the exact same situation IOPENER with 4.0 installed and
screwed up to a point where I can boot but not mount the sandisk drive. I
figured that I would get a zip drive and mount it instead.
Anyways if
I rebuilt my -current system this morning and am now getting paincs with
both the SMP and non-SMP kernels. The current panic with a uniprocessor
kernel is:
panic: pmap_enter: invalid page directory, pdir=0, va=0xc0da
It occurs right after the output for pci0. I'm currently sitting at the d
:I rebuilt my -current system this morning and am now getting paincs with
:both the SMP and non-SMP kernels. The current panic with a uniprocessor
:kernel is:
:
:panic: pmap_enter: invalid page directory, pdir=0, va=0xc0da
:
:It occurs right after the output for pci0. I'm currently sitting a
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :I rebuilt my -current system this morning and am now getting paincs with
> :both the SMP and non-SMP kernels. The current panic with a uniprocessor
> :kernel is:
> :
> :panic: pmap_enter: invalid page directory, pdir=0, va=0xc0da
> :
> :It occurs r
Patrick Hartling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > :I rebuilt my -current system this morning and am now getting paincs with
> > :both the SMP and non-SMP kernels. The current panic with a uniprocessor
> > :kernel is:
> > :
> > :panic: pmap_enter: invalid
:Revision 1.5 of sys/isa/pnpparse.c has fixed my problems, and I didn't have
:to give up the shared memory options. It was acquired through the magic of
:cvsweb and copied over via a floppy. :) What a day.
:
: -Patrick
Ah, excellent.
P.S. word to the wise even though this wasn't your
It seems Greg Lehey wrote:
>
> The problem that Søren and I are looking at is usually a panic. We
> don't really know where it's happening, but we're each sure it's not
> in *our* code :-) From a Vinum standpoint, it happens between the time
> that Vinum sends a request to the driver and when th
Does anyone have any experiance or information about using HP JetDirect 500X
Printer Hubs with FreeBSD ? This is mission critical for my company, so any
information greatly appriciated.
Thank you.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body o
55 matches
Mail list logo
