It seems Motomichi Matsuzaki wrote:
>
> Thank you for fixing, but still not probed.
> What can I do for your work?
> ata-pci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at device 7.1 on pci0
> ata0: iobase=0x01f0 altiobase=0x03f6 bmaddr=0xf000
> ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00
> ata0: mask=03 status0=00 status1=00
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 03:03:32PM +1100, Andy Farkas wrote:
> What is the reason for putting a giant "Example!" in hosts.allow?
So you'll notice that this file is an example and *demands* your
attention in configuring your system properly.
> I note that it was committed at 3 o'clock in the mor
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 03:03:32PM +1100, Andy Farkas wrote:
> Here is a patch: (please notice the spelling correction)
Where? I just ran ispell on src/etc/hosts.allow and it didn't catch
anything.
--
-- David([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsu
At Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:29:32 +0100 (CET),
Soren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thank you for fixing, but still not probed.
> > ata-pci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at device 7.1 on pci0
> > ata0: iobase=0x01f0 altiobase=0x03f6 bmaddr=0xf000
> > ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=00
> > ata0: mask=
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 03:03:32PM +1100, Andy Farkas wrote:
> > Here is a patch: (please notice the spelling correction)
>
> Where? I just ran ispell on src/etc/hosts.allow and it didn't catch
> anything.
A more direct patch would have been:
-# NOTE: The hosts.deny file is not longer us
Lars Eggert writes:
> Running the following test script causes perl to crash. You may need
> to run the script several times before seeing the problem. (The script
> spawns a child process that does nothing but write to an array. The
> parent signals the child periodically.)
Signals and Perl do n
Ilya,
thanks for the quick response.
> Signals and Perl do not mix. Please do not use signals if a segfault
> is not a desirable form of output.
Never? After reading perlipc I was under the impression that using signals
was okay if you keep your handlers simple. I may have to use to another fo
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 09:53:27PM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote:
> > Signals and Perl do not mix. Please do not use signals if a segfault
> > is not a desirable form of output.
>
> Never?
Never. Well, I did not try XSUB signal handlers, but if it is a Perl
subroutine, then the harm may be already
All,
I've just found that read from /dev/bpfX never return EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK.
It means that when you do a non blocking read and there is no data you will
always get 0.
Does it suppose work this way?
A non blocking read from pipe return EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK if there is no data
and
pipe was opened
> Do you have any comment anout the patch? If there isn't any big
> problem, I hope to commit it to current.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> I wrote:
> > Do you remember this topic? I have revised the indirection support
> > patch. What I have changed are:
> > - to make diff files more readable
> >
Luoqi Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We shouldn't need bus_simple_create_bsh(). All drivers ought to use
> rman_get_bushandle()/rman_get_bustag() to retrieve the bus handle and tag,
> and use them in bus_space_read/write calls to perform device io. Drivers
> that don't do that should be fixed.
> > Why have two files bus_at386.h and bus_pc98.h? I386_BUS_PIO_IND should be
> > able to live with I386_BUS_PIO and I386_BUS_MEMIO happily together.
>
> Because they are different in the type of bus_space_tag_t from each
> other. It is the u_long in PC/AT and the structure in PC-98. For
> exam
Luoqi Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could set the handle to point to the structure instead:
I think it is difficult to implement such conversion because:
- Not only bus space stuff also resource manager stuff need to
perform such conversion.
- The type of the bus_space_handle_t
> I think it is difficult to implement such conversion because:
>
> - Not only bus space stuff also resource manager stuff need to
> perform such conversion.
Why? Both bus_space_handle_t and bus_space_tag_t are supposed to be
opaque types. Resource manager needs not know the implementation
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
