On 29-Dec-99 Charles Anderson wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm trying to get the quake 1 source to compile and work under
> freebsd with glx.
'me too' :)
I have it working, it has some 'interesting' colour problems tho..
And it hangs after about 10 seconds of playing around. (Its killable
though)
Spe
The details were previously posted by .
Good Nite
--
Amancio Hasty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> The details were previously posted by .
>
> Good Nite
>
>
Whatever ate the details on your previous post seems to be at it again.
--
- bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - BF1560 - computer horizons corp -
- ph:(800) 252-2421 - [EMAIL PROTECT
> On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>
> > The details were previously posted by .
> >
> > Good Nite
> >
> >
>
> Whatever ate the details on your previous post seems to be at it again.
Here is a copy of my mail post which I received from the -current mail list
that is my post went
Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> >
> > > The details were previously posted by .
> > >
> > > Good Nite
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Whatever ate the details on your previous post seems to be at it again.
>
> Here is a copy of my mail post which I received from th
Look I stated previously and only a few hours ago:
---
>Yes, I can rightfully claim that you cannot build XFree86 3.9 xxx dated
>December 24 with the default gcc compiler on FreeBSD -current.
>
>I am running FreeBSD -current and XFree86 3.9xxx cur
Amancio Hasty wrote:
>
> Look I stated previously and only a few hours ago:
>
> ---
> >Yes, I can rightfully claim that you cannot build XFree86 3.9 xxx dated
> >December 24 with the default gcc compiler on FreeBSD -current.
> >
> >I am running Fr
> Hi Lists,
>
> How are the implementation of IPv6 in FreeBSD 4.0? Is it available? Is it
> stable?
The work on the current is still going on.
Followings are already committed, and seems to be working well.
-most of IPv6 extensions in kernel(tcp for IPv6 and IPv6 multicasting not yet)
-IPsec i
I am using yesterday's snapshot (12-27). /etc/pam.conf is dated 12/21.
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Murray wrote:
>
> > I just got my box up and running Current 12-27. ATA works great for =
> > both drives now. However, I compiled XFree86 from the port and I chose =
> > the opt
Nope! Not too tricky. Should this be added to the file permanantly, or
perhaps as part of the port?
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clive Lin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 11:01:50PM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just got my box up and running Current 12-27.
I have noticed that /etc/make.conf is missing from the current source
tree and I can not find any mention of its removal anywhere. Where did
it go?
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Hi,
> I have noticed that /etc/make.conf is missing from the current source
> tree and I can not find any mention of its removal anywhere. Where did
> it go?
See /etc/defaults ;-)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter Wemm writes:
> : Just as a BTW, dfr and sos are exchanging patches right now (and have been
> : for quite a few days) that happen to fix the inthand_add() stuff.
>
> This may also help the pccard code cases which I ha
FYI for the list; this has been fixed and committed now. Another problem
in vn when backed with swap was found and fixed too.
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :
> :Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :[..]
> :> And, in anycase, I am not going to spend hours putting together a long
> :> involved patc
I can't get the nist port to compile:
c++ -g -O2 -Wall -DDO_NIST -DPACKAGE=\"ac3dec\" -DVERSION=\"0.5.5\"
-I../../inc -c bitstream.c -o bitstream.o
In file included from decode.h:24,
from bitstream.c:27:
../../inc/athread.hh: In function `int athr_setschedparam(pthread *, int,
s
At 8:12 PM +0800 1999/12/28, Peter Wemm wrote:
> FYI for the list; this has been fixed and committed now. Another problem
> in vn when backed with swap was found and fixed too.
Was the vn problem an issue for 3.x as well? If so, is there any
chance of getting this mfc'ed any time so
Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 8:12 PM +0800 1999/12/28, Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> > FYI for the list; this has been fixed and committed now. Another problem
> > in vn when backed with swap was found and fixed too.
>
> Was the vn problem an issue for 3.x as well? If so, is there any
> chance of
Seigo Tanimura wrote:
>
> Ouch, the patch broke Rollemup, so I fixed just now. The URI is the same.
>
> Seigo> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/newmidi/2ndbuf-19991227.diff.gz
Great, the sound drivers are working very nicely on my ESS 1868.
Does pcm support SoundBlaster WavEffects?
On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> I can't get the nist port to compile:
the same thing. css-auth builds fine.
sincerely,
ilya naumov (at work)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 09:31:50PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > Recently someone posted a url that provided a quick run through on some
> > important extra steps to take while doing a make world from -STABLE to
> > -CURRENT, unfortunatly I lost the URL. I was wondering if someone could
> > post
It seems Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> I can't get the nist port to compile:
> c++ -g -O2 -Wall -DDO_NIST -DPACKAGE=\"ac3dec\" -DVERSION=\"0.5.5\"
> -I../../inc -c bitstream.c -o bitstream.o
> In file included from decode.h:24,
> from bitstream.c:27:
> ../../inc/athread.hh: In f
It seems Soren Schmidt wrote:
> Uhm, seems like we need to define _POSIX_THREAD_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING now
> to get the prototypes for these, add:
>
> #ifdef __FreeBSD__
> #define _POSIX_THREAD_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING
> #endif
>
> At line 80 in inc/athread.hh
Just to follow up on my self, I've put up
It seems David Gilbert wrote:
> I've had my share of problems with this drive's DMA abilities. I'm
> convinced that it has none... even though it probes as such.
>
> ad0: ATA-0 disk at ata0 as master
> ad0: ...
> ad0: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, DMA
>
> now... when I boot -v, I don't have a ch
Does anyone have the linux-realplayer-5.0 port working under -current?
I'm running a -current that is a few days old, and have a "Creative
ViBRA16C" sound chip. Playing a CDROM using xcdplayer works, but when
I try to use realplayer, it just seems to hang.
Here are the relevant lines from my boo
On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> > I can't get the nist port to compile:
> > c++ -g -O2 -Wall -DDO_NIST -DPACKAGE=\"ac3dec\" -DVERSION=\"0.5.5\"
> > -I../../inc -c bitstream.c -o bitstream.o
> > In file included from decode.h:24,
> >
Why bother with 5.0? It cant play any modern streams anyway.
http://proforma.real.com/real/player/linuxplayer.html
I've been using the Linux G2 player on my -current box for a while
now. Video can get a little choppy, and theres an occasional crash, but
otherwise its fine. ( This is with both
Hello fellow hackers,
I've written up a short patch to add a sysctl to control the appending of
/compat/linux/ to path requests in Linux mode. We had to get ADSM's Linux
client working on FreeBSD so we could do backups of our systems. Luckily
it comes statically linked so all was needed was thi
On Tue, Dec 28, 1999 at 05:34:34PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > It seems Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> > > I can't get the nist port to compile:
> > > c++ -g -O2 -Wall -DDO_NIST -DPACKAGE=\"ac3dec\" -DVERSION=\"0.5.5\"
> > > -I../../inc -c bitstrea
> They're in sys/unistd.h, which is included by unistd.h. That should be
> just fine, and that location appears to be consistent with our other POSIX
> macro definitions.
Ahh, good. I didn't have them because I wasn't up to date.
So the question is now, why wasn't the nist port picking them up
> >Actually, that's one of the newest versions of gcc.
>
> Perhaps a later snapshot of gcc will work .
GCC 2.95.2 is a *RELEASED* version. We don't use snapshots as the base
compiler. What every the problem is 4.0 will live with it unless someone
narrows down the problem more.
--
-- David
On Sun, Dec 26, 1999 at 12:13:42PM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
> I get similar errors trying to compile aview from ports. I just
> updated my ports tree, so that can't be the problem. See the
> attached make.log. There's something about not allowing access
> to the cx register.
...
> sstring.h:49
Hi Lists,
How are the implementation of IPv6 in FreeBSD 4.0? Is it available? Is it
stable?
What is better: use FreeBSD 3.4 with Kame or FreeBSD 4.0?
Thanks,
Luciano Rabelo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Thats nice . Now we have a compiler which fails to build X.
> > >Actually, that's one of the newest versions of gcc.
> >
> > Perhaps a later snapshot of gcc will work .
>
> GCC 2.95.2 is a *RELEASED* version. We don't use snapshots as the base
> compiler. What every the problem is 4.0 will l
> Thats nice . Now we have a compiler which fails to build X.
This seems like hyperbole. I'm able to build X just fine with the
-current compiler, so to directly imply that we can't do so flies in
the face of common sense and experience.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Doug White wrote:
> Hello fellow hackers,
>
> I've written up a short patch to add a sysctl to control the appending of
> /compat/linux/ to path requests in Linux mode. We had to get ADSM's Linux
> client working on FreeBSD so we could do backups of our systems. Luckily
Yes, I can rightfully claim that you cannot build XFree86 3.9 xxx dated
December 24 with the default gcc compiler on FreeBSD -current.
I am running FreeBSD -current and XFree86 3.9xxx current.
> > Thats nice . Now we have a compiler which fails to build X.
>
> This seems like hyperbole.
On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> Yes, I can rightfully claim that you cannot build XFree86 3.9 xxx dated
> December 24 with the default gcc compiler on FreeBSD -current.
>
> I am running FreeBSD -current and XFree86 3.9xxx current.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Typically this empty space would
It seems Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > They're in sys/unistd.h, which is included by unistd.h. That should be
> > just fine, and that location appears to be consistent with our other POSIX
> > macro definitions.
>
> Ahh, good. I didn't have them because I wasn't up to date.
>
> So the question is
Hello,
I'm trying to get the quake 1 source to compile and work under freebsd with glx.
Most of the graphics parts work, and I can play, but I can't seem to get it to
mmap the dsp dma buffer like it wants to.
I have ripped out part of the code to demonstrate the problem. All I had to
change to
39 matches
Mail list logo
