On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 09:56:49AM +1000, Brett White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone tried using the 4.0-19991012-CURRENT snapshot? I
> need to confirm that this snapshot is a "good one" before I
> update my 3.3R installation to it in a last ditch effort to
> compile USB modem support
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote:
> > i've tried new "camfied" aic driver today and failed. here is a brief
> > report.
> >
> > results:
> >
> > aic controller was successfully found by the kernel, but after "Waiting 15
> > seconds for SCSI devices to settle" message it said the following
I also tried to experiment with the aic driver (and also failed, little
similar to Ilya's problems)
Configuration:
Asus P2B-DS motherboard with dual PII-350, 128 Mb of memory, running
4.0-19990918-CURRENT.
Adaptec AIC 7890 on-board U2W SCSI controller.
Adaptec AVA 1505 (AIC 6360Q) isa SCSI contr
> The following patch from Doug Rabson fixed the USB and sound problem for
> me. It has already bee committed to -current.
My AudioPCI card works again. Thanx!
Regards,
Marc
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Luoqi Chen wrote:
>
> I've ported it to -stable, but I don't have a machine to test it, please
> if you could. The code is in http://www.freebsd.org/~luoqi/aic/stable,
> apply patch files.diff, copy aic_isa.c to i386/isa, the rest goes to dev/aic.
>
I cannot compile a kernel. It reports the fol
I've rewritten the ISA bus front end code for if_ep and would like to
solicit testers.
ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/patches/if_ep.diff
You'll have to edit sys/i386/isa/isa_compat.h and remove all the
references to epdriver and NEP.
Right now 'wired' devices aren't supported so use
device
As the title says, is anyone working on support for Athlons, and when can we
expect it to arrive back in -stable ?
(I can't find anything in the latest versions of sys/i386/i386/identcpu.c)
Also, what actually needs to be done, it doesn't look difficult to add code to
recognise the cpu, what ex
>
> As the title says, is anyone working on support for Athlons, and when can we
> expect it to arrive back in -stable ?
>
> (I can't find anything in the latest versions of sys/i386/i386/identcpu.c)
You should try looking harder:
CPU: AMD-K7(tm) Processor (499.03-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin =
On Monday, 18 October 1999 at 2:09:49 +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 12:50:04 +1300
>> From: Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Michael Reifenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, FreeBSD-Cu
On Monday, 18 October 1999 at 1:35:16 +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 12:16:19 +1300
>> From: Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Michael Reifenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: Fre
On Monday, 18 October 1999 at 0:43:21 +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
>> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 15:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
>> From: Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Michael Reifenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: FreeBSD-Current <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sunday, 17 October 1999 at 22:42:51 +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> Hi,
> I got the following crash since a couple of time since upgrading one machine to
> -current as of today. It seems to occurs during somewhat heavier diskaccess.
> Sorry no detailed backtrace for now because I deleted m
Is anyone else playing with the MegaRAID series of controllers ? I just
started testing one out today (My Mylex comes later this week). I noticed
the BIOS is V 1.38 dated June 10 1996. Should I upgrade it ? What have
others tested / used?
I have been playing for now with RAID 0 to get a se
Hello Oliver,
Wednesday, October 20, 1999, 4:12:37 AM, you wrote:
OF> > Chaintech 6BTM mainboard with Celeron 416A processor and 128 Mb of memory
it is just Celeron 333A overclocked up to 416 MHz (5 x 83.5).
Best regards,
Ilyamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsub
> cd0 at aic0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
> cd0: Removable Worm SCSI-2 device
> cd0: 3.300MB/s transfers
> cd0: cd present [1 x 77747 byte records]
^
These numbers don't look right...
> but, unfortunately, scsi probe precedure seems to be relatively
> unstable. _sometimes_ (o
> I also tried to experiment with the aic driver (and also failed, little
> similar to Ilya's problems)
>
Could you download the new set of files and see if it helps?
> as devices. What puzzles me is why the probe at the aic0 wants to look
> at bus 0. Shouldn't that be bus 1? Or should I add a s
> As the title says, is anyone working on support for Athlons, and when
> can we expect it to arrive back in -stable ?
>
> (I can't find anything in the latest versions of sys/i386/i386/identcpu.c)
>
> Also, what actually needs to be done, it doesn't look difficult to add
> code to recognise the c
> Luoqi Chen wrote:
> >
> > I've ported it to -stable, but I don't have a machine to test it, please
> > if you could. The code is in http://www.freebsd.org/~luoqi/aic/stable,
> > apply patch files.diff, copy aic_isa.c to i386/isa, the rest goes to dev/aic.
> >
>
> I cannot compile a kernel. It
Doing nightly build attempt for 4.0-19991020-CURRENT at Wed Oct 20 02:06:54 CDT 1999
Updating source tree...
? release.out
Making release...
Release build of 4.0-19991020-CURRENT was an abject failure.
[...]
===> sbin/tunefs
install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 tunefs /vol2/release/s
I was wondering, is there any way to get a call-graph of the startup of
FreeBSD (current) up until, say, the end of signle-user startup? One
annotated with file/line info regarding funciton location? Not a line by
line thing, but function call by function call?
I was wondering if maybe there co
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Bill Paul wrote:
> install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 mount_nwfs /vol2/release/sbin
> install: mount_nwfs: No such file or directory
Ok, it seems that I found why mount_nwfs failed to build: I'm use
'install' instead of ${INSTALL} in the libncp.
> Can somebody
Stephen Roome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As the title says, is anyone working on support for Athlons, and when can we
> expect it to arrive back in -stable ?
Athlons don't need any special support, they are fully compatible with
Intel's latest processors.
> (I can't find anything in the lat
22 matches
Mail list logo
