I just tried the latest -CURRENT snapshot, 19991009 ,.. Now, on the old
floppy, I could set the parameters for ed0 and it would find ed0.. now it
doesn't find ed0 at all although it still finds 'unknown0' .. When you
fixed this freezing, did this ruin some other detection or something to
that effe
Sounds like you havn't -current.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Smith writes:
>> just cvsupped
>
>Your system; I just finished a world not five minutes ago. Suspect the
>usual.
>
>> echo '#include ' >> config.h
>> echo '#include "i386/xm-i386.h"' > tconfig.h
>> echo '#include "i386/i386.h
Just a reminder I guess,
# uname -v
FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Oct 10 16:16:34 EST 1999
# mt retension
console emits (in bright white):
WARNING: driver sa should register devices with make_dev() (dev_t = "#sa/1")
--
:{ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy Farkas
System Administrator
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Jason DiCioccio wrote:
> I just tried the latest -CURRENT snapshot, 19991009 ,.. Now, on the old
> floppy, I could set the parameters for ed0 and it would find ed0.. now it
> doesn't find ed0 at all although it still finds 'unknown0' .. When you
> fixed this freezing, did thi
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> Meanwhile the mystery has been solved. I was a miscommunication
> between sos and me. He only committed one half of the fix for
> this issue.
>
> He has now committed the rest along with the latest version of
> his ata drivers (he claims :-)
Things are fine here n
Hi
On line 72 of , there is a reference to 'union sigval',
which is declared in , but inside #ifndef _POSIX_SOURCE.
The X build heavily uses _POSIX_SOURCE, so this breaks.
Should line 72 of not move a little further down into
the #ifndef _POSIX_SOURCE block below it?
M
To Unsubscribe: send m
> On line 72 of , there is a reference to 'union sigval',
> which is declared in , but inside #ifndef _POSIX_SOURCE.
> The X build heavily uses _POSIX_SOURCE, so this breaks.
>
> Should line 72 of not move a little further down into
> the #ifndef _POSIX_SOURCE block below it?
This is supposed t
> > o unzip setup.zip to someplace comfortable
>
> Don't both with that.
>
> use "export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/tmp/sv001.tmp:." before running the setup binary.
^^^
That number changes, so you might have to go into /tmp and delete stale
directories.
Nick
--
e
>> *** Signal 12
>> Stop in /usr/src/gnu/lib/libgcc.
>> *** Error code 1
> Suspect that you need a newer kernel before you can build the world.
had to
o make new config
o make new kernel
o reboot
o make world
o ...
must have been an exciting time in current while i was on the road the
Randy Bush wrote:
> just cvsupped
>
> echo '#include ' >> config.h
> echo '#include "i386/xm-i386.h"' > tconfig.h
> echo '#include "i386/i386.h"' > tm.h
> echo '#include "i386/att.h"' >> tm.h
> echo '#include "i386/freebsd.h"' >> tm.h
> echo '#include "i386/perform.h"' >> tm.h
> cc -c -O -pipe -I
I just built and installed sources cvsup'd at 17:45 CDT October 9 with
${MAKE_KERBEROS4} enabled, but the Kerberized telnet was not installed. I
looked over the recent changes to add SRA to telnet, but I am not familiar
enough with the order in which things are built and installed to figure
out w
I finally got a chance to put the ata driver back in my kernel, and this
is what happens: Whenever I am doing something that requires a lot of disk
activity, (on the latest errors, I was recompiling the kernel with make
-j8 and building gnomelibs):
Oct 10 12:29:48 culverk /kernel: ata0-slave: ad_
Sorry I can't get pnpinfo, I can tell you though that dmesg does not even
show ed0 being probed at all.. In other words, it does nto even say 'ed0
not found at 0x240' .. And I am not deleting the device :-).. Are there
any conditions where this would happen?
Thanks
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Doug Rabs
For quite some time, I've been having panics while running X and never saw
the actual message. This time, I happened to be in console mode when the
crash happened. Here is the panic message:
kernel: type 12 trap, code=0
Stopped at pmap_remove_pages+0xd0: decl 0(%ecx)
The stack trace I got was:
It seems Kenneth Culver wrote:
Is this with the latest that I committed yesterday ??
-Søren
> I finally got a chance to put the ata driver back in my kernel, and this
> is what happens: Whenever I am doing something that requires a lot of disk
> activity, (on the latest errors, I was recompilin
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Jason DiCioccio wrote:
> Sorry I can't get pnpinfo, I can tell you though that dmesg does not even
> show ed0 being probed at all.. In other words, it does nto even say 'ed0
> not found at 0x240' .. And I am not deleting the device :-).. Are there
> any conditions where this
Another note :) .. PnP also probes unknown0 on the wrong irq (irq 3) while
it should be on irq 7
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Jason DiCioccio wrote:
>
> > Sorry I can't get pnpinfo, I can tell you though that dmesg does not even
> > show ed0 being probed at all
It seems Kenneth Culver wrote:
> ata0: slave: success setting up UDMA2 mode on PIIX4 chip
> ad1: piomode=4 dmamode=2 udmamode=2
> ad1: ATA-3 disk at ata0 as slave
> ad1: 4120MB (8438850 sectors), 8930 cyls, 15 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S
> ad1: 16 secs/int, 0 depth queue, UDMA33
Uh oh, I had one of
It doesn't seem to have bad sectors...
found-> vendor=0x109e, dev=0x036e, revid=0x02
class=04-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=1
subordinatebus=0secondarybus=0
intpin=a, irq=9
map[0]: type 3, range 32, base ea002000, size 12
found-> vendor=0x109e, dev=0x0878, re
sure, as soon as i get a chance, I'll do that for ya.
Ken
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Kenneth Culver wrote:
> > Oct 10 12:29:48 culverk /kernel: ata0-slave: ad_timeout: lost disk contact
> > - res
> > etting
> > Oct 10 12:29:49 culverk /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Jason DiCioccio wrote:
> Another note :) .. PnP also probes unknown0 on the wrong irq (irq 3) while
> it should be on irq 7
Actually, we can put the card on any irq which it supports as long as
there isn't a conflict. Unless you have a sio1 in that box (which normally
uses i
It seems Kenneth Culver wrote:
> Oct 10 12:29:48 culverk /kernel: ata0-slave: ad_timeout: lost disk contact
> - res
> etting
> Oct 10 12:29:49 culverk /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. DANGER
> active=3
> Oct 10 12:29:49 culverk /kernel: done
> Oct 10 12:29:49 culverk /kernel: ad1: status=51 err
Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Kenneth Culver wrote:
> > ata0: slave: success setting up UDMA2 mode on PIIX4 chip
> > ad1: piomode=4 dmamode=2 udmamode=2
> > ad1: ATA-3 disk at ata0 as slave
> > ad1: 4120MB (8438850 sectors), 8930 cyls, 15 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S
> > ad1: 16 secs/int, 0 depth qu
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
> Your card is an SMC EtherEZ (8416). I think that needs some special
> extra tricks to get it supported. Matt Dodd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> working on this recently but I don't know if he has it working yet.
I've got uncommitted patches that fix this I be
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Assar Westerlund writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> We have now come so far that we can start to kill cdevsw_add()
>> calls and rely on make_dev() for most of the device drivers.
>
>So how is this supposed to work for device kld's? Currently,
Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have now come so far that we can start to kill cdevsw_add()
> calls and rely on make_dev() for most of the device drivers.
So how is this supposed to work for device kld's? Currently,
cdevsw_add() gets called from the glue generated by DEV_MODUL
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
> > Your card is an SMC EtherEZ (8416). I think that needs some special
> > extra tricks to get it supported. Matt Dodd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> > working on this recently but I don't know if he has it working y
Patrick Hartling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
} For quite some time, I've been having panics while running X and never saw
} the actual message. This time, I happened to be in console mode when the
} crash happened.
I meant to include that I'm using XFree86 3.3.5 built from the ports
collection w
I have noticed similarly odd behaviour from softupdates during heavy
IO load, where something is creating lots of little files or
directories and not much else is happening. Using `vmstat 1` I can see
that softupdates isn't very good at evening out the IO rate over time:
there's a roughly sinusoid
Bruce Evans writes:
> > W`hile installworld is being discussed, I wanted to get this out there:
> >
> > Since rev 1.13 of usr.bin/make/arch.c, I've been seing a problem with
> > ELF archive libraries being rebuilt unnecessarily. I believe that
> > this problem can be traced to the RANLIBMA
It worked when it was probed non-pnp :-).. As long as I set the params..
DId you get my email with pnpinfo and dmesg?
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Jason DiCioccio wrote:
>
> > Another note :) .. PnP also probes unknown0 on the wrong irq (irq 3) while
> > it sho
Julian Elischer writes:
> that fix was applied by me about 5 minutes ago..
>
Thank you!
Drew
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
that fix was applied by me about 5 minutes ago..
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Bruce Evans writes:
> > > W`hile installworld is being discussed, I wanted to get this out there:
> > >
> > > Since rev 1.13 of usr.bin/make/arch.c, I've been seing a problem with
> > > ELF ar
I Can't believe this email only produced TWO responses!
I would have thought that this wouldhav brought out the chainsaws!
Maybe no-one is listenning on 'arch' any more, or maybe 'arch' doesn't
work? (the only responders got it via 'core')
julian
On Sat, 9 Oct 1999, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > PHK
A while back I posted a message here saying that I'd changed the xl driver
a bit to hopefully improve performance for 3c90xB and later adapters (i.e.
the "cyclone," "hurricane" and "tornado" chipsets). I asked for people
to report if the changes helped, hurt, made no difference or were totally
br
> I Can't believe this email only produced TWO responses!
> I would have thought that this wouldhav brought out the chainsaws!
> Maybe no-one is listenning on 'arch' any more, or maybe 'arch' doesn't
> work? (the only responders got it via 'core')
Interesting. It appears that somehow I got 'unsu
> > > > Maybe no-one is listenning on 'arch' any more, or maybe 'arch' doesn't
> > > > work? (the only responders got it via 'core')
> > >
> > > Interesting. It appears that somehow I got 'unsubscribed' from arch.
> > > Not sure why, but in May I was subscribed, but I'm no longer subscribed.
> >
> [Mayhaps too many Cc:'s kept in order to reach relevant audience]
Thanks, sorry about the X-posting...
> On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 02:57:55PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
> > > I Can't believe this email only produced TWO responses!
> > > I would have thought that this wouldhav brought out the ch
[Mayhaps too many Cc:'s kept in order to reach relevant audience]
On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 02:57:55PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
> > I Can't believe this email only produced TWO responses!
> > I would have thought that this wouldhav brought out the chainsaws!
> > Maybe no-one is listenning on 'ar
Nate Williams wrote in list.freebsd-current:
> Interesting. It appears that somehow I got 'unsubscribed' from arch.
> Not sure why, but in May I was subscribed, but I'm no longer subscribed.
>
> Did everyone get unsubscribed when it went idle?
FWIW, I got unsubscribed, too. While I were at
>
> FWIW, I got unsubscribed, too. While I were at it, I sent a
> "which" command to the majordomo, and the result did not list
> me as a member of freebsd-announce and freebsd-security-
> notifications. When I tried to re-subscribe, it told me that
> I am already subscribed...
>
> Seems like
On 1999-Oct-11 08:35:41 +1000, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>Nate Williams wrote in list.freebsd-current:
> > Interesting. It appears that somehow I got 'unsubscribed' from arch.
> > Not sure why, but in May I was subscribed, but I'm no longer subscribed.
> >
> > Did everyone get unsubscribed when it we
On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 04:59:34PM -0400, Bill Paul wrote:
> I need feedback from people so that I know it's safe to merge this
> stuff into -stable, so let's hear it already. It's been several weeks
> since I made the changes. Surely there are people running -current
> with 3Com 3c90xB cards.
>
send it to postmaster instead.
jmb
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Jonathan M. Bresler wrote in list.freebsd-current:
> > FWIW, I got unsubscribed, too. While I were at it, I sent a
> > "which" command to the majordomo, and the result did not list
> > me as a member of freebsd-announce and freebsd-security-
> > notifications. When I tried to re-subscribe, i
>
> Here's the whole story:
>
> - I sent a "which" command from the newsgate account.
>
> - Got a response with about 30 lists to which that account
>is subscribed.
>
> - Compared those lists to the lists that the newsgate
>is prepared to handle (and to which it was once subscribed)
>It seems Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
>> It looks like both nsio and sio have PCCARD support disabled at the
>> moment. Is there any other way I can get the system to recognize my
>> modem?
>
>Fix the broken sio, it might be KNF and all but it doesn't work...
>
>-Soren
The pccard brokenness is not si
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate writes:
>I note that David is no longer on the list ([EMAIL PROTECTED] was
>'unsubscribed, either accidentally or intentionally). Justin is gone,
>and many other folks I would have considered to be folks interested that
>were once subscribed...
"Accidental" re
Jonathan M. Bresler writes:
> > Here's the whole story:
> >
> > - I sent a "which" command from the newsgate account.
> >
> > - Got a response with about 30 lists to which that account
> >is subscribed.
> >
> > - Compared those lists to the lists that the newsgate
> >is prepared to h
:> > 6/ It should be possible to make an overlay device (similar to the way
:> > ccd works), that supplies buffered characteristics to a disk. This may
:> > be a different minor number or a differnt major number.. but be a CHR
:> > type device.
:>
:> This would involve needless dupli
I've been mysteriously unsubscribed from -questions sometime between Oct
7th and Oct 10th. My guess puts it at late morning/early afternoon EDT on
the 7th.
It would seem something is up... good thing somebody mentioned the 'which'
command (I'd never heard of it), I was wondering why noone was
Tom Embt wrote:
>
> I've been mysteriously unsubscribed from -questions sometime between Oct
> 7th and Oct 10th. My guess puts it at late morning/early afternoon EDT on
> the 7th.
>
> It would seem something is up... good thing somebody mentioned the 'which'
> command (I'd never heard of it),
Huh?
I'll check it out..
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Andy Farkas wrote:
>
> Just a reminder I guess,
>
> # uname -v
> FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Oct 10 16:16:34 EST 1999
>
> # mt retension
>
> console emits (in bright white):
>
> WARNING: driver sa should register devices with make_dev() (dev_
> I just built and installed sources cvsup'd at 17:45 CDT October 9 with
> ${MAKE_KERBEROS4} enabled, but the Kerberized telnet was not installed. I
> looked over the recent changes to add SRA to telnet, but I am not familiar
> enough with the order in which things are built and installed to figu
> I just built and installed sources cvsup'd at 17:45 CDT October 9 with
> ${MAKE_KERBEROS4} enabled, but the Kerberized telnet was not installed. I
> looked over the recent changes to add SRA to telnet, but I am not familiar
> enough with the order in which things are built and installed to figu
I just installed it out of curiosity. Everything went well until I try to execute
it. It starts as if it were going to work and then it gives me a core dump with a
message box that says, "An unrecoverable error has occurred. All modified files
have been saved and probably can be recovered at re
At Sun, 10 Oct 1999 23:40:04 PDT, Edwin Culp wrote:
>I just installed it out of curiosity. Everything went well until I try to exe
>cute
>it. It starts as if it were going to work and then it gives me a core dump wi
>th a
>message box that says, "An unrecoverable error has occurred. All modifie
57 matches
Mail list logo
