Re: New ATA stuff, questions and comment

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Doug wrote: > > > First a question, namely what is the current state of the ATA > > drivers in -current? Are they reliable (where "reliable" goes by -current > > terms obviously)? I finally am in a position to test them with a new > > workstation that has IDE disks, so

Re: KLD cdev example doesn't work anymore

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
find /usr/src -name \*.c | xargs grep DEV_DRIVER_MODULE and check the changes on that file. For your reference, the changes that have recently been made to ugen.c with respect to the cdevsw thingies: RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/usb/ugen.c,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.1

Re: New ATA stuff, questions and comment

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
It seems Michael Class wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Doug wrote: > > > > > First a question, namely what is the current state of the ATA > > > drivers in -current? Are they reliable (where "reliable" goes by -current > > > terms obviously)? I finally am in a position to test them with a new >

Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) (fwd)

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Some interesting comments from an interesting source. BTW. I'd appreciate it if everyone noticed how friendly and helpful Linus is and Not find some thing to rag on linux about with this. The aim of this thread is to improve FreeBSD in any way we see as being a real improvement. Don't cc him bac

UPDATE9: ATA/ATAPI driver new version available.

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Nine'th update to the new ATA/ATAPI driver: The atapi subsystem has gotten better error handeling and timeouts, it also tries a REQUEST SENSE command when devices returns errors, to give a little more info as to what went wrong. It might be a little verbose for now, but I'm interested in as muc

Re: Intel Pro 100+ Server Adapter

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 07:42:59PM -0700, JMS Internet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I recently purchased a Intel Pro 100+ Server Adapter > for my FreeBSD machine (3.1), but I can't find any information if it is > supported, > or not... I'm also not sure which driver I would use for it.. I

Re: FreeBSD on Merced

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Are there any plans to port FreeBSD to the IA-64 architecture when it >comes out? The docs have recently been released > http://developer.intel.com/design/ia64/architecture.htm >so I was wondering if anyone had a chance to look at the stuff. When I looked a coupl

Re: a few comments on make release

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> 1) a cross-reference to http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ243.html#246 >in the docs in /usr/src/release is useful! > > how about adding one to the Makefile > > 2) you can't always do a make release without 1:1 agreement between >your runtime state and the CVS and /usr/src repositarie

traceroute breakage in -current

1999-06-25 Thread John Polstra
I just noticed that traceroute in -current is starting its probes with port 1 instead of 33435 as it is supposed to do: tcpdump: listening on fxp0 09:05:03.527313 206.213.73.12.38947 > 204.216.27.21.1: udp 12 [ttl 1] 09:05:03.532569 206.213.73.12.38947 > 204.216.27.21.2: udp 12 [ttl 1] 09:05:03.5

Changing the semantics of splsoftclock()

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
I've come across several instances where I need to fiddle with state that is also touched by a timeout handler. From a naming standpoint, splsoftclock() sounds like the correct spl routine to use for protecting these activities. Unfortunately this only holds true if splsoftclock() is used in a p

Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftclock()

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
I've come across several instances where I need to fiddle with state that is also touched by a timeout handler. From a naming standpoint, splsoftclock() sounds like the correct spl routine to use for protecting these activities. Unfortunately this only holds true if splsoftclock() is used in a p

Changing the semantics of splsoftclock()

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
[ Sorry for the duplicate message for some of you. I botched the headers on the original mail. ] I've come across several instances where I need to fiddle with state that is also touched by a timeout handler. From a naming standpoint, splsoftclock() sounds like the correct spl routine to use

Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftclock()

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Why have splr semantics? That is, it raises to splsoftclock if current priority is lower, else doesn't fiddle with it. On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > I've come across several instances where I need to fiddle with state that > is also touched by a timeout handler. From a naming s

Re: UPDATE9: ATA/ATAPI driver new version available.

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Trying the updated driver, I notice that the first time I try to mount the cdrom drive, it hangs, I hit ^C and get this error: atapi_error: PREVENT_ALLOW - timeout error = 00 After that, I can mount it fine. This system is all SCSI except for the cdrom, which is a generic 6x IDE cdrom drive. H

accessing CD using new ATA drivers

1999-06-25 Thread NemoX
What is the device node that is used to access the cdrom in ATA? /dev/acd0c doesnt seem to work, although that is the one specified in dmesg acd0: CDROM drive at ata0 as slave acd0: drive speed 4125KB/sec, 128KB cache acd0: supported read types: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA acd0: Audio: play, 256 volume l

Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftclock()

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
[ I've dropped [EMAIL PROTECTED] based on a request from Theo since he cannot post back to some of these lists. ] >Why have splr semantics? That is, it raises to splsoftclock if current >priority is lower, else doesn't fiddle with it. This is what I meant to suggest, but if this is not doable,

Re: UPDATE9: ATA/ATAPI driver new version available.

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
It seems Neal Westfall wrote: > Trying the updated driver, I notice that the first time I try > to mount the cdrom drive, it hangs, I hit ^C and get this > error: > > atapi_error: PREVENT_ALLOW - timeout error = 00 > > After that, I can mount it fine. This system is all SCSI except > for the cd

Re: UPDATE9: ATA/ATAPI driver new version available.

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > atapi_error: PREVENT_ALLOW - timeout error = 00 > > > > After that, I can mount it fine. This system is all SCSI except > > for the cdrom, which is a generic 6x IDE cdrom drive. > > Hmm, that is a little wierd since: > > > Here is the relevant pro

Re: UPDATE9: ATA/ATAPI driver new version available.

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Here is the complete output of dmesg in case it is helpful: Copyright (c) 1992-1999 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #106: Fri Jun 25 10:00:44 PDT 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: place of logfile for cron (PR 7682)

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Stephen J. Roznowski wrote: > On 24 Jun, Nick Hibma wrote: > > > > The logfile for CRON is in the wrong place IMHO. It's in /var/cron/log. > > The FreeBSD style is to put those things in /var/log (/var/log/cron). > > > > Anyone any opinions on this? Which scripts depend on

ctm

1999-06-25 Thread Chuck Robey
I'm working on restoring ctm finally (now the disk is working, and the extra room is terrific!) I am going to do things manually for a short while, so the interval of things is going to be unpredictable, but I'd consider it a favor if, when you get a ctm, you email me directly. Keep the ctm stuf

'make all' in /sys/i386/boot fails

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
I was working on my com console stuff and when I went into /sys/i386/boot and did a 'make all install clean' to rebuild my boot blocks (after changing /etc/make.conf) it fails due to an error in the netboot sub directory. I don't need netboot so I just deleted it temporarily in the makefil

boot -P AND autoboot possible?

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
I set up a serial console on my -current box and putting "-P" in /boot.config worked just fine, but I'd really like to use the new loader and such, plus according to the man page for loader /boot.config is deprecated. The only problem is I couldn't figure out where exactly this option shou

NT vs Linux benchmark saga continues (fwd)

1999-06-25 Thread Matthew Jacob
It'd be interesting to see where FreeBSD stacks up -- Forwarded message -- Date: 25 Jun 1999 17:00:02 -0400 From: Ramana Juvvadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NT vs Linux benchmark saga continues http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,1015266

Re: a few comments on make release

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
[cd image making code removed] Bewdiful. just what the docter ordered. thanks! -George To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: traceroute breakage in -current

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
John Polstra wrote: > > I just noticed that traceroute in -current is starting its probes > with port 1 instead of 33435 as it is supposed to do: > > tcpdump: listening on fxp0 > 09:05:03.527313 206.213.73.12.38947 > 204.216.27.21.1: udp 12 [ttl 1] > > It broke in revision 1.9 of "src/contrib/tr

Re: traceroute breakage in -current

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Karl Pielorz writes: > > I just noticed that traceroute in -current is starting its probes > > with port 1 instead of 33435 as it is supposed to do: > > > > tcpdump: listening on fxp0 > > 09:05:03.527313 206.213.73.12.38947 > 204.216.27.21.1: udp 12 [ttl 1] > > > > It broke in revision 1.9 of "sr

Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftclock()

1999-06-25 Thread Bruce Evans
>>Why have splr semantics? That is, it raises to splsoftclock if current >>priority is lower, else doesn't fiddle with it. splsoftclock() has always had spllower() semantics, and its main users (kern_clock.c and kern_time.c) depend on this. FreeBSD has a precedent of not changing poor spl names

Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftclock()

1999-06-25 Thread Matthew Jacob
> >>Why have splr semantics? That is, it raises to splsoftclock if current > >>priority is lower, else doesn't fiddle with it. > > splsoftclock() has always had spllower() semantics, and its main users > (kern_clock.c and kern_time.c) depend on this. Okay. Then Justin's suggestion of splcallout

Re: 'make all' in /sys/i386/boot fails

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> I was working on my com console stuff and when I went into > /sys/i386/boot and did a 'make all install clean' to rebuild my boot > blocks (after changing /etc/make.conf) it fails due to an error in the > netboot sub directory. I don't need netboot so I just deleted it > temporarily in the

.: Out of file descriptors ??

1999-06-25 Thread Bruce Burden
Hi all, I did a cvsup on the night of June 24/25, got the world built, installed, /etc updated, the kernel config file updated, built the kernel, updated it, and when I attempt to boot, I get the following error: .: Out of file descriptors This is shortly after the "

Re: .: Out of file descriptors ??

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> > >Hi all, > >I did a cvsup on the night of June 24/25, got the world built, >installed, /etc updated, the kernel config file updated, built >the kernel, updated it, and when I attempt to boot, I get the >following error: > > .: Out of file descriptors You copied /e

Re: Out of file descriptors ??

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
From: Bruce Burden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I did a cvsup on the night of June 24/25, got the world built, >installed, /etc updated, the kernel config file updated, built >the kernel, updated it, and when I attempt to boot, I get the >following error: > > .: Out of file descriptors > C

Re: 'make all' in /sys/i386/boot fails

1999-06-25 Thread Doug
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > I was working on my com console stuff and when I went into > > /sys/i386/boot and did a 'make all install clean' to rebuild my boot > > blocks (after changing /etc/make.conf) it fails due to an error in the > > netboot sub directory. I don't need net

Re: boot -P AND autoboot possible?

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:13:20 MST, Doug wrote: > I can submit patches for the man page(s) if I can get a grip on what's > happening where (and when). :-/ What I'd really like to see is a > chronological listing, like: I think you're reading the wrong manpage. I've just had a look at loader(8)

Re: 'make all' in /sys/i386/boot fails

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999 18:46:05 MST, Doug wrote: > Where would I go if I wanted to rebuild my boot blocks to make the > com console run at a different speed, or is this something I could set > with one of the voluminous conf files in /boot, or?? Try src/sys/boot ? Tip for the future: When you ne

gdb no longer works?

1999-06-25 Thread Alex Zepeda
I've tried numerous times (updating the kernel, buildworld, etc) to get gdb to work, but so far it seems like ELF coredumps are broken (course this could be a C++ issue too): zippy:~#gdb `which konqueror` konqueror.core GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free softwa