I have been experimenting with union mounts today with a recent
-stable (cvsupped yesterday), and I haven't had much luck.
Because cvsup likes to obliterate local changes, I thought it would be
convenient to keep the altered files on a separate filesystem and use
a union mount to overlay them on t
While everyone is hob-nobbing at USENIX I thought I'd take the
opportunity to make a gratuitous change to the proc structure.
I'll be adding a pointer to the end of it which can be used by
emulators for storing process-related emulator-specific information.
It'll initially be used for storing inf
> Luoqi Chen said:
> > >
> > Do you still have that piece of code? Does it handle the case involves more
> > than one process? For example, process 1 mmaps file B and reads file A into
> > the mmapped region, while process 2 mmaps file A and reads file B, this
> > could
> > also result in a deadl
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Nicolas Souchu wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Updating at Mar 23 f?v 1999 22:52:33 CET,
>
> cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
> -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I
On 23 Feb 1999, Joel Ray Holveck wrote:
> >> This reminds me; do we have a utility to reference wmesg strings back
> >> to the code that sets them, a la TAGS? Would this be useful?
> > No, and yes respectively.
>
> I have the scanner mostly written; there is one bug yet to fix (This
> time for s
In <199902191644.laa08...@misha.cisco.com>, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> I just finished going through a couple of crontabs prepending the
> command-lines with ``exec'', when it hit me.
>
> Can shell itself recognize, there will be no more commands and just
> proceed to exec without forking? What wou
In <199902230725.caa02...@y.dyson.net>, John S. Dyson wrote:
> Søren Schmidt said:
> >
> > It "should" work, but the promise support in the old system is, well,
> > hacky at best. I'm not sure if Promise supports more than one card
> > at a time, but from looking at the chip specs, it should wor
I'm today discovered strange routing to www.freebsd.org
sh$ traceroute www.freebsd.org
[...]
15? T1-CDROM-00-EX.US.CRL.NET (165.113.118.2)? 698.413 ms? 608.198 ms?
578.823 m
s
16? R-CRL-SFO-01-EX.US.CRL.NET (165.113.118.1)? 609.090 ms? 598.030 ms?
599.085
ms
17? T1-CDROM-00-EX.US.CRL.NET (165.113.
It seems Martin Cracauer wrote:
> In <199902230725.caa02...@y.dyson.net>, John S. Dyson wrote:
> > Søren Schmidt said:
> > >
> > > It "should" work, but the promise support in the old system is, well,
> > > hacky at best. I'm not sure if Promise supports more than one card
> > > at a time, but f
Has anyone gotten SO501 to run on -current?
Thx
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 12:09:03PM +0300, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote:
> You could add -DINVARIANTS to CFLAGS in sys/module/msdosfs/Makefile.
OK, did that, no more panics. Thanks!
> Dima
Cheers,
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/"Reliability means never
I've been having problems with an IDE controller on my motherboard.
I can't seem to be able to get it to recognize a CDROM drive (it's
the only device plugged on the second IDE controller). The kernel
seems to timeout on that second controller during the probe phase.
Maybe that's one of the infamou
On Wed, 24 Feb 1999 23:51:17 +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> Here's an excerpt from my kernel config. Did I miss something obvious?
>
> controller wdc0[...]
> diskwd0 at wdc0 drive 0
> diskwd1 at wdc0 drive 1
>
> controller wdc1[...]
> disk
> > Does FreeBSD still ship with CVS version 1.9.26? If so it needs to be
> > upgraded within the next 9 months or so. 1.9.26 can't parse dates
> > past 1999-12-31.
>
> Have you verified this?
from http://www.cyclic.com/cvs/info-y2k.html:
Do not plan to continue to use CVS 1.9 or older beyond
On Thu, Feb 25, 1999 at 01:01:09AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > controller wdc1[...]
> > diskwd2 at wdc1 drive 0
> > diskwd3 at wdc1 drive 1
>
> Um... Do you really have 4 wd devices plugged in?
Uh, well, no, just 2 (on the first IDE controller).
> Ass
On 24 Feb 1999 18:39:36 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.current you wrote:
>
>Hmm, which suggests that I need to leave the "do it by hand" code in
>there and recommend removing the BIOS :(
Are there any plans to support the Promise Fast Trak IDE RAID controller ?
---Mike
Mike Tancsa (mdt
On 24-Feb-99 Alok K. Dhir wrote:
> Has anyone gotten SO501 to run on -current?
I have and its quite good, but it hangs occasionally..
The actual 'officey' stuff is quite good tho (ie WP, spreadsheet etc..)
What problems are you having?
---
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genes
Martin Cracauer said:
> In <199902230725.caa02...@y.dyson.net>, John S. Dyson wrote:
> > Søren Schmidt said:
> > >
> > > It "should" work, but the promise support in the old system is, well,
> > > hacky at best. I'm not sure if Promise supports more than one card
> > > at a time, but from lookin
(Sorry for the crosspost, but I'd like to now if this is fixed in -current)
Hi!
I've seen three crashes in the last couple of weeks, with a server box that's
been running stable as a rock for two years, at least. It has an adaptec 2940UW
with six disks, and an adaptec 1542CP that's connected to a
> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse"
> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 13:42:37 -0600
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
> Sender: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
> X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
> Pre
On Thursday, 25 February 1999 at 1:04:48 +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 1999 at 01:01:09AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>>> controller wdc1[...]
>>> diskwd2 at wdc1 drive 0
>>> diskwd3 at wdc1 drive 1
>>
>> Um... Do you really have 4 wd devic
>> This reminds me; do we have a utility to reference wmesg strings back
>> to the code that sets them, a la TAGS? Would this be useful?
> No, and yes respectively.
Okay, I've got an early version written. It's got some fairly
substantial TODO's, and needs a fair bit of cleanup. I would
appreci
Hi Brian,
It was a good thought, but we can't put the blame on bad hardware.
These tests were done on the RELENG_3 system cvsup'd
as of Feb 22 @ 20:00 EST. All tests were run internal to the
same machine. So that I don't remain the only guy in the world
to see these test results, Control files a
I was unable to install it. It complains about not being able to copy
'setup.zip' to '/tmp/sv001.tmp' and keeps bombing out. This is after
pointing LD_LIBRARY_PATH to a place with glibc2, etc.
Did you have any trouble installing?
Al
On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
>
> On 24-F
I forgot to mention to those following this thread, files and
directories were definitely removed from /root that were not scheduled
for writing under ANY circumstances, on the RELENG_3 machine.
In fact, on the RELENG_3 machine all files and directories
(except ALL the .x files) were removed
On 25-Feb-99 Alok K. Dhir wrote:
> I was unable to install it. It complains about not being able to copy
> 'setup.zip' to '/tmp/sv001.tmp' and keeps bombing out. This is after
> pointing LD_LIBRARY_PATH to a place with glibc2, etc.
>
> Did you have any trouble installing?
What I did was th
>I've been having problems with an IDE controller on my motherboard.
>I can't seem to be able to get it to recognize a CDROM drive (it's
>the only device plugged on the second IDE controller). The kernel
>seems to timeout on that second controller during the probe phase.
>Maybe that's one of the in
"Alok K. Dhir" wrote:
>
> Has anyone gotten SO501 to run on -current?
Yes, it runs fairly well "out of the box", without
the registration problems of the previous version.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I have a suggestion for the FreeBSD maintainers.
In /bin/login, please don't check for mail when the user is root. And
in the case that the mail filesystem is mounted via NFS from a
non-responding server, it hangs root logins.
Root logins on machine A should never ever ever require machine B
to
:I have a suggestion for the FreeBSD maintainers.
:
:In /bin/login, please don't check for mail when the user is root. And
:in the case that the mail filesystem is mounted via NFS from a
:non-responding server, it hangs root logins.
:
:Root logins on machine A should never ever ever require machin
30 matches
Mail list logo
