Re: you broke current in some weird way... etc

2002-02-28 Thread Matthew Dillon
While I haven't specifically tested this patch it looks reasonable to me. Are you going to do an engineering/commit cycle with it? -Matt Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PR

Re: you broke current in some weird way... etc

2002-02-28 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matthew Dillon writes: > : Sometimes features in early boot can be adjusted by breaking into DDB > : and w/l changing the sysctl variable, but perhaps not in this case. > > I think this is an excellent idea. I have

Re: you broke current in some weird way... etc

2002-02-27 Thread Matthew Dillon
:On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:33:48AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: :> I'm just going to use this opportunity to plug the concept of tempora= :ry :> sysctl-instrumentation for a commit like this. =20 : :Any thoughts on having a root oid for sysctl oids like this, so they're :not forgotten, a

Re: you broke current in some weird way... etc

2002-02-27 Thread Nik Clayton
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:33:48AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > I'm just going to use this opportunity to plug the concept of temporary > sysctl-instrumentation for a commit like this. Any thoughts on having a root oid for sysctl oids like this, so they're not forgotten, and aren't as

Re: you broke current in some weird way... etc

2002-02-27 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matthew Dillon writes: : Sometimes features in early boot can be adjusted by breaking into DDB : and w/l changing the sysctl variable, but perhaps not in this case. I think this is an excellent idea. I have many of these tunables in the cardbus/oldcard code

Re: you broke current in some weird way... etc

2002-02-27 Thread Terry Lambert
Matthew Dillon wrote: > :> I'm just going to use this opportunity to plug the concept of temporary > :> sysctl-instrumentation for a commit like this. > : > :Overall, this is a good idea. However, it can't apply to > :any code that runs before init_main.c runs the SI_SUB_TUNABLES. > >

Re: you broke current in some weird way... etc

2002-02-27 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Matthew Dillon wrote: :> :date: 2002/02/27 09:51:32; author: peter; state: Exp; lines: +245 -191 :> :Back out all the pmap related stuff I've touched over the last few days. :> :There is some unresolved badness that has been eluding me, particularly :> :affecting uniprocessor kernels. Turnin

Re: you broke current in some weird way... etc

2002-02-27 Thread Terry Lambert
Matthew Dillon wrote: > :date: 2002/02/27 09:51:32; author: peter; state: Exp; lines: +245 -191 > :Back out all the pmap related stuff I've touched over the last few days. > :There is some unresolved badness that has been eluding me, particularly > :affecting uniprocessor kernels. Turning off

Re: you broke current in some weird way... etc

2002-02-27 Thread Matthew Dillon
:date: 2002/02/27 09:51:32; author: peter; state: Exp; lines: +245 -191 :Back out all the pmap related stuff I've touched over the last few days. :There is some unresolved badness that has been eluding me, particularly :affecting uniprocessor kernels. Turning off PG_G helped (which is a bad :s