* John Baldwin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Umm, developers are free to use whatever applications they want on their
> personal machines. The only thing that could possibly have any PR
> relation to web designers would be if we shipped an actual web browser
> in the base system that was "offen
On 05-Sep-2002 Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> Garrett Wollman wrote:
>> I'll stick with something that works, and works fast. I'm well aware
>> of the security issues, and have determined the risk to be
>> insignificant for the way I use a Web browser. (And frankly, I don't
>> much care what lusing
Garrett Wollman wrote:
> I'll stick with something that works, and works fast. I'm well aware
> of the security issues, and have determined the risk to be
> insignificant for the way I use a Web browser. (And frankly, I don't
> much care what lusing Web-design weenies think about it.)
Well, tha
< said:
> for Internet Explorer"). I would suggest to anybody still using
> Netscape 4 on a Unix platform that they try a replacement
> browser, whether that be Mozilla, Galeon, or something else
> (perhaps Opera or Konqueror).
Mozilla has an intolerable (read: Windows) user interface.
Konquero
Michael WARDLE wrote:
> The Gecko engine developed by the Mozilla Project, however seems
> to be very good. I find Galeon quite nice, as it uses Mozilla's
> quite capable HTML rendering engine, has its own well designed
> GTK-based GUI, and has little of Mozilla's bloat.
If it isn't broken, don'
Thus spake Michael WARDLE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The Gecko engine developed by the Mozilla Project, however seems
> to be very good. I find Galeon quite nice, as it uses Mozilla's
> quite capable HTML rendering engine, has its own well designed
> GTK-based GUI, and has little of Mozilla's bloat.
> > Mozilla, Galeon, and other browsers claim to be better, but
> > often fail to provide features that have been in Netscape
> > for forever.
>
> You mean features like being stable, at least sometimes?
> Efficiency? IMO, Mozilla has features up the kazoo, but the
> developers seem unwilling to
Thus spake Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mozilla, Galeon, and other browsers claim to be better, but
> often fail to provide features that have been in Netscape
> for forever.
You mean features like being stable, at least sometimes?
Efficiency? IMO, Mozilla has features up the kazoo, but
* Greg Black ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Joerg Wunsch wrote:
>
> > Galeon.
>
> Yeah right. Galeon wouldn't even build on the last FreeBSD box I
> tried it on when somebody told me to try it.
Tried Skipstone? Gecko based GTK browser.
--
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
| On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 09:56, Greg Black wrote:
| > Yeah right. Galeon wouldn't even build on the last FreeBSD box
| > I tried it on when somebody told me to try it.
|
| It compiles/works here like a charm, however, if you do have problems
| with it please send a problem re
On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 09:56, Greg Black wrote:
> Joerg Wunsch wrote:
>
> | "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |
> | >> Slow. Eats memory. Crashes all the time. Does not save state
> | >> between sessions. Does not render HTML 4 properly. Does not support
> | >> CSS properly. Does
"David O'Brien" wrote:
| On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 06:05:13AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
| > Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > > What problems do you have with it?
| >
| > Slow. Eats memory. Crashes all the time. Does not save state
| > between sessions. Does not render HTM
As Greg Black wrote:
> | > What brower available on FreeBSD does do all these things?
> |
> | Galeon.
>
> Yeah right. Galeon wouldn't even build on the last FreeBSD box
> I tried it on when somebody told me to try it.
Once it builds, it's about the best browser so far. ;-)
The problems of it
Joerg Wunsch wrote:
| "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| >> Slow. Eats memory. Crashes all the time. Does not save state
| >> between sessions. Does not render HTML 4 properly. Does not support
| >> CSS properly. Does not zoom. Does not display PNG properly.
| >> Incorrectly i
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Slow. Eats memory. Crashes all the time. Does not save state
>> between sessions. Does not render HTML 4 properly. Does not support
>> CSS properly. Does not zoom. Does not display PNG properly.
>> Incorrectly ignores cache-control headers on i
Rich Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about http://www.dice.com/jobsearch/index.html
http://www.ofug.org/~des/dice.png
(the error at the top is because my proxy blocks doubleclick)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "uns
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I use Opera 6. [...]
> Please try http://www.techiegold.com/ with Opera 6.
No problem: http://www.ofug.org/~des/techiegold.png
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebs
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 08:59:15PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What brower available on FreeBSD does do all these things?
>
> I use Opera 6. Its interactive response is not as snappy as I'd like,
> but it's still far better than any other b
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What brower available on FreeBSD does do all these things?
I use Opera 6. Its interactive response is not as snappy as I'd like,
but it's still far better than any other browsers I've used on
FreeBSD, except w3m.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 06:05:13AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What problems do you have with it?
>
> Slow. Eats memory. Crashes all the time. Does not save state
> between sessions. Does not render HTML 4 properly. Does not support
> C
20 matches
Mail list logo
