On 28-Feb-2002 (19:33:04/GMT) Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> port 2 addr 2: full speed, power 400 mA, config 1, \
> product 0x07d1(0x07d1), ScanLogic(0x04ce), rev 1.05
>ugen0
[...]
> port 2 addr 2: full speed, self powered, config 1, \
> USB to IDE(0x0002), USB to IDE(0x04ce),
On 28-Feb-2002 (06:57:50/GMT) Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> The only difference in /dev was -ugen{0,0.1,0.2} +xpt0 :(
>
># camcontrol rescan 0
> Re-scan of bus 0 was successful
>
># camcontrol devlist -v
> scbus0 on umass-sim0 bus 0:
> scbus-1 on xpt0 bus 0:
> < >at scbus-1 ta
On 28-Feb-2002 (05:05:40/GMT) Scott Long wrote:
>> Anyway, ugen0 disappear from /dev/ but _no_ umass0 appear,
>> only xpt0...
> The debug trace looks very good.
I think this is the only good news...
> No umass0 device should appear in /dev. Instead, you should
> get a da device. Do 'camcont
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 01:39:55AM +0100, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> On 27-Feb-2002 (23:17:15/GMT) Scott Long wrote:
>
> > Is the umass device compiled into the kernel, or loaded as a
> > module? If it's a module, is it loaded before you attach the
> > drive? The usb daemon isn't smart enough ye
On 27-Feb-2002 (23:17:15/GMT) Scott Long wrote:
> Is the umass device compiled into the kernel, or loaded as a
> module? If it's a module, is it loaded before you attach the
> drive? The usb daemon isn't smart enough yet to load it...
Now I have all compiled in. Something happens...
-8<
On 27-Feb-2002 (23:17:15/GMT) Scott Long wrote:
I forgot this piece of messages, it happens only once, when I
manually detached usb cable but never again when I rescan it.
-8<-[ messages ]-8<-
...kernel: ugen0: at uhub0 port 2 (addr 2) disconnected
...kernel: ugen0: detached
...k
On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 16:07, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> On 27-Feb-2002 (18:35:18/GMT) Scott long wrote:
>
> > You don't mention how your kernel is presently configured
> > or what other troubleshooting you've done, so all you can
> > hope to receive are wild guesses like:
>
> Usually I don't make
On 27-Feb-2002 (18:35:18/GMT) Scott long wrote:
> You don't mention how your kernel is presently configured
> or what other troubleshooting you've done, so all you can
> hope to receive are wild guesses like:
Usually I don't make stupid questions (I think), sorry for
wasting your time, but after
You don't mention how your kernel is presently configured or what other
troubleshooting you've done, so all you can hope to receive are wild
guesses like:
- Configure a kernel with the umass, scbus, and da devices, along with
the standard usb devices. This is documented in both the GENERIC confi
A friend of mime give me (only for some days) an external
usb hard disk device (a normal ide 2.5" with an interface
from ide to usb, self powered).
When I attach I got this info, I need it show as umass to
mount the msdos (fat32) file system on it, right?
Need I some special kernel configuration
10 matches
Mail list logo
